Databases · head to head
Neo4j vs Presto

Presto
Databases
The Meta-lineage distributed SQL query engine, distinct from the Trino fork
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Neo4j auraDB Free has no service availability SLA, no backups and no point-in-time recovery; Presto the original creators and most of the active contributor base left for Trino in 2020, so Presto has the smaller community, fewer connectors and slower feature delivery of the two branches.
- They diverge on capability: Neo4j covers Native Graph Storage, Presto covers Federated querying.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Neo4j and Presto actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Databases).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Neo4j
- Native Graph Storage
- Cypher Query Language
- ACID Transactions
- High Availability
- Graph Data Science
- Full-text Search
- Native Indexes
- GraphQL
Only in Presto
- Federated querying
- In-memory execution
- Open table format support
- Presto C++ workers
- ANSI SQL
- Pluggable connectors
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Neo4j
- Graph database for learning and explorationnot Presto
- Production workloads requiring high availability and multi-zone redundancynot Presto
- Enterprise deployments needing custom infrastructurenot Presto
Presto
- An existing PrestoDB estate that needs continued upgrades rather than a migration to Trinonot Neo4j
- A team buying IBM watsonx.data, where Presto is the underlying query enginenot Neo4j
- Joining a Hive or Iceberg lake to an operational PostgreSQL database in one query without an ETL stepnot Neo4j
- Very large scale interactive SQL where the Meta-tested branch is a specific requirementnot Neo4j
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Neo4j
- AuraDB Free has no service availability SLA, no backups and no point-in-time recovery
- AuraDB Free imposes limits on node and relationship counts and runs single-zone only
- SSO authentication and role-based access control are excluded from AuraDB Free and AuraDB Professional, starting only at Business Critical at $146 per GB per month with a 2GB minimum cluster
- AuraDB Professional starts at $65 per GB per month with a minimum 1GB cluster and caps at 128GB memory per instance
- AuraDB Professional backups are daily with only 7-day retention, against 30 days on Business Critical
- Customer managed keys and private endpoints are available only on AuraDB Virtual Dedicated Cloud, which is quote only with no published price
- Change data capture, query log forwarding, secondaries and access to Neo4j Professional Services are excluded below the Business Critical tier
- Support on AuraDB Free is community only and AuraDB Professional is best effort, with 24x7 one-hour response starting at Business Critical
- AuraDB Virtual Dedicated Cloud is sold on prepaid contract terms with enterprise commercial negotiation rather than self-serve card payment
Presto
- The original creators and most of the active contributor base left for Trino in 2020, so Presto has the smaller community, fewer connectors and slower feature delivery of the two branches.
- Documentation, tutorials and Stack Overflow answers for the two projects are frequently mixed up, and a solution written for Trino often does not apply, which costs real debugging time.
- It is a query engine with no storage of its own, so query performance is dictated by your file layout, partitioning and statistics, and a badly organised lake makes Presto look slow.
- Memory-bound execution means a single large join can fail the whole query rather than spilling gracefully, and tuning cluster memory settings is a persistent operational chore.
- Commercial support has consolidated into IBM since the Ahana acquisition, so the independent vendor market that once existed around Presto is largely gone.
Pricing, plan by plan
Neo4j
Free- FreeFree
- Learning and exploration access
- No credit card required
- All graph tools included
- AuraDB Professional$65/GB/month
- 1GB minimum cluster
- Hourly billing available ($0.09/hour for 1GB)
- Daily backups with 7-day retention
- AuraDB Business Critical$146/GB/month
- 2GB minimum cluster
- Hourly billing available ($0.40/hour for 2GB)
- Up to 512GB maximum
- Virtual Dedicated Cloud$null/custom
- Custom pricing via sales contact
- Dedicated VPC infrastructure
- Hourly backups with 60-day retention
Presto
Free- PrestoFree
- Apache 2.0 licence
- Presto Foundation governance under the Linux Foundation
- No node or query limits
Which should you pick?
Choose Neo4j if
- You need native graph storage.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Windows, Mac, Docker, Web.
- You also want cypher query language.
Choose Presto if
- You need federated querying.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes.
- You also want in-memory execution.
Questions people ask
- Is Neo4j or Presto better?
- Neither clearly leads. Neo4j starts at Free and Presto at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Neo4j or Presto?
