Cybersecurity · head to head
Milestone XProtect vs OWASP ZAP

Milestone XProtect
Cybersecurity
Open platform video management software with perpetual per-device licences
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

OWASP ZAP
Cybersecurity
Free, open-source web application scanner and intercepting proxy, now governed by the Software Security Project.
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Milestone XProtect care Plus is presented as optional but is not in practice: without it, perpetual licences stop receiving version upgrades and eventually you cannot add a current camera because your frozen version does not support it.; OWASP ZAP authenticated scanning of modern single-page applications is the hard part and ZAP makes you build it by hand: session handling, token refresh and login scripts are configured per application, and a misconfigured session means the scanner logs itself out and reports a clean result for pages it never reached.
- They diverge on capability: Milestone XProtect covers Open device support, OWASP ZAP covers Intercepting proxy.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Milestone XProtect and OWASP ZAP actually diverge.
| Attribute | Milestone XProtect | OWASP ZAP |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | One-time purchase per device licence, plus annual Care Plus | free |
| Platforms | Windows, Web, iOS, Android | Desktop, Cli, Api |
| Founded | Unknown | 2001 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cybersecurity).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Milestone XProtect
- Open device support
- Perpetual device licences
- Federated architecture
- Failover recording
- Evidence export
- Smart Map
- Integration platform
- Video summarisation
Only in OWASP ZAP
- Intercepting proxy
- Passive scanner
- Active scanner
- AJAX spider
- Automation Framework
- Headless daemon and REST API
- Docker images
- Add-on marketplace
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Milestone XProtect
- A city or transport operator running tens of thousands of cameras across federated sitesnot OWASP ZAP
- An enterprise with mixed legacy camera brands that refuses to standardise on one manufacturernot OWASP ZAP
- A critical infrastructure site needing failover recording servers and tamper-evident evidence exportnot OWASP ZAP
- An integrator building a bespoke security application on top of an open VMS platformnot OWASP ZAP
OWASP ZAP
- Adding a baseline security scan to every application's pipeline where per-target commercial licensing would limit coverage to a handfulnot Milestone XProtect
- Manual penetration testing that needs an intercepting proxy, request replay and fuzzing without a paid licence per testernot Milestone XProtect
- Teaching developers what an attack against their own endpoint looks like, using a tool they can install themselvesnot Milestone XProtect
- Pre-release regression scanning of an internal application that would never justify a commercial DAST subscriptionnot Milestone XProtect
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Milestone XProtect
- Care Plus is presented as optional but is not in practice: without it, perpetual licences stop receiving version upgrades and eventually you cannot add a current camera because your frozen version does not support it.
- Per-device licensing means multi-sensor and multi-imager cameras consume several licences each, so a headline camera count badly understates the true licence cost of a modern design.
- It is Windows only for servers and needs a properly designed server and storage architecture, so the software price is a fraction of a project that also needs recording servers, storage and an integrator.
- Complexity requires trained staff or a certified integrator; organisations that install it without either end up running a large deployment on default settings and never using the features they paid for.
- Milestone retired Kite from its portfolio in favour of Arcules from January 2025, which stranded buyers who had standardised on Kite and is a reminder that the cloud side of the portfolio has changed direction more than once.
OWASP ZAP
- Authenticated scanning of modern single-page applications is the hard part and ZAP makes you build it by hand: session handling, token refresh and login scripts are configured per application, and a misconfigured session means the scanner logs itself out and reports a clean result for pages it never reached.
- There is no support contract in the product, so when a scan breaks the day before a release the escalation path is a GitHub issue and a community chat, which is not an answer that satisfies a delivery manager or an auditor who wants a named responsible party.
- Active scanning sends genuine attack traffic, so it can create records, trigger emails, exhaust rate limits or destabilise a fragile environment, and pointing it at production without prior agreement produces an incident rather than a test result.
- Output needs triage: passive rules generate large volumes of low-severity informational findings about headers and cookie flags that bury the few results that matter, and a team without someone tuning the rule set stops reading the report within a few sprints.
- As a dynamic scanner it can only test what it can reach, so authorisation flaws between accounts, business logic abuse and anything behind an undiscovered endpoint go unreported, and a passing ZAP scan is evidence of nothing more than the absence of the classes of bug it looks for.
Pricing, plan by plan
Milestone XProtect
Free- XProtect Essential+Free
- Free for up to 8 cameras
- No recording time limit
- No vendor support included
- XProtect Express+$109/one-time
- Perpetual device licence, distributor list price
- Single site, single server
- Care Plus purchased separately per device per year
- XProtect Professional+$177/one-time
- Perpetual device licence, distributor list price
- Multiple recording servers
- Edge storage retrieval
- XProtect Expert$282/one-time
- Perpetual device licence, distributor list price
- Failover recording servers
- Advanced video wall and evidence handling
OWASP ZAP
Free- Free & Open SourceFree
- Full functionality
- Active & passive scanning
- Spider
Which should you pick?
Choose Milestone XProtect if
- You need open device support.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Windows, Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want perpetual device licences.
Choose OWASP ZAP if
- You need intercepting proxy.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Desktop, Cli, Api.
- You also want passive scanner.
Questions people ask
- Is Milestone XProtect or OWASP ZAP better?
- Neither clearly leads. Milestone XProtect starts at Free and OWASP ZAP at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Milestone XProtect or OWASP ZAP?
- Milestone XProtect starts at Free and OWASP ZAP at Free.
- Does Milestone XProtect or OWASP ZAP run on more platforms?
- Milestone XProtect runs on Windows, Web, iOS, Android. OWASP ZAP runs on Desktop, Cli, Api.
- Can I use Milestone XProtect for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Milestone XProtect best used for?
