Softwr

Manufacturing · head to head

Nanoprecise Sci Corp vs Novity

Nanoprecise Sci Corp logo

Nanoprecise Sci Corp

Manufacturing

Battery-powered six-in-one condition monitoring sensors with automated fault diagnosis

From
On request
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite
Novity logo

Novity

Energy

Hybrid physics and machine learning prognostics that estimate remaining useful life for process equipment

From
On request
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite

The short version

  • Each has a real cost: Nanoprecise Sci Corp the hardware and analytics are inseparable, so you cannot bring your own accelerometers or keep the platform if you change sensor vendor, and every expansion of coverage is a hardware purchase as well as a subscription increase.; Novity novity is a small venture-backed company with a strategic investor rather than a profitable business, so continuity risk is real and the Tokyo Gas investment signals a likely eventual acquisition that would reset the roadmap.
  • They diverge on capability: Nanoprecise Sci Corp covers Six-parameter sensor, Novity covers TruPrognostics engine.
  • Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which Nanoprecise Sci Corp and Novity actually diverge.

Attributes where Nanoprecise Sci Corp and Novity differ
AttributeNanoprecise Sci CorpNovity
PlatformsWeb, Cloud, iOS, AndroidWeb, Cloud
CategoryManufacturingEnergy

Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (quote), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in Nanoprecise Sci Corp

  • Six-parameter sensor
  • Automated fault classification
  • Remaining useful life estimate
  • Multi-connectivity
  • Long battery life
  • Energy and carbon reporting

Only in Novity

  • TruPrognostics engine
  • Cold-start modelling
  • Fault mode diagnosis
  • Remaining useful life
  • Existing sensor reuse
  • Recommended actions
  • Historian connectors
  • Asset class libraries

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

Nanoprecise Sci Corp

  • A plant with no vibration analyst that needs a named fault rather than a spectrum to interpretnot Novity
  • Monitoring rotating equipment in areas with no power or network cabling, where a battery sensor on LTE avoids an electrical projectnot Novity
  • A mining site tracking conveyor and pump condition across a large area where walkaround routes are impracticalnot Novity
  • A facilities team wanting motor energy waste and condition from the same device to justify the spend on two groundsnot Novity

Novity

  • A gas processing plant that needs a defensible time-to-failure number before deferring a turnaroundnot Nanoprecise Sci Corp
  • An LNG terminal with critical compressors and no run-to-failure history to train a conventional modelnot Nanoprecise Sci Corp
  • A wastewater operator whose existing vibration alarms are ignored because they carry no severity or horizonnot Nanoprecise Sci Corp
  • A generator operator supplying data centre load where an unplanned trip carries contractual penaltiesnot Nanoprecise Sci Corp

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

Nanoprecise Sci Corp

  • The hardware and analytics are inseparable, so you cannot bring your own accelerometers or keep the platform if you change sensor vendor, and every expansion of coverage is a hardware purchase as well as a subscription increase.
  • Per-asset subscription costs scale linearly with the number of monitored machines, so full coverage of a large rotating asset population becomes expensive in a way a traditional route-based programme does not.
  • Nanoprecise is a small venture-funded company, so a buyer standardising a whole estate on its sensors is taking a supplier continuity risk that a Baker Hughes or SKF purchase does not carry.
  • Automated fault classification is only as good as the model for your specific machine type, and unusual or slow-speed equipment is where these systems are weakest, exactly where a human analyst would still be needed.
  • Nothing is published on pricing, hardware cost, gateway requirements or contract length, so total cost for a realistic deployment cannot be estimated without a sales engagement.

Novity

  • Novity is a small venture-backed company with a strategic investor rather than a profitable business, so continuity risk is real and the Tokyo Gas investment signals a likely eventual acquisition that would reset the roadmap.
  • Physics-based models must be configured per equipment class, so each new asset type is an engineering engagement rather than a configuration screen, and rollout speed is limited by Novitys own capacity.
  • Prognostics depend on the quality and sampling rate of your historian data; plants recording ten-minute averages will not get useful remaining-useful-life estimates without new instrumentation.
  • Nothing about pricing is published and there is no self-service entry point, so evaluation always starts with a sales-led pilot on a handful of assets.
  • The deployment footprint is concentrated in oil and gas, LNG and water, so reference customers and pre-built asset models outside those industries are limited.