- Neo4j starts at Free and Presto at Free.
- Does Neo4j or Presto run on more platforms?
- Neo4j runs on Linux, Windows, Mac, Docker, Web. Presto runs on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes.
- Can I use Neo4j for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Neo4j best used for?
- Neo4j is most often used for graph database for learning and exploration, production workloads requiring high availability and multi-zone redundancy, enterprise deployments needing custom infrastructure. Of those, graph database for learning and exploration and production workloads requiring high availability and multi-zone redundancy are not what Presto is typically brought in for.
- What can Neo4j do that Presto cannot?
- Neo4j covers Native Graph Storage, Cypher Query Language, ACID Transactions, High Availability. Presto covers Federated querying, In-memory execution, Open table format support, Presto C++ workers.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Neo4j: Is Neo4j free?
Neo4j offers a free tier (AuraDB Free) for learning and exploration with no credit card required. Community Edition is also free and GPL3-licensed. Paid tiers start at $65/GB per month for AuraDB Professional.
SourcePresto: Is this Presto or Trino?
This is PrestoDB, the branch that stayed at Facebook and moved to the Linux Foundation. Trino is the 2020 fork by the original creators.
Neo4j: What does Neo4j's Professional tier include?
AuraDB Professional costs $65/GB per month with a 1GB minimum cluster, includes daily backups with 7-day retention, single-zone availability, and best-effort support. Hourly billing is available at $0.09/hour per GB.
SourcePresto: Which should I choose for a new project?
Trino, in most cases. It has the larger community, more connectors and more commercial options.
Neo4j: What is Neo4j's most advanced pricing tier?
AuraDB Business Critical costs $146/GB per month with a 2GB minimum and includes multi-zone redundancy, 99.95% uptime SLA, 24/7 premium support with one-hour response times, and point-in-time recovery.
SourcePresto: Who maintains Presto now?
Principally Meta, Uber and IBM, which acquired the Presto vendor Ahana in 2023.
Presto: Is it still actively released?
Yes, releases continue on a regular cadence under the Presto Foundation.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Neo4j vs Elasticsearch
- Neo4j vs Cockroach Labs
- Neo4j vs PostgreSQL
- Neo4j vs Airtable
- Neo4j vs Amazon Aurora
- Neo4j vs ArangoDB
- Neo4j vs Dgraph
- Neo4j vs Firebase Realtime Database
- Neo4j vs Couchbase
- Neo4j vs Cassandra
- Neo4j vs Valkey
- Neo4j vs Canary Labs
- Neo4j vs Chroma
- Neo4j vs DynamoDB
- Neo4j vs CouchDB
- Neo4j vs Apache Doris
- Neo4j vs Apache Solr
- Neo4j vs ClickHouse
- Neo4j vs StarRocks
- Neo4j vs Dremio
- Neo4j vs DuckDB
- Neo4j vs MariaDB
- Neo4j vs Apache Kafka
- Neo4j vs Meilisearch
- Neo4j vs Memcached
- Neo4j vs Typesense
- Neo4j vs Timeplus
- Neo4j vs VerneMQ
- Neo4j vs Dragonfly
- Neo4j vs Fivetran HVR
- Neo4j vs Grist
- Neo4j vs IBM Db2
- Neo4j vs Instaclustr
- Presto vs Elasticsearch
- Presto vs Cockroach Labs
- Presto vs PostgreSQL
- Presto vs Airtable
- Presto vs Amazon Aurora
- Presto vs ArangoDB
- Presto vs Dgraph
- Presto vs Firebase Realtime Database
- Presto vs Couchbase
- Presto vs Cassandra
- Presto vs Valkey
- Presto vs Canary Labs
- Presto vs Chroma
- Presto vs DynamoDB
- Presto vs CouchDB
- Presto vs Apache Doris
- Presto vs Apache Solr
- Presto vs ClickHouse
- Presto vs StarRocks
- Presto vs Dremio
- Presto vs DuckDB
- Presto vs MariaDB
- Presto vs Apache Kafka
- Presto vs Meilisearch
- Presto vs Memcached
- Presto vs Typesense
- Presto vs Timeplus
- Presto vs VerneMQ
- Presto vs Dragonfly
- Presto vs Fivetran HVR
- Presto vs Grist
- Presto vs IBM Db2
- Presto vs Instaclustr

