Insurance · head to head
Novidea vs QQCatalyst

Novidea
Insurance
Broker and MGA management platform built natively on Salesforce
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

QQCatalyst
Insurance
Vertafore agency management system for small independent agencies
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Novidea salesforce licences are a separate recurring cost on top of the Novidea subscription, and for a broker with many occasional users that second bill changes the comparison against standalone systems entirely.; QQCatalyst vertafore development investment is concentrated on AMS360 and Sagitta, so QQCatalyst receives maintenance rather than significant new capability and buyers should plan for that.
- They diverge on capability: Novidea covers Native Salesforce architecture, QQCatalyst covers Client and policy management.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Novidea and QQCatalyst actually diverge.
| Attribute | Novidea | QQCatalyst |
|---|---|---|
| Platforms | Web, iOS, Android, API | Web |
Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (quote), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Insurance).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Novidea
- Native Salesforce architecture
- Placement and submission tracking
- Multi-currency and multi-entity
- Commission and revenue management
- Analytics
- Client and broker portals
Only in QQCatalyst
- Client and policy management
- Carrier download
- Workflow and activity tracking
- Commission tracking
- Document management
- Sales pipeline
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Novidea
- An international broker consolidating offices that each run a different local agency systemnot QQCatalyst
- A speciality wholesaler placing non-admitted and Lloyd's business that national agency systems handle poorlynot QQCatalyst
- An MGA that needs binder, bordereaux and commission tracking in the same place as the client recordnot QQCatalyst
- A broker group that already standardised on Salesforce and does not want a second client databasenot QQCatalyst
QQCatalyst
- A small agency moving off spreadsheets and carrier websites to a system with real downloadnot Novidea
- An agency that wants a Vertafore product without the cost and administration of AMS360not Novidea
- A start-up agency that needs a policy system of record on day one for carrier appointmentsnot Novidea
- A retiring principal keeping a small book running with minimal operational overheadnot Novidea
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Novidea
- Salesforce licences are a separate recurring cost on top of the Novidea subscription, and for a broker with many occasional users that second bill changes the comparison against standalone systems entirely.
- It is not built around United States personal lines carrier download, so an agency whose daily work depends on automated policy download from dozens of carriers will find the connectivity thin.
- Because it inherits Salesforce, it also inherits Salesforce administration; you need someone who knows the platform, and that skill is priced by the Salesforce market rather than the insurance market.
- Implementations involve mapping an existing book with its history into Salesforce objects, and brokers consistently underestimate how much data cleansing that exposes.
- Salesforce platform changes and release cycles are outside the vendor control, so an upgrade that alters behaviour you depend on arrives on someone else calendar.
QQCatalyst
- Vertafore development investment is concentrated on AMS360 and Sagitta, so QQCatalyst receives maintenance rather than significant new capability and buyers should plan for that.
- Leaving any agency management system is punishing because carrier download connections and years of policy history are bound to the vendor, and QQCatalyst is no exception.
- Reporting is basic compared with AMS360, so agencies that grow into wanting book analysis end up exporting data and rebuilding reports outside the system.
- Commercial lines servicing, particularly schedules, certificates at volume and complex account structures, is handled less thoroughly than in systems designed for larger agencies.
- The upgrade path within the Vertafore portfolio is a migration, not a switch, so growth into AMS360 carries a second implementation and a second data conversion cost.
Pricing, plan by plan
Novidea
On request- Novidea Platform$undefined/year
- Broker management on Salesforce
- Placement and revenue tracking
- Analytics dashboards
QQCatalyst
On request- QQCatalyst$undefined/year
- Agency management system
- Carrier download
- Commission tracking
Which should you pick?
Choose Novidea if
- You need native salesforce architecture.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android, API.
- You also want placement and submission tracking.
Choose QQCatalyst if
- You need client and policy management.
- You also want carrier download.
Questions people ask
- Is Novidea or QQCatalyst better?
- Neither clearly leads. Novidea starts at On request and QQCatalyst at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Novidea or QQCatalyst?
- Novidea starts at On request and QQCatalyst at On request.