Pricing, plan by plan

Nanoprecise Sci Corp

On request
  • MachineDoctor$undefined/month
    • Subscription priced per monitored asset
    • MachineDoctor sensor hardware required per asset
    • Gateway hardware required for WiFi and LoRa deployments

Novity

On request
  • TruPrognostics$undefined/year
    • Quoted per asset class and monitored equipment count
    • Model configuration and commissioning quoted as a project
    • Typically an annual subscription tied to a pilot then a rollout

Which should you pick?

Choose Nanoprecise Sci Corp if

  • You need six-parameter sensor.
  • You work on Web, Cloud, iOS, Android.
  • You also want automated fault classification.
Nanoprecise Sci Corp review

Choose Novity if

  • You need truprognostics engine.
  • You work on Web, Cloud.
  • You also want cold-start modelling.
Novity review

Questions people ask

Is Nanoprecise Sci Corp or Novity better?
Neither clearly leads. Nanoprecise Sci Corp starts at On request and Novity at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, Nanoprecise Sci Corp or Novity?
Nanoprecise Sci Corp starts at On request and Novity at On request.
Does Nanoprecise Sci Corp or Novity run on more platforms?
Nanoprecise Sci Corp runs on Web, Cloud, iOS, Android. Novity runs on Web, Cloud.
What is Nanoprecise Sci Corp best used for?
Nanoprecise Sci Corp is most often used for a plant with no vibration analyst that needs a named fault rather than a spectrum to interpret, monitoring rotating equipment in areas with no power or network cabling, where a battery sensor on lte avoids an electrical project, a mining site tracking conveyor and pump condition across a large area where walkaround routes are impractical, a facilities team wanting motor energy waste and condition from the same device to justify the spend on two grounds. Of those, a plant with no vibration analyst that needs a named fault rather than a spectrum to interpret and monitoring rotating equipment in areas with no power or network cabling, where a battery sensor on lte avoids an electrical project are not what Novity is typically brought in for.
What can Nanoprecise Sci Corp do that Novity cannot?
Nanoprecise Sci Corp covers Six-parameter sensor, Automated fault classification, Remaining useful life estimate, Multi-connectivity. Novity covers TruPrognostics engine, Cold-start modelling, Fault mode diagnosis, Remaining useful life.

Answered from the vendors’ own pages

Nanoprecise Sci Corp: Can I use my own vibration sensors?

No. The platform is built around the MachineDoctor sensor and third-party sensor data is not a supported first-class input.

Novity: What does Novity actually output?

A named failure mode and an estimated remaining useful life with a confidence band, not just an anomaly alert.

Nanoprecise Sci Corp: Do I need a gateway?

For WiFi and LoRa deployments yes. LTE sensors report directly but carry a connectivity cost.

Novity: Do we need failure history to train it?

No. The physics component is what lets it produce useful prognostics on equipment with little or no run-to-failure data.

Nanoprecise Sci Corp: Does it tell me what is wrong or just that something is wrong?

It classifies the fault type and estimates remaining useful life, which is the main reason plants without a vibration analyst choose it.

Novity: Do we need new sensors?

Often not. It reads from your existing historian, but low sampling rates or missing measurements can require additional instrumentation.

Nanoprecise Sci Corp: How is it priced?

Per monitored asset on subscription, plus sensor and gateway hardware. Nothing is published; expect a multi-year agreement.

Novity: Who backs the company?

It was spun out of Xerox PARC and took a strategic investment from Acario Innovation, the venture arm of Tokyo Gas, in 2026.

Share

Related pages

More on Nanoprecise Sci Corp

More on Novity

Keep looking

Other head to heads