Softwr

Recruitment · head to head

Occupop vs Recruiterbox

Occupop logo

Occupop

Recruitment

Applicant tracking built for small and mid-sized European employers that hire without a dedicated recruiter

From
On request
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite
Recruiterbox logo

Recruiterbox

HR

Simple recruiting software that works

From
$250/month
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite

The short version

  • Each has a real cost: Occupop there is no outbound sourcing or passive candidate search, so any role that will not fill from applications has to be worked in LinkedIn Recruiter or an agency and tracked back manually.; Recruiterbox pricing not publicly displayed; requires contacting sales for quotes
  • They diverge on capability: Occupop covers Multi-board posting, Recruiterbox covers Applicant Tracking.
  • Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which Occupop and Recruiterbox actually diverge.

Attributes where Occupop and Recruiterbox differ
AttributeOccupopRecruiterbox
Starting priceOn request$250/month
Pricing modelquotesubscription
CategoryRecruitmentHR
FoundedUnknown2011

Identical on both: free tier (No), platforms (Web), user rating (Not yet rated).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in Occupop

  • Multi-board posting
  • Branded careers page
  • Candidate scoring
  • Interview scheduling
  • Talent pools
  • Hiring manager collaboration
  • Offer management

Only in Recruiterbox

  • Applicant Tracking
  • Job Posting
  • Candidate Management
  • Team Collaboration
  • Interview Scheduling
  • LinkedIn
  • Indeed
  • Google Workspace

Both cover

  • Reporting

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

Occupop

  • An Irish employer that needs applications tracked in one place and posted to Irish boards without manual re-keyingnot Recruiterbox
  • A hospitality or care group hiring the same roles repeatedly across multiple sitesnot Recruiterbox
  • A public sector or charity buyer that requires candidate data to stay inside the European Unionnot Recruiterbox
  • A company where line managers do the hiring and will abandon anything that needs trainingnot Recruiterbox

Recruiterbox

  • Applicant tracking system for recruiting and hiringnot Occupop
  • Workflow automation and candidate management for recruitment teamsnot Occupop

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

Occupop

  • There is no outbound sourcing or passive candidate search, so any role that will not fill from applications has to be worked in LinkedIn Recruiter or an agency and tracked back manually.
  • Integration coverage is thin outside the Irish and UK ecosystem, so a company running a US payroll or a major HRIS will usually be exporting CSV files rather than syncing new hires.
  • Reporting answers time to hire and source questions but does not support the cohort or funnel analysis a talent team needs once it runs dozens of requisitions at once.
  • The vendor is small, which means the roadmap moves slowly and there is no realistic pressure a mid-market customer can apply to get a feature built.
  • Pricing is quoted rather than published and is structured around plan tiers and hiring volume, so seasonal employers can find the annual cost jumps in the year they run a peak recruitment campaign.

Recruiterbox

  • Pricing not publicly displayed; requires contacting sales for quotes
  • Limited integration marketplace compared to competitors
  • Web-based only; no dedicated mobile app
  • Smaller feature set for enterprise-level hiring compared to larger ATS platforms

Pricing, plan by plan

Occupop

On request
  • Occupop$undefined/year
    • Unlimited users on most plans
    • Multi-board job posting
    • Branded careers page

Recruiterbox

$250/month
  • Trakstar Hire$250/month
    • Unlimited Jobs
    • Job Board Posting
    • Candidate Tracking

Which should you pick?

Choose Occupop if

  • You need multi-board posting.
  • You also want branded careers page.
Occupop review

Choose Recruiterbox if

  • You need applicant tracking.
  • You also want job posting.
Recruiterbox review

Questions people ask

Is Occupop or Recruiterbox better?
Neither clearly leads. Occupop starts at On request and Recruiterbox at $250/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, Occupop or Recruiterbox?
Occupop starts at On request and Recruiterbox at $250/month.
Does Occupop or Recruiterbox run on more platforms?
Both run on Web, so platform support will not decide this one for you.
What is Occupop best used for?
Occupop is most often used for an irish employer that needs applications tracked in one place and posted to irish boards without manual re-keying, a hospitality or care group hiring the same roles repeatedly across multiple sites, a public sector or charity buyer that requires candidate data to stay inside the european union, a company where line managers do the hiring and will abandon anything that needs training. Of those, an irish employer that needs applications tracked in one place and posted to irish boards without manual re-keying and a hospitality or care group hiring the same roles repeatedly across multiple sites are not what Recruiterbox is typically brought in for.
What can Occupop do that Recruiterbox cannot?
Occupop covers Multi-board posting, Branded careers page, Candidate scoring, Interview scheduling. Recruiterbox covers Applicant Tracking, Job Posting, Candidate Management, Team Collaboration. Both handle Reporting.

Answered from the vendors’ own pages

Occupop: Where is candidate data stored?

Inside the European Union, which is the reason many Irish public sector and healthcare buyers shortlist it over larger non-EU vendors.

Recruiterbox: What is Recruiterbox (now Trakstar Hire)?

Recruiterbox was rebranded as Trakstar Hire in 2021. It is a web-based applicant tracking system for managing recruitment, with features for job posting, candidate sourcing, interview scheduling, and collaborative hiring.

Source
Occupop: Does it do candidate sourcing?

No. It manages inbound applications and talent pools. Sourcing passive candidates happens elsewhere.

Recruiterbox: Does Trakstar Hire integrate with other tools?

Yes, Trakstar Hire integrates with Slack for notifications, LinkedIn for candidate sourcing, and Google Workspace. Recruiters receive notifications in Slack when candidates move through stages or when interviews are scheduled.

Source
Occupop: Is it priced per recruiter?

No. Plans are sold on tier and hiring volume with unlimited users on most tiers, which suits companies where many managers need access.

Recruiterbox: How many candidates can Trakstar Hire manage?

Trakstar Hire (formerly Recruiterbox) processes over 300,000 applicants added monthly, interviews over 1 million candidates annually, and handles 5,000+ new hires monthly.

Source
Occupop: Will it scale past a few hundred employees?

It handles the hiring volume, but companies with a dedicated talent function usually move to a system with sourcing, CRM and deeper analytics.

Share

Related pages

More on Occupop

More on Recruiterbox

Keep looking

Other head to heads