- Does Novidea or QQCatalyst run on more platforms?
- Novidea runs on Web, iOS, Android, API. QQCatalyst runs on Web.
- What is Novidea best used for?
- Novidea is most often used for an international broker consolidating offices that each run a different local agency system, a speciality wholesaler placing non-admitted and lloyd's business that national agency systems handle poorly, an mga that needs binder, bordereaux and commission tracking in the same place as the client record, a broker group that already standardised on salesforce and does not want a second client database. Of those, an international broker consolidating offices that each run a different local agency system and a speciality wholesaler placing non-admitted and lloyd's business that national agency systems handle poorly are not what QQCatalyst is typically brought in for.
- What can Novidea do that QQCatalyst cannot?
- Novidea covers Native Salesforce architecture, Placement and submission tracking, Multi-currency and multi-entity, Commission and revenue management. QQCatalyst covers Client and policy management, Carrier download, Workflow and activity tracking, Commission tracking.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Novidea: Do we need to buy Salesforce as well?
Yes. Novidea runs on Salesforce and the underlying platform licences are purchased separately. Include them in every cost comparison.
QQCatalyst: Is QQCatalyst still being sold?
Yes, as the entry point in the Vertafore agency management range. Ask directly about roadmap commitments and the cost of moving to AMS360 later.
Novidea: Is it suitable for a United States retail agency?
Only if your book is commercial or speciality. If you depend on personal lines carrier download, an established agency management system is the better fit.
QQCatalyst: Why is switching agency systems so hard?
Because carrier download is the moat. Re-establishing download across every carrier and migrating policy history is the real cost, and it dwarfs the software fee.
Novidea: What does it replace?
The broker management system and usually a separate CRM, plus the spreadsheets used for commission and receivables tracking.
QQCatalyst: Who should not buy it?
Agencies with substantial commercial lines complexity or an acquisition strategy, both of which push you towards AMS360 or Applied Epic sooner than you expect.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Novidea vs Applied Epic
- Novidea vs Vertafore AMS360
- Novidea vs AgencyBloc
- Novidea vs Bolt Solutions
- Novidea vs Five Sigma
- Novidea vs INSTANDA
- Novidea vs Verisk
- Novidea vs Origami Risk
- Novidea vs Better Agency
- Novidea vs Bold Penguin
- Novidea vs InsurancePro
- Novidea vs Pie Insurance
- Novidea vs PolicyGenius
- Novidea vs Policyholders
- Novidea vs Root Insurance
- Novidea vs Semsee
- Novidea vs Indio
- Novidea vs EZLynx
- Novidea vs HawkSoft
- Novidea vs Jenesis Software
- Novidea vs InsuredMine
- Novidea vs NowCerts
- Novidea vs BriteCore
- Novidea vs Ivans
- Novidea vs AgencyZoom
- Novidea vs Shift Technology
- Novidea vs Socotra
- Novidea vs Splice Software
- QQCatalyst vs Applied Epic
- QQCatalyst vs Vertafore AMS360
- QQCatalyst vs AgencyBloc
- QQCatalyst vs Bolt Solutions
- QQCatalyst vs Five Sigma
- QQCatalyst vs INSTANDA
- QQCatalyst vs Verisk
- QQCatalyst vs Origami Risk
- QQCatalyst vs Better Agency
- QQCatalyst vs Bold Penguin
- QQCatalyst vs InsurancePro
- QQCatalyst vs Pie Insurance
- QQCatalyst vs PolicyGenius
- QQCatalyst vs Policyholders
- QQCatalyst vs Root Insurance
- QQCatalyst vs Semsee
- QQCatalyst vs Indio
- QQCatalyst vs EZLynx
- QQCatalyst vs HawkSoft
- QQCatalyst vs Jenesis Software
- QQCatalyst vs InsuredMine
- QQCatalyst vs NowCerts
- QQCatalyst vs BriteCore
- QQCatalyst vs Ivans
- QQCatalyst vs AgencyZoom
- QQCatalyst vs Shift Technology
- QQCatalyst vs Socotra
- QQCatalyst vs Splice Software
