Softwr

Proposals · head to head

Moxie vs Prospero

Moxie logo

Moxie

Proposals

Freelance business management with proposals, contracts, time tracking and invoicing in one subscription

From
On request
Rated
-
Prospero logo

Prospero

Proposals

Single-plan proposal writer built for freelancers rather than sales teams

From
On request
Rated
-

The short version

  • Each has a real cost: Moxie each module is weaker than the specialist product it replaces, so a freelancer with a demanding requirement in any one area will find the bundled version limiting.; Prospero there is no product catalogue or configure-price-quote logic, so a business selling configurable products with rules and approvals prices every document by hand, with the error rate that implies.
  • They diverge on capability: Moxie covers Proposals with e signature, Prospero covers Template library by discipline.
  • Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which Moxie and Prospero actually diverge.

Attributes where Moxie and Prospero differ
AttributeMoxieProspero
PlatformsWeb, iOS, AndroidWeb

Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (quote), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Proposals).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in Moxie

  • Proposals with e signature
  • Contracts
  • Time tracking
  • Invoicing and payments
  • Client portal
  • Project and task management
  • Scheduling link

Only in Prospero

  • Template library by discipline
  • Electronic signature
  • Reusable content blocks
  • Open tracking
  • Pricing tables
  • Custom branding
  • Multi-currency and multi-language
  • Unlimited proposals

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

Moxie

  • A solo consultant replacing four separate subscriptions for proposals, contracts, time and invoicingnot Prospero
  • A freelancer who needs a signed contract and a deposit invoice to follow proposal acceptance automaticallynot Prospero
  • Retainer work where tracked hours must reconcile against a fixed monthly fee on the same invoicenot Prospero
  • A designer who wants one client portal for files, approvals and payment rather than email threadsnot Prospero

Prospero

  • A freelancer sending a few proposals a month who wants them to look professional without hiring a designernot Moxie
  • Consultants who reuse the same scope and terms language and want it written once and storednot Moxie
  • Anyone currently sending proposals as PDF attachments who wants open tracking and a signaturenot Moxie
  • Very small studios where the entire sales process is one person and a calendarnot Moxie

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

Moxie

  • Each module is weaker than the specialist product it replaces, so a freelancer with a demanding requirement in any one area will find the bundled version limiting.
  • The shared data model that makes the bundle convenient also makes leaving expensive, because proposals, time entries and invoices come out as one tangled export rather than as separable tools.
  • It is designed around a solo operator, so adding subcontractors, splitting revenue or managing a small team runs into limits quickly.
  • Client payments are processed through a third party gateway, so the card processing fee applies on top of the subscription and should be modelled into the true cost per invoice.
  • A large amount of published review material still refers to the product as Hectic, which makes independent research harder and dates much of what is written about it.

Prospero

  • There is no product catalogue or configure-price-quote logic, so a business selling configurable products with rules and approvals prices every document by hand, with the error rate that implies.
  • Team features are shallow: no real approval chain, no content locking to stop junior staff editing legal terms, and no per-role permissions, so it stops scaling as soon as more than two people write proposals.
  • Analytics report that the proposal was opened rather than how long the client spent on each section, so you lose the buying-signal data the sales-oriented tools in this category are sold on.
  • Integration coverage is thin next to PandaDoc or Proposify, so pushing an accepted proposal into a CRM or accounting system usually means Zapier and manual field mapping you maintain yourself.
  • The vendor is very small, which is what keeps the price low, but feature requests move slowly and there is no enterprise support commitment to point at if the service is unavailable in the middle of a deal.

Pricing, plan by plan

Moxie

On request
  • Moxie$undefined/year
    • Proposals, contracts and electronic signature
    • Time tracking and invoicing
    • Client portal

Prospero

On request
  • Prospero$undefined/month
    • Single plan with unlimited proposals
    • Electronic signature included
    • Discount for annual billing

Which should you pick?

Choose Moxie if

  • You need proposals with e signature.
  • You work on Web, iOS, Android.
  • You also want contracts.

Choose Prospero if

  • You need template library by discipline.
  • You also want electronic signature.

Questions people ask

Is Moxie or Prospero better?
Neither clearly leads. Moxie starts at On request and Prospero at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, Moxie or Prospero?
Moxie starts at On request and Prospero at On request.
Does Moxie or Prospero run on more platforms?
Moxie runs on Web, iOS, Android. Prospero runs on Web.
What is Moxie best used for?
Moxie is most often used for a solo consultant replacing four separate subscriptions for proposals, contracts, time and invoicing, a freelancer who needs a signed contract and a deposit invoice to follow proposal acceptance automatically, retainer work where tracked hours must reconcile against a fixed monthly fee on the same invoice, a designer who wants one client portal for files, approvals and payment rather than email threads. Of those, a solo consultant replacing four separate subscriptions for proposals, contracts, time and invoicing and a freelancer who needs a signed contract and a deposit invoice to follow proposal acceptance automatically are not what Prospero is typically brought in for.
What can Moxie do that Prospero cannot?
Moxie covers Proposals with e signature, Contracts, Time tracking, Invoicing and payments. Prospero covers Template library by discipline, Electronic signature, Reusable content blocks, Open tracking.

Answered from the vendors’ own pages

Moxie: Is Moxie the same product as Hectic?

Yes. It was renamed in 2022. Older reviews under the Hectic name describe the same software at an earlier stage.

Prospero: Does it include electronic signature?

Yes. The client signs in the browser at the end of the proposal and you are notified when they do.

Moxie: Does it take a percentage of my invoices?

The payment processor takes its standard card fee. Model that separately from the subscription when comparing total cost.

Prospero: Is it suitable for a sales team?

No. There is no pipeline, no approval workflow and no quoting engine. It is built for one person writing their own proposals.

Moxie: Can I use it with a team?

It is built for a solo operator. Subcontractors and multi person billing are handled awkwardly.

Prospero: Why is no price listed here?

The vendor publishes current pricing and it is among the cheapest in this category, but the plan structure changes, so check the figure at source rather than trusting a cached one.

Moxie: Can I keep my accountant in the loop?

Yes, through the accounting integration, though most freelancers still reconcile manually at year end.

Prospero: Can it handle proposals in other currencies?

Yes. It supports multiple currencies and languages, which matters for freelancers taking clients abroad.

Moxie: What is the exit path?

Exports exist, but the linked proposal, time and invoice data does not map cleanly onto separate replacement tools.

Share

Related pages

Other head to heads