Manufacturing · head to head
Augury vs Novity

Augury
Manufacturing
Machine health monitoring sold as a per-machine annual service including sensors, installation and analyst diagnostics
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Novity
Energy
Hybrid physics and machine learning prognostics that estimate remaining useful life for process equipment
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Augury the per-machine annual fee never stops, so over a five to eight year horizon the total exceeds buying sensors and software outright and running the programme yourself.; Novity novity is a small venture-backed company with a strategic investor rather than a profitable business, so continuity risk is real and the Tokyo Gas investment signals a likely eventual acquisition that would reset the roadmap.
- They diverge on capability: Augury covers Halo sensors, Novity covers TruPrognostics engine.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Augury and Novity actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (quote), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Augury
- Halo sensors
- Diagnostics as a Service
- Named fault diagnosis
- Process Health
- CMMS integration
- Installation included
- Fleet views
- Unlimited users
Only in Novity
- TruPrognostics engine
- Cold-start modelling
- Fault mode diagnosis
- Remaining useful life
- Existing sensor reuse
- Recommended actions
- Historian connectors
- Asset class libraries
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Augury
- A food plant with 200 similar motors and pumps and no vibration analyst on staffnot Novity
- A multi-site manufacturer that needs one reliability picture across plants without standardising their maintenance teamsnot Novity
- An operator whose capex budget will not approve sensor hardware but whose opex budget will approve a servicenot Novity
- A site trying to move from calendar-based motor overhauls to condition-based intervals with defensible evidencenot Novity
Novity
- A gas processing plant that needs a defensible time-to-failure number before deferring a turnaroundnot Augury
- An LNG terminal with critical compressors and no run-to-failure history to train a conventional modelnot Augury
- A wastewater operator whose existing vibration alarms are ignored because they carry no severity or horizonnot Augury
- A generator operator supplying data centre load where an unplanned trip carries contractual penaltiesnot Augury
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Augury
- The per-machine annual fee never stops, so over a five to eight year horizon the total exceeds buying sensors and software outright and running the programme yourself.
- Coverage is aimed at standard rotating equipment; reciprocating compressors, very low-speed machinery and non-rotating assets are poorly served, so you still need a second monitoring approach.
- Diagnoses depend on Augurys analysts, which means the quality of your programme is set by a vendor queue you do not control and turnaround is not something you can escalate internally.
- The sensors and the analytics are one system, so leaving Augury means removing the hardware and starting again; there is no path to keep the sensors and change the software.
- Pricing is unpublished and negotiated per fleet, so buyers have no benchmark and comparable plants can pay materially different per-machine rates.
Novity
- Novity is a small venture-backed company with a strategic investor rather than a profitable business, so continuity risk is real and the Tokyo Gas investment signals a likely eventual acquisition that would reset the roadmap.
- Physics-based models must be configured per equipment class, so each new asset type is an engineering engagement rather than a configuration screen, and rollout speed is limited by Novitys own capacity.
- Prognostics depend on the quality and sampling rate of your historian data; plants recording ten-minute averages will not get useful remaining-useful-life estimates without new instrumentation.
- Nothing about pricing is published and there is no self-service entry point, so evaluation always starts with a sales-led pilot on a handful of assets.
- The deployment footprint is concentrated in oil and gas, LNG and water, so reference customers and pre-built asset models outside those industries are limited.
Pricing, plan by plan
Augury
On request- Machine Health$undefined/year
- Flat annual fee per monitored machine
- Sensors, gateway, connectivity and installation included
- Unlimited users and unlimited diagnostic reviews
Novity
On request- TruPrognostics$undefined/year
- Quoted per asset class and monitored equipment count
- Model configuration and commissioning quoted as a project
- Typically an annual subscription tied to a pilot then a rollout
Which should you pick?
Choose Augury if
- You need halo sensors.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want diagnostics as a service.
Choose Novity if
- You need truprognostics engine.
- You work on Web, Cloud.
- You also want cold-start modelling.
Questions people ask
- Is Augury or Novity better?
- Neither clearly leads. Augury starts at On request and Novity at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Augury or Novity?
- Augury starts at On request and Novity at On request.
- Does Augury or Novity run on more platforms?
- Augury runs on Web, iOS, Android. Novity runs on Web, Cloud.
- What is Augury best used for?
