Technology · head to head
Okta vs Openstatus

Openstatus
Logging
Status pages with uptime monitoring and compliance-ready incident tracking
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Okta requires $1,500 annual minimum contract; Openstatus free tier severely limited to 1 monitor and 1 status page
- They diverge on capability: Okta covers Single sign-on (SSO), Openstatus covers Branded status pages.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Okta and Openstatus actually diverge.
| Attribute | Okta | Openstatus |
|---|---|---|
| Platforms | Web, SaaS | Web, API |
| Category | Technology | Logging |
| Founded | 2009 | 2023 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), pricing model (Unknown), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Okta
- Single sign-on (SSO)
- Multi-factor authentication
- Lifecycle management
- Universal directory
- API access management
- B2B integration
- Passwordless authentication
- Adaptive MFA
Only in Openstatus
- Branded status pages
- Global monitoring
- Incident notifications
- Audit-ready trails
- API and CLI access
- Terraform provider
- Self-hosting
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Okta
- Employee SSOnot Openstatus
- Customer identitynot Openstatus
- B2B integrationnot Openstatus
- Zero Trust securitynot Openstatus
- Compliancenot Openstatus
Openstatus
- Publishing incident status pages to customersnot Okta
- Demonstrating compliance readiness to auditorsnot Okta
- Alerting internal teams when services are downnot Okta
- Tracking uptime metrics across global regionsnot Okta
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Okta
- Requires $1,500 annual minimum contract
- Admin-only MFA can be vulnerable to push notification fatigue attacks
- Implementation requires significant services and integration fees in year one
Openstatus
- Free tier severely limited to 1 monitor and 1 status page
- Per-status-page pricing adds cost for multi-product organizations
- No built-in workflow orchestration or incident response automation
- Limited historical analytics beyond incident documentation
- No AI-powered incident diagnosis or root cause analysis
Pricing, plan by plan
Okta
Free- Starter Suite$6/user/month
- SSO
- MFA
- Universal Directory
- Core Essentials Suite$14/user/month
- Adaptive MFA
- Privileged Access
- Lifecycle Management
- Essentials Suite$17/user/month
- Same as Core Essentials
- Most popular
- Professional Suite$undefined/custom
- Device Access
- Identity Security Posture
- Threat Protection
Openstatus
Free- FreeFree
- 1 monitor with 10-minute intervals
- 1 status page with 3 components
- No credit card required
- Starter$30/month
- 20 monitors with 1-minute intervals
- 1 status page with 20 components
- 3-month data retention
- Pro$100/month
- 50 monitors with 30-second intervals
- 5 status pages with 50 components each
- 12-month data retention
- Scale$500/month
- 50 monitors with 30-second intervals
- 10 status pages with 500 components each
- 24-month data retention
Which should you pick?
Choose Okta if
- You need single sign-on (sso).
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, SaaS.
- You also want multi-factor authentication.
Choose Openstatus if
- You need branded status pages.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, API.
- You also want global monitoring.
Questions people ask
- Is Okta or Openstatus better?
- Neither clearly leads. Okta starts at Free and Openstatus at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Okta or Openstatus?
- Okta starts at Free and Openstatus at Free.
- Does Okta or Openstatus run on more platforms?
- Okta runs on Web, SaaS. Openstatus runs on Web, API.
- Can I use Okta for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Okta best used for?
- Okta is most often used for employee sso, customer identity, b2b integration, zero trust security. Of those, employee sso and customer identity are not what Openstatus is typically brought in for.
- What can Okta do that Openstatus cannot?
- Okta covers Single sign-on (SSO), Multi-factor authentication, Lifecycle management, Universal directory. Openstatus covers Branded status pages, Global monitoring, Incident notifications, Audit-ready trails.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Okta: What is the minimum contract for Okta Workforce Identity?
Okta requires a $1,500 annual minimum contract for Workforce Identity plans. Pricing starts at $6 per user per month (Starter) and ranges to $17 per user per month (Essentials), billed annually.
SourceOpenstatus: Can I use OpenStatus for free?
Yes, the free tier includes 1 monitor with 10-minute check intervals and 1 status page with 3 components, no credit card required.
SourceOkta: Does Okta offer a free trial?
Yes, Okta provides a 30-day free trial so customers can explore all product capabilities before committing to a paid plan.
SourceOpenstatus: What is included in annual billing for Starter plan?
Annual billing costs $300/year (vs $360/month), saving 2 months. Includes 20 monitors, 1-minute intervals, and all alert types.
SourceOkta: How many pre-built integrations does Okta support?
Okta offers over 7,000 pre-built integrations with popular enterprise applications including Salesforce, Slack, Workday, Box, Confluence, and Zendesk.
SourceOpenstatus: Can I add extra status pages beyond my plan limit?
Yes, additional status pages cost $20/month and are billed separately on top of your plan.
SourceOkta: What security features does Okta provide for admins?
Okta provides multi-factor authentication, adaptive MFA, single logout, and identity threat detection and response. However, only 94% of Okta customers have MFA enabled for administrators.
SourceOkta: Can Okta integrate with on-premises directories?
Yes, Okta's Universal Directory and lifecycle management support cloud and on-premises identity sources, including Active Directory and LDAP.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Okta vs Asana
- Okta vs ClickUp
- Okta vs Linear
- Okta vs Figma
- Okta vs Kubernetes
- Okta vs Notion
- Okta vs Datadog
- Okta vs Monday.com
- Okta vs Terraform
- Okta vs Docker
- Okta vs Greenhouse
- Okta vs Google Chrome
- Okta vs Intercom
- Okta vs Mozilla Firefox
- Okta vs PostHog
- Okta vs Redis
- Okta vs Supabase
- Okta vs Amplitude
- Okta vs Elastic Stack
- Okta vs New Relic
- Okta vs Datadog Logs
- Okta vs Coralogix
- Okta vs Grafana Loki
- Okta vs incident.io
- Okta vs Cronitor
- Okta vs FireHydrant
- Okta vs Healthchecks
- Okta vs Rootly
- Okta vs Checkly
- Okta vs CloudWatch
- Okta vs Dynatrace
- Okta vs InfluxDB
- Okta vs Airbrake
- Okta vs AppDynamics
- Okta vs Axiom
- Okta vs Azure Monitor
- Openstatus vs Asana
- Openstatus vs ClickUp
- Openstatus vs Linear
- Openstatus vs Figma
- Openstatus vs Kubernetes
- Openstatus vs Notion
- Openstatus vs Datadog
- Openstatus vs Monday.com
- Openstatus vs Terraform
- Openstatus vs Docker
- Openstatus vs Greenhouse
- Openstatus vs Google Chrome
- Openstatus vs Intercom
- Openstatus vs Mozilla Firefox
- Openstatus vs PostHog
- Openstatus vs Redis
- Openstatus vs Supabase
- Openstatus vs Amplitude
- Openstatus vs Elastic Stack
- Openstatus vs New Relic
- Openstatus vs Datadog Logs
- Openstatus vs Coralogix
- Openstatus vs Grafana Loki
- Openstatus vs incident.io
- Openstatus vs Cronitor
- Openstatus vs FireHydrant
- Openstatus vs Healthchecks
- Openstatus vs Rootly
- Openstatus vs Checkly
- Openstatus vs CloudWatch
- Openstatus vs Dynatrace
- Openstatus vs InfluxDB
- Openstatus vs Airbrake
- Openstatus vs AppDynamics
- Openstatus vs Axiom
- Openstatus vs Azure Monitor

