Softwr

Insurance · head to head

Novidea vs QQCatalyst

Novidea logo

Novidea

Insurance

Broker and MGA management platform built natively on Salesforce

From
On request
Rated
-
QQCatalyst logo

QQCatalyst

Insurance

Vertafore agency management system for small independent agencies

From
On request
Rated
-

The short version

  • Each has a real cost: Novidea salesforce licences are a separate recurring cost on top of the Novidea subscription, and for a broker with many occasional users that second bill changes the comparison against standalone systems entirely.; QQCatalyst vertafore development investment is concentrated on AMS360 and Sagitta, so QQCatalyst receives maintenance rather than significant new capability and buyers should plan for that.
  • They diverge on capability: Novidea covers Native Salesforce architecture, QQCatalyst covers Client and policy management.
  • Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which Novidea and QQCatalyst actually diverge.

Attributes where Novidea and QQCatalyst differ
AttributeNovideaQQCatalyst
PlatformsWeb, iOS, Android, APIWeb

Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (quote), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Insurance).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in Novidea

  • Native Salesforce architecture
  • Placement and submission tracking
  • Multi-currency and multi-entity
  • Commission and revenue management
  • Analytics
  • Client and broker portals

Only in QQCatalyst

  • Client and policy management
  • Carrier download
  • Workflow and activity tracking
  • Commission tracking
  • Document management
  • Sales pipeline

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

Novidea

  • An international broker consolidating offices that each run a different local agency systemnot QQCatalyst
  • A speciality wholesaler placing non-admitted and Lloyd's business that national agency systems handle poorlynot QQCatalyst
  • An MGA that needs binder, bordereaux and commission tracking in the same place as the client recordnot QQCatalyst
  • A broker group that already standardised on Salesforce and does not want a second client databasenot QQCatalyst

QQCatalyst

  • A small agency moving off spreadsheets and carrier websites to a system with real downloadnot Novidea
  • An agency that wants a Vertafore product without the cost and administration of AMS360not Novidea
  • A start-up agency that needs a policy system of record on day one for carrier appointmentsnot Novidea
  • A retiring principal keeping a small book running with minimal operational overheadnot Novidea

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

Novidea

  • Salesforce licences are a separate recurring cost on top of the Novidea subscription, and for a broker with many occasional users that second bill changes the comparison against standalone systems entirely.
  • It is not built around United States personal lines carrier download, so an agency whose daily work depends on automated policy download from dozens of carriers will find the connectivity thin.
  • Because it inherits Salesforce, it also inherits Salesforce administration; you need someone who knows the platform, and that skill is priced by the Salesforce market rather than the insurance market.
  • Implementations involve mapping an existing book with its history into Salesforce objects, and brokers consistently underestimate how much data cleansing that exposes.
  • Salesforce platform changes and release cycles are outside the vendor control, so an upgrade that alters behaviour you depend on arrives on someone else calendar.

QQCatalyst

  • Vertafore development investment is concentrated on AMS360 and Sagitta, so QQCatalyst receives maintenance rather than significant new capability and buyers should plan for that.
  • Leaving any agency management system is punishing because carrier download connections and years of policy history are bound to the vendor, and QQCatalyst is no exception.
  • Reporting is basic compared with AMS360, so agencies that grow into wanting book analysis end up exporting data and rebuilding reports outside the system.
  • Commercial lines servicing, particularly schedules, certificates at volume and complex account structures, is handled less thoroughly than in systems designed for larger agencies.
  • The upgrade path within the Vertafore portfolio is a migration, not a switch, so growth into AMS360 carries a second implementation and a second data conversion cost.

Pricing, plan by plan

Novidea

On request
  • Novidea Platform$undefined/year
    • Broker management on Salesforce
    • Placement and revenue tracking
    • Analytics dashboards

QQCatalyst

On request
  • QQCatalyst$undefined/year
    • Agency management system
    • Carrier download
    • Commission tracking

Which should you pick?

Choose Novidea if

  • You need native salesforce architecture.
  • You work on Web, iOS, Android, API.
  • You also want placement and submission tracking.

Choose QQCatalyst if

  • You need client and policy management.
  • You also want carrier download.

Questions people ask

Is Novidea or QQCatalyst better?
Neither clearly leads. Novidea starts at On request and QQCatalyst at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, Novidea or QQCatalyst?
Novidea starts at On request and QQCatalyst at On request.
Does Novidea or QQCatalyst run on more platforms?
Novidea runs on Web, iOS, Android, API. QQCatalyst runs on Web.
What is Novidea best used for?
Novidea is most often used for an international broker consolidating offices that each run a different local agency system, a speciality wholesaler placing non-admitted and lloyd's business that national agency systems handle poorly, an mga that needs binder, bordereaux and commission tracking in the same place as the client record, a broker group that already standardised on salesforce and does not want a second client database. Of those, an international broker consolidating offices that each run a different local agency system and a speciality wholesaler placing non-admitted and lloyd's business that national agency systems handle poorly are not what QQCatalyst is typically brought in for.
What can Novidea do that QQCatalyst cannot?
Novidea covers Native Salesforce architecture, Placement and submission tracking, Multi-currency and multi-entity, Commission and revenue management. QQCatalyst covers Client and policy management, Carrier download, Workflow and activity tracking, Commission tracking.

Answered from the vendors’ own pages

Novidea: Do we need to buy Salesforce as well?

Yes. Novidea runs on Salesforce and the underlying platform licences are purchased separately. Include them in every cost comparison.

QQCatalyst: Is QQCatalyst still being sold?

Yes, as the entry point in the Vertafore agency management range. Ask directly about roadmap commitments and the cost of moving to AMS360 later.

Novidea: Is it suitable for a United States retail agency?

Only if your book is commercial or speciality. If you depend on personal lines carrier download, an established agency management system is the better fit.

QQCatalyst: Why is switching agency systems so hard?

Because carrier download is the moat. Re-establishing download across every carrier and migrating policy history is the real cost, and it dwarfs the software fee.

Novidea: What does it replace?

The broker management system and usually a separate CRM, plus the spreadsheets used for commission and receivables tracking.

QQCatalyst: Who should not buy it?

Agencies with substantial commercial lines complexity or an acquisition strategy, both of which push you towards AMS360 or Applied Epic sooner than you expect.

Share

Related pages

Other head to heads