- Augury is most often used for a food plant with 200 similar motors and pumps and no vibration analyst on staff, a multi-site manufacturer that needs one reliability picture across plants without standardising their maintenance teams, an operator whose capex budget will not approve sensor hardware but whose opex budget will approve a service, a site trying to move from calendar-based motor overhauls to condition-based intervals with defensible evidence. Of those, a food plant with 200 similar motors and pumps and no vibration analyst on staff and a multi-site manufacturer that needs one reliability picture across plants without standardising their maintenance teams are not what Novity is typically brought in for.
- What can Augury do that Novity cannot?
- Augury covers Halo sensors, Diagnostics as a Service, Named fault diagnosis, Process Health. Novity covers TruPrognostics engine, Cold-start modelling, Fault mode diagnosis, Remaining useful life.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Augury: Do I buy the sensors?
No. Sensors, gateways, connectivity and installation are included in the per-machine annual fee.
Novity: What does Novity actually output?
A named failure mode and an estimated remaining useful life with a confidence band, not just an anomaly alert.
Augury: Is there a per-user licence?
No. The web application allows unlimited users; the meter is monitored machines.
Novity: Do we need failure history to train it?
No. The physics component is what lets it produce useful prognostics on equipment with little or no run-to-failure data.
Augury: Who does the diagnosis?
Machine-learning models flag issues and Augury vibration analysts review them before a finding is released to you.
Novity: Do we need new sensors?
Often not. It reads from your existing historian, but low sampling rates or missing measurements can require additional instrumentation.
Augury: What happens if we cancel?
The sensors are part of the service and monitoring stops; you do not retain a usable standalone system.
Novity: Who backs the company?
It was spun out of Xerox PARC and took a strategic investment from Acario Innovation, the venture arm of Tokyo Gas, in 2026.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Augury vs KCF Technologies
- Augury vs SKF Enlight Centre
- Augury vs Sensemore
- Augury vs Waites Sensor Technologies
- Augury vs Nanoprecise Sci Corp
- Augury vs Erbessd Instruments
- Augury vs PROGNOST Systems
- Augury vs Petasense
- Augury vs MOVUS
- Augury vs Samotics
- Augury vs Poseidon Systems
- Augury vs eMaint
- Augury vs ABB 800xA
- Augury vs AVEVA System Platform
- Augury vs Hippo CMMS
- Augury vs Rockwell FactoryTalk
- Augury vs 3YOURMIND
- Augury vs AMFG
- Augury vs AVEVA PI System
- Augury vs Cognite Data Fusion
- Augury vs Cutsforth InsightCM
- Augury vs Bently Nevada System 1
- Augury vs Emerson Ovation
- Augury vs Wood Mackenzie Lens
- Augury vs Fronius SOLARWEB
- Augury vs Schneider Electric EcoStruxure
- Augury vs Enverus Energy Analytics
- Augury vs SolarWinds
- Augury vs Landis+Gyr Gridstream
- Augury vs OSIsoft PI System
- Augury vs OpenLink Endur
- Augury vs Oracle Utilities
- Augury vs Petrel E&P Software
- Augury vs Siemens EnergyIP
- Augury vs Azelio Energy Storage
- Novity vs KCF Technologies
- Novity vs SKF Enlight Centre
- Novity vs Sensemore
- Novity vs Waites Sensor Technologies
- Novity vs Nanoprecise Sci Corp
- Novity vs Erbessd Instruments
- Novity vs PROGNOST Systems
- Novity vs Petasense
- Novity vs MOVUS
- Novity vs Samotics
- Novity vs Poseidon Systems
- Novity vs eMaint
- Novity vs ABB 800xA
- Novity vs AVEVA System Platform
- Novity vs Hippo CMMS
- Novity vs Rockwell FactoryTalk
- Novity vs 3YOURMIND
- Novity vs AMFG
- Novity vs AVEVA PI System
- Novity vs Cognite Data Fusion
- Novity vs Cutsforth InsightCM
- Novity vs Bently Nevada System 1
- Novity vs Emerson Ovation
- Novity vs Wood Mackenzie Lens
- Novity vs Fronius SOLARWEB
- Novity vs Schneider Electric EcoStruxure
- Novity vs Enverus Energy Analytics
- Novity vs SolarWinds
- Novity vs Landis+Gyr Gridstream
- Novity vs OSIsoft PI System
- Novity vs OpenLink Endur
- Novity vs Oracle Utilities
- Novity vs Petrel E&P Software
- Novity vs Siemens EnergyIP
- Novity vs Azelio Energy Storage
