Log Management · head to head
Azure Monitor vs Okta
Azure Monitor
Log Management
Azure's Monitoring and Diagnostics Service
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Azure Monitor billed per GB ingested across three separate log plans, Auxiliary, Basic and Analytics, so the plan chosen changes the rate as much as the volume does; Okta requires $1,500 annual minimum contract
- They diverge on capability: Azure Monitor covers Log collection, Okta covers Single sign-on (SSO).
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Azure Monitor and Okta actually diverge.
| Attribute | Azure Monitor | Okta |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | usage-based | Unknown |
| Platforms | Web, Api | Web, SaaS |
| Category | Log Management | Technology |
| Founded | 2010 | 2009 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Azure Monitor
- Log collection
- Metrics collection
- Alerts and notifications
- Custom dashboards
- API
- Webhooks
- REST
- Web support
Only in Okta
- Single sign-on (SSO)
- Multi-factor authentication
- Lifecycle management
- Universal directory
- API access management
- B2B integration
- Passwordless authentication
- Adaptive MFA
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Azure Monitor
- Collecting logs and metrics from Azure resourcesnot Okta
- Alerting on metric thresholds and log queriesnot Okta
- Application performance monitoring through Application Insightsnot Okta
- Long-term log retention for compliancenot Okta
- Querying operational data with KQLnot Okta
Okta
- Employee SSOnot Azure Monitor
- Customer identitynot Azure Monitor
- B2B integrationnot Azure Monitor
- Zero Trust securitynot Azure Monitor
- Compliancenot Azure Monitor
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Azure Monitor
- Billed per GB ingested across three separate log plans, Auxiliary, Basic and Analytics, so the plan chosen changes the rate as much as the volume does
- Only the first 5 GB a month of Analytics logs is free per billing account
- Retention beyond the base period is charged per GB per month, up to 2 years interactive and 12 years long term
- Log queries and search jobs are billed per GB scanned, so investigating an incident costs money
- Alert rules are billed per time series for metrics and by execution frequency for logs
- The pricing page shows placeholders rather than rates until a region and currency are chosen
Okta
- Requires $1,500 annual minimum contract
- Admin-only MFA can be vulnerable to push notification fatigue attacks
- Implementation requires significant services and integration fees in year one
Pricing, plan by plan
Azure Monitor
Free- FreeFree
- Log collection
- Metrics collection
- Alerts and notifications
Okta
Free- Starter Suite$6/user/month
- SSO
- MFA
- Universal Directory
- Core Essentials Suite$14/user/month
- Adaptive MFA
- Privileged Access
- Lifecycle Management
- Essentials Suite$17/user/month
- Same as Core Essentials
- Most popular
- Professional Suite$null/custom
- Device Access
- Identity Security Posture
- Threat Protection
Which should you pick?
Choose Azure Monitor if
- You need log collection.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Api.
- You also want metrics collection.
Choose Okta if
- You need single sign-on (sso).
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, SaaS.
- You also want multi-factor authentication.
Questions people ask
- Is Azure Monitor or Okta better?
- Neither clearly leads. Azure Monitor starts at Free and Okta at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Azure Monitor or Okta?
- Azure Monitor starts at Free and Okta at Free.
- Does Azure Monitor or Okta run on more platforms?
- Azure Monitor runs on Web, Api. Okta runs on Web, SaaS.
- Can I use Azure Monitor for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Azure Monitor best used for?
- Azure Monitor is most often used for collecting logs and metrics from azure resources, alerting on metric thresholds and log queries, application performance monitoring through application insights, long-term log retention for compliance. Of those, collecting logs and metrics from azure resources and alerting on metric thresholds and log queries are not what Okta is typically brought in for.
- What can Azure Monitor do that Okta cannot?
- Azure Monitor covers Log collection, Metrics collection, Alerts and notifications, Custom dashboards. Okta covers Single sign-on (SSO), Multi-factor authentication, Lifecycle management, Universal directory.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Okta: What is the minimum contract for Okta Workforce Identity?
Okta requires a $1,500 annual minimum contract for Workforce Identity plans. Pricing starts at $6 per user per month (Starter) and ranges to $17 per user per month (Essentials), billed annually.
SourceOkta: Does Okta offer a free trial?
Yes, Okta provides a 30-day free trial so customers can explore all product capabilities before committing to a paid plan.
SourceOkta: How many pre-built integrations does Okta support?
Okta offers over 7,000 pre-built integrations with popular enterprise applications including Salesforce, Slack, Workday, Box, Confluence, and Zendesk.
SourceOkta: What security features does Okta provide for admins?
Okta provides multi-factor authentication, adaptive MFA, single logout, and identity threat detection and response. However, only 94% of Okta customers have MFA enabled for administrators.
SourceOkta: Can Okta integrate with on-premises directories?
Yes, Okta's Universal Directory and lifecycle management support cloud and on-premises identity sources, including Active Directory and LDAP.
SourceRelated pages
More on Azure Monitor
Other head to heads
- Azure Monitor vs Elastic Stack
- Azure Monitor vs New Relic
- Azure Monitor vs Datadog Logs
- Azure Monitor vs Coralogix
- Azure Monitor vs Grafana Loki
- Azure Monitor vs CloudWatch
- Azure Monitor vs Dynatrace
- Azure Monitor vs InfluxDB
- Azure Monitor vs Airbrake
- Azure Monitor vs AppDynamics
- Azure Monitor vs Axiom
- Azure Monitor vs Better Stack
- Azure Monitor vs Bugsnag
- Azure Monitor vs Dynatrace Logs
- Azure Monitor vs Elastic
- Azure Monitor vs Elastic APM
- Azure Monitor vs Elasticsearch Service
- Azure Monitor vs ELK Stack
- Azure Monitor vs Asana
- Azure Monitor vs ClickUp
- Azure Monitor vs Figma
- Azure Monitor vs Linear
- Azure Monitor vs Monday.com
- Azure Monitor vs Greenhouse
- Azure Monitor vs Notion
- Azure Monitor vs Amplitude
- Azure Monitor vs Datadog
- Azure Monitor vs PostHog
- Azure Monitor vs PyCharm
- Azure Monitor vs Sketch
- Azure Monitor vs Docker
- Azure Monitor vs Netlify
- Azure Monitor vs Aha!
- Azure Monitor vs Coda
- Azure Monitor vs Dashlane
- Azure Monitor vs GitHub
- Okta vs Elastic Stack
- Okta vs New Relic
- Okta vs Datadog Logs
- Okta vs Coralogix
- Okta vs Grafana Loki
- Okta vs CloudWatch
- Okta vs Dynatrace
- Okta vs InfluxDB
- Okta vs Airbrake
- Okta vs AppDynamics
- Okta vs Axiom
- Okta vs Better Stack
- Okta vs Bugsnag
- Okta vs Dynatrace Logs
- Okta vs Elastic
- Okta vs Elastic APM
- Okta vs Elasticsearch Service
- Okta vs ELK Stack
- Okta vs Asana
- Okta vs ClickUp
- Okta vs Figma
- Okta vs Linear
- Okta vs Monday.com
- Okta vs Greenhouse
- Okta vs Notion
- Okta vs Amplitude
- Okta vs Datadog
- Okta vs PostHog
- Okta vs PyCharm
- Okta vs Sketch
- Okta vs Docker
- Okta vs Netlify
- Okta vs Aha!
- Okta vs Coda
- Okta vs Dashlane
- Okta vs GitHub

