Software · head to head
New Relic vs Prometheus

Prometheus
Software
Open source monitoring and alerting toolkit for cloud native environments
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: New Relic data ingest costs can be high for large-scale deployments with high logging volume, making budgeting difficult; Prometheus not suitable for per-request billing as collected data lacks 100% accuracy
- They diverge on capability: New Relic covers APM, Prometheus covers Multi-dimensional Data Model.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which New Relic and Prometheus actually diverge.
| Attribute | New Relic | Prometheus |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Unknown | open-source |
| Platforms | Web, Api, Mobile | Linux, macOS, Windows |
| Founded | 2008 | 2015 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in New Relic
- APM
- Infrastructure Monitoring
- Log Management
- Browser Monitoring
- Synthetic Monitoring
- Mobile Monitoring
- Kubernetes Monitoring
- AI Ops
Only in Prometheus
- Multi-dimensional Data Model
- PromQL Query Language
- Pull-based Collection
- Service Discovery
- Alerting Rules
- Federation
- Local Storage
- Grafana
Both cover
- Kubernetes
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
New Relic
- Application monitoringnot Prometheus
- Infrastructure monitoring
- Error trackingnot Prometheus
- Performance optimizationnot Prometheus
Prometheus
- Cloud-native monitoring and alertingnot New Relic
- Time-series metrics collectionnot New Relic
- Infrastructure monitoring
Both are used for infrastructure monitoring, on those jobs the choice comes down to price and fit rather than capability.
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
New Relic
- Data ingest costs can be high for large-scale deployments with high logging volume, making budgeting difficult
- Core user licensing model adds complexity to pricing with distinction between full platform users and basic users
- Default logs obfuscation may miss some sensitive patterns requiring custom configuration
- Retention limits even on paid tiers require additional storage for long-term compliance requirements
Prometheus
- Not suitable for per-request billing as collected data lacks 100% accuracy
- Hard limit on scrape body size; large responses cause scrape failure
- Per-scrape sample limit enforced; exceeding limit marks targets as failed
- Not designed for long-term durable storage; optimised for metrics collection
Pricing, plan by plan
New Relic
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the New Relic review.
Prometheus
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the Prometheus review.
Which should you pick?
Choose New Relic if
- You need apm.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Api, Mobile.
- You also want infrastructure monitoring.
Choose Prometheus if
- You need multi-dimensional data model.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, macOS, Windows.
- You also want promql query language.
Questions people ask
- Is New Relic or Prometheus better?
- Neither clearly leads. New Relic starts at Free and Prometheus at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, New Relic or Prometheus?
- New Relic starts at Free and Prometheus at Free.
- Does New Relic or Prometheus run on more platforms?
- New Relic runs on Web, Api, Mobile. Prometheus runs on Linux, macOS, Windows.
- Can I use New Relic for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is New Relic best used for?
- New Relic is most often used for application monitoring, infrastructure monitoring, error tracking, performance optimization. Of those, application monitoring and error tracking are not what Prometheus is typically brought in for.
- What can New Relic do that Prometheus cannot?
- New Relic covers APM, Infrastructure Monitoring, Log Management, Browser Monitoring. Prometheus covers Multi-dimensional Data Model, PromQL Query Language, Pull-based Collection, Service Discovery. Both handle Kubernetes.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
New Relic: Does New Relic offer a free tier?
Yes, New Relic's free tier is perpetual with no credit card required. It includes 100 GB of free data ingest monthly, one Full Platform User with access to all 50+ capabilities, and unlimited Basic Users for querying and dashboard creation.
SourceNew Relic: How much does New Relic cost for paid plans?
Paid plans start at $49 per month per core user. New Relic uses consumption-based pricing where you pay only for what you use. Annual commitment options are available with volume discounts for larger teams.
SourceNew Relic: What data retention is included in New Relic's free tier?
The free tier includes a minimum of 8 days data retention for troubleshooting. Paid plans offer extended retention periods and customizable data retention policies.
SourceNew Relic: How many integrations does New Relic support?
New Relic provides access to 780+ integrations and unlimited hosts at no additional cost. These include monitoring integrations for various cloud services, databases, and applications.
SourceNew Relic: Can I use New Relic to monitor multiple cloud providers?
Yes, New Relic is cloud-agnostic and supports monitoring across AWS, Google Cloud, Azure, and on-premises infrastructure in a single platform.
SourceNew Relic: What is New Relic's ownership structure today?
New Relic was acquired by TPG and Francisco Partners on July 31, 2023, for $6.5 billion and transitioned from a publicly traded company to a private company in November 2023.
SourceRelated pages
Keep looking
Other head to heads
- New Relic vs Elastic Stack
- New Relic vs Datadog Logs
- New Relic vs Coralogix
- New Relic vs Grafana Loki
- New Relic vs CloudWatch
- New Relic vs Dynatrace
- New Relic vs InfluxDB
- New Relic vs Airbrake
- New Relic vs AppDynamics
- New Relic vs Axiom
- New Relic vs Azure Monitor
- New Relic vs Better Stack
- New Relic vs Bugsnag
- New Relic vs Dynatrace Logs
- New Relic vs Elastic
- New Relic vs Elastic APM
- New Relic vs Elasticsearch Service
- New Relic vs ELK Stack
- New Relic vs Cloudflare
- New Relic vs Consul
- New Relic vs Grafana
- New Relic vs Ivanti
- New Relic vs Palo Alto Networks
- New Relic vs Splunk
- New Relic vs Tailscale
- New Relic vs Traefik
- New Relic vs Ubiquiti UniFi
- Prometheus vs Elastic Stack
- Prometheus vs Datadog Logs
- Prometheus vs Coralogix
- Prometheus vs Grafana Loki
- Prometheus vs CloudWatch
- Prometheus vs Dynatrace
- Prometheus vs InfluxDB
- Prometheus vs Airbrake
- Prometheus vs AppDynamics
- Prometheus vs Axiom
- Prometheus vs Azure Monitor
- Prometheus vs Better Stack
- Prometheus vs Bugsnag
- Prometheus vs Dynatrace Logs
- Prometheus vs Elastic
- Prometheus vs Elastic APM
- Prometheus vs Elasticsearch Service
- Prometheus vs ELK Stack
- Prometheus vs Cloudflare
- Prometheus vs Consul
- Prometheus vs Grafana
- Prometheus vs Ivanti
- Prometheus vs Palo Alto Networks
- Prometheus vs Splunk
- Prometheus vs Tailscale
- Prometheus vs Traefik
- Prometheus vs Ubiquiti UniFi

