Databases · head to head
Ninox vs Presto

Presto
Databases
The Meta-lineage distributed SQL query engine, distinct from the Trino fork
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Ninox free plan limited to 5 users and 5,000 records; Presto the original creators and most of the active contributor base left for Trino in 2020, so Presto has the smaller community, fewer connectors and slower feature delivery of the two branches.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Ninox and Presto actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Databases).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Ninox
Nothing recorded that Presto does not also cover.
Only in Presto
- Federated querying
- In-memory execution
- Open table format support
- Presto C++ workers
- ANSI SQL
- Pluggable connectors
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Ninox
- No-code database solutions for small to medium teamsnot Presto
- Workflow automation and process managementnot Presto
- Customer data and project tracking with custom viewsnot Presto
Presto
- An existing PrestoDB estate that needs continued upgrades rather than a migration to Trinonot Ninox
- A team buying IBM watsonx.data, where Presto is the underlying query enginenot Ninox
- Joining a Hive or Iceberg lake to an operational PostgreSQL database in one query without an ETL stepnot Ninox
- Very large scale interactive SQL where the Meta-tested branch is a specific requirementnot Ninox
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Ninox
- Free plan limited to 5 users and 5,000 records
- API call limits restrict automation on lower tiers (1,000/month free, 10,000/month team)
- Only 7-day history on free plan vs. unlimited on Business
Presto
- The original creators and most of the active contributor base left for Trino in 2020, so Presto has the smaller community, fewer connectors and slower feature delivery of the two branches.
- Documentation, tutorials and Stack Overflow answers for the two projects are frequently mixed up, and a solution written for Trino often does not apply, which costs real debugging time.
- It is a query engine with no storage of its own, so query performance is dictated by your file layout, partitioning and statistics, and a badly organised lake makes Presto look slow.
- Memory-bound execution means a single large join can fail the whole query rather than spilling gracefully, and tuning cluster memory settings is a persistent operational chore.
- Commercial support has consolidated into IBM since the Ahana acquisition, so the independent vendor market that once existed around Presto is largely gone.
Pricing, plan by plan
Ninox
Free- FreeFree
- Up to 5 users
- 100 MB storage
- Up to 5,000 records
- Team$25/month
- 5 GB storage per user
- 50,000 records per user
- 10,000 API calls per user per month
- Business$40/month
- 10 GB storage per user
- 250,000 records per user
- 50,000 API calls per user per month
- Enterprise$null/custom
- Custom pricing available
- Dedicated support
- Custom solutions and governance
Presto
Free- PrestoFree
- Apache 2.0 licence
- Presto Foundation governance under the Linux Foundation
- No node or query limits
Which should you pick?
Choose Presto if
- You need federated querying.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes.
- You also want in-memory execution.
Questions people ask
- Is Ninox or Presto better?
- Neither clearly leads. Ninox starts at Free and Presto at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Ninox or Presto?
- Ninox starts at Free and Presto at Free.
- Does Ninox or Presto run on more platforms?
- Ninox runs on Web. Presto runs on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes.
- Can I use Ninox for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Ninox best used for?
- Ninox is most often used for no-code database solutions for small to medium teams, workflow automation and process management, customer data and project tracking with custom views. Of those, no-code database solutions for small to medium teams and workflow automation and process management are not what Presto is typically brought in for.
- What can Ninox do that Presto cannot?
- Presto covers Federated querying, In-memory execution, Open table format support, Presto C++ workers.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Ninox: How much does Ninox cost?
Ninox is free for individuals with up to 5 users. Team plan is 25 EUR per user per month (billed annually), and Business plan is 40 EUR per user per month (billed annually). Enterprise plans have custom pricing.
SourcePresto: Is this Presto or Trino?
This is PrestoDB, the branch that stayed at Facebook and moved to the Linux Foundation. Trino is the 2020 fork by the original creators.
Ninox: Is Ninox free?
Yes, Ninox offers a free plan for up to 5 users with 100 MB storage and 5,000 records. No payment required to start, and includes all core views: table, form, chart, kanban, maps, and calendar.
SourcePresto: Which should I choose for a new project?
Trino, in most cases. It has the larger community, more connectors and more commercial options.
Ninox: What is Ninox Team plan pricing?
The Team plan costs 25 EUR per user per month (billed annually). It includes 5 GB storage per user, 50,000 records, 10,000 API calls per month per user, and 30-day history. Annual billing is required.
SourcePresto: Who maintains Presto now?
Principally Meta, Uber and IBM, which acquired the Presto vendor Ahana in 2023.
Presto: Is it still actively released?
Yes, releases continue on a regular cadence under the Presto Foundation.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Ninox vs Airtable
- Ninox vs Cockroach Labs
- Ninox vs PostgreSQL
- Ninox vs Amazon Aurora
- Ninox vs Apache Airflow
- Ninox vs Knack
- Ninox vs FaunaDB
- Ninox vs Readyset
- Ninox vs Elasticsearch
- Ninox vs RabbitMQ
- Ninox vs Memcached
- Ninox vs MotherDuck
- Ninox vs Neo4j
- Ninox vs OpenSearch
- Ninox vs Qdrant
- Ninox vs SingleStore
- Ninox vs Cassandra
- Ninox vs Apache Kafka
- Ninox vs ClickHouse
- Ninox vs StarRocks
- Ninox vs Dremio
- Ninox vs DuckDB
- Ninox vs MariaDB
- Ninox vs Meilisearch
- Ninox vs Typesense
- Ninox vs Timeplus
- Ninox vs VerneMQ
- Ninox vs Dragonfly
- Ninox vs Fivetran HVR
- Ninox vs Grist
- Ninox vs IBM Db2
- Ninox vs Instaclustr
- Presto vs Airtable
- Presto vs Cockroach Labs
- Presto vs PostgreSQL
- Presto vs Amazon Aurora
- Presto vs Apache Airflow
- Presto vs Knack
- Presto vs FaunaDB
- Presto vs Readyset
- Presto vs Elasticsearch
- Presto vs RabbitMQ
- Presto vs Memcached
- Presto vs MotherDuck
- Presto vs Neo4j
- Presto vs OpenSearch
- Presto vs Qdrant
- Presto vs SingleStore
- Presto vs Cassandra
- Presto vs Apache Kafka
- Presto vs ClickHouse
- Presto vs StarRocks
- Presto vs Dremio
- Presto vs DuckDB
- Presto vs MariaDB
- Presto vs Meilisearch
- Presto vs Typesense
- Presto vs Timeplus
- Presto vs VerneMQ
- Presto vs Dragonfly
- Presto vs Fivetran HVR
- Presto vs Grist
- Presto vs IBM Db2
- Presto vs Instaclustr