- Milestone XProtect is most often used for a city or transport operator running tens of thousands of cameras across federated sites, an enterprise with mixed legacy camera brands that refuses to standardise on one manufacturer, a critical infrastructure site needing failover recording servers and tamper-evident evidence export, an integrator building a bespoke security application on top of an open vms platform. Of those, a city or transport operator running tens of thousands of cameras across federated sites and an enterprise with mixed legacy camera brands that refuses to standardise on one manufacturer are not what OWASP ZAP is typically brought in for.
- What can Milestone XProtect do that OWASP ZAP cannot?
- Milestone XProtect covers Open device support, Perpetual device licences, Federated architecture, Failover recording. OWASP ZAP covers Intercepting proxy, Passive scanner, Active scanner, AJAX spider.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Milestone XProtect: Is XProtect really free for small sites?
Essential+ is free for up to eight cameras with no recording time limit, but it comes with no vendor support and no multi-server capability.
OWASP ZAP: Is it still called OWASP ZAP?
The project left OWASP in August 2024 and is now governed by the Software Security Project, with core development sponsored by Checkmarx. The tool is now just ZAP, though most existing documentation, courses and search results still use the OWASP name.
Milestone XProtect: Are licences perpetual or annual?
Device licences are perpetual. The annual cost is Care Plus, the support and software update contract, which you need to stay on current versions.
OWASP ZAP: Is it free for commercial use?
Yes. It is Apache 2.0 licensed, with no per-application, per-scan or per-user cost, and it can be used and modified commercially without a licence agreement.
Milestone XProtect: What happens if I do not renew Care Plus?
The system keeps recording, but you stop getting version upgrades, and over a few years that blocks you from adding newer cameras.
OWASP ZAP: Can it replace a penetration test?
No. It automates checks for known vulnerability classes against endpoints it can reach. It does not reason about business logic, chain findings into an attack, or test authorisation between accounts, which is most of what a tester actually does.
Milestone XProtect: Who owns Milestone?
Canon. The portfolio also includes BriefCam analytics and Arcules cloud video, with Arcules replacing Milestone Kite from January 2025.
OWASP ZAP: Does it run in CI?
Yes, through the official Docker images and the Automation Framework, which defines scan jobs in YAML so configuration lives in the repository. A baseline passive scan is the usual starting point because it is fast and non-intrusive.
OWASP ZAP: How does it compare to Burp Suite?
Burp Suite Professional is the more polished manual testing tool and has a stronger scanner and extension ecosystem, but it is licensed per tester and Burp Suite Enterprise per target. ZAP is the better fit where cost per target is the binding constraint; many teams use both.
Related pages
More on Milestone XProtect
Other head to heads
- Milestone XProtect vs VIVOTEK VAST Security Station
- Milestone XProtect vs Salient CompleteView
- Milestone XProtect vs Rhombus Systems
- Milestone XProtect vs Spot AI
- Milestone XProtect vs Motorola Vigilant
- Milestone XProtect vs Genetec Security Center
- Milestone XProtect vs Hanwha Vision
- Milestone XProtect vs Eagle Eye Networks
- Milestone XProtect vs Dahua Technology
- Milestone XProtect vs March Networks
- Milestone XProtect vs Camio
- Milestone XProtect vs Varonis Data Security Platform
- Milestone XProtect vs Ory
- Milestone XProtect vs ProtonVPN
- Milestone XProtect vs Resolver
- Milestone XProtect vs Saviynt
- Milestone XProtect vs Securiti
- Milestone XProtect vs Sigstore
- Milestone XProtect vs 1Password
- Milestone XProtect vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Milestone XProtect vs Norton 360
- Milestone XProtect vs LastPass
- Milestone XProtect vs Bitwarden
- Milestone XProtect vs Burp Suite
- Milestone XProtect vs Metasploit
- Milestone XProtect vs Wireshark
- Milestone XProtect vs authentik
- Milestone XProtect vs Authelia
- Milestone XProtect vs Infisical
- Milestone XProtect vs Trivy
- Milestone XProtect vs Feedzai
- Milestone XProtect vs Frontegg
- Milestone XProtect vs HashiCorp Boundary
- Milestone XProtect vs JumpCloud
- Milestone XProtect vs McAfee Total Protection
- OWASP ZAP vs VIVOTEK VAST Security Station
- OWASP ZAP vs Salient CompleteView
- OWASP ZAP vs Rhombus Systems
- OWASP ZAP vs Spot AI
- OWASP ZAP vs Motorola Vigilant
- OWASP ZAP vs Genetec Security Center
- OWASP ZAP vs Hanwha Vision
- OWASP ZAP vs Eagle Eye Networks
- OWASP ZAP vs Dahua Technology
- OWASP ZAP vs March Networks
- OWASP ZAP vs Camio
- OWASP ZAP vs Varonis Data Security Platform
- OWASP ZAP vs Ory
- OWASP ZAP vs ProtonVPN
- OWASP ZAP vs Resolver
- OWASP ZAP vs Saviynt
- OWASP ZAP vs Securiti
- OWASP ZAP vs Sigstore
- OWASP ZAP vs 1Password
- OWASP ZAP vs Bitdefender Total Security
- OWASP ZAP vs Norton 360
- OWASP ZAP vs LastPass
- OWASP ZAP vs Bitwarden
- OWASP ZAP vs Burp Suite
- OWASP ZAP vs Metasploit
- OWASP ZAP vs Wireshark
- OWASP ZAP vs authentik
- OWASP ZAP vs Authelia
- OWASP ZAP vs Infisical
- OWASP ZAP vs Trivy
- OWASP ZAP vs Feedzai
- OWASP ZAP vs Frontegg
- OWASP ZAP vs HashiCorp Boundary
- OWASP ZAP vs JumpCloud
- OWASP ZAP vs McAfee Total Protection
