Databases · head to head
Memcached vs PostgreSQL

PostgreSQL
Databases
The world's most advanced open source relational database
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Memcached no persistence at all: restart a node and its cache is gone, which every design must assume; PostgreSQL requires manual scaling across multiple machines for very large deployments
- They diverge on capability: Memcached covers In-memory key-value cache, PostgreSQL covers ACID Compliance.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Memcached and PostgreSQL actually diverge.
| Attribute | Memcached | PostgreSQL |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Open source, no licence fee; managed cloud billed separately | Unknown |
| Platforms | Linux, macOS, Windows, Docker, Self-hosted | Linux, Windows, macOS, BSD, Unix |
| Founded | Unknown | 1996 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Databases).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Memcached
- In-memory key-value cache
- Multithreaded
- Client-side sharding
- Predictable memory use
Only in PostgreSQL
- ACID Compliance
- JSON/JSONB Support
- Full-text Search
- Extensibility
- Advanced Indexing
- Partitioning
- Replication
- pgAdmin
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Memcached
- Caching expensive database query results to cut loadnot PostgreSQL
- Session storage where losing sessions on restart is acceptablenot PostgreSQL
- Fronting an API whose responses are costly and change slowlynot PostgreSQL
PostgreSQL
- Transaction processingnot Memcached
- Data storagenot Memcached
- Application backendnot Memcached
- Reportingnot Memcached
- Data analyticsnot Memcached
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Memcached
- No persistence at all: restart a node and its cache is gone, which every design must assume
- No replication or failover, so losing a node loses that share of the cache
- Only simple key-value, with none of the lists, sorted sets or streams Redis offers
- Values are capped at 1MB by default, which surprises teams caching large documents
PostgreSQL
- Requires manual scaling across multiple machines for very large deployments
- Performance tuning requires deep knowledge of database internals
- No built-in graphical admin interface; command-line tools are primary method
Pricing, plan by plan
Memcached
Free- MemcachedFree
- Full functionality
- Self-hosted
- No usage limits
PostgreSQL
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the PostgreSQL review.
Which should you pick?
Choose Memcached if
- You need in-memory key-value cache.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, macOS, Windows, Docker, Self-hosted.
- You also want multithreaded.
Choose PostgreSQL if
- You need acid compliance.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Windows, macOS, BSD, Unix.
- You also want json/jsonb support.
Questions people ask
- Is Memcached or PostgreSQL better?
- Neither clearly leads. Memcached starts at Free and PostgreSQL at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Memcached or PostgreSQL?
- Memcached starts at Free and PostgreSQL at Free.
- Does Memcached or PostgreSQL run on more platforms?
- Memcached runs on Linux, macOS, Windows, Docker, Self-hosted. PostgreSQL runs on Linux, Windows, macOS, BSD, Unix.
- Can I use Memcached for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Memcached best used for?
- Memcached is most often used for caching expensive database query results to cut load, session storage where losing sessions on restart is acceptable, fronting an api whose responses are costly and change slowly. Of those, caching expensive database query results to cut load and session storage where losing sessions on restart is acceptable are not what PostgreSQL is typically brought in for.
- What can Memcached do that PostgreSQL cannot?
- Memcached covers In-memory key-value cache, Multithreaded, Client-side sharding, Predictable memory use. PostgreSQL covers ACID Compliance, JSON/JSONB Support, Full-text Search, Extensibility.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Memcached: Is Memcached free?
Yes, open source with no licence fee.
PostgreSQL: Is PostgreSQL completely free?
Yes. PostgreSQL is completely free and open source with no licensing fees or restrictions on use.
SourceMemcached: Memcached or Redis?
Memcached is a pure cache: simpler, multithreaded and very predictable. Redis adds persistence, replication and rich data structures, which is why it is the default choice unless you specifically want a cache and nothing more.
PostgreSQL: What platforms does PostgreSQL run on?
PostgreSQL runs on all major operating systems including Linux, Windows, macOS, BSD, and commercial Unix variants, and has been proven highly scalable managing terabytes to petabytes of data.
SourceMemcached: Does Memcached persist data?
No. Everything is in memory and lost on restart, by design.
PostgreSQL: What procedural languages are supported?
PostgreSQL supports stored functions and procedures in multiple languages including PL/pgSQL, Perl, Python, Tcl, Java, JavaScript, R, and Rust.
SourcePostgreSQL: What is ACID compliance in PostgreSQL?
PostgreSQL has been ACID-compliant since 2001, ensuring data integrity through atomicity, consistency, isolation, and durability guarantees for all transactions.
SourcePostgreSQL: Does PostgreSQL support JSON data?
Yes. PostgreSQL supports JSON and JSONB data types for storing and querying JSON documents, along with XML and other document formats.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Memcached vs Cockroach Labs
- Memcached vs Airtable
- Memcached vs Amazon Aurora
- Memcached vs Elasticsearch
- Memcached vs Apache Kafka
- Memcached vs PlanetScale
- Memcached vs Meilisearch
- Memcached vs Turso
- Memcached vs Azure SQL
- Memcached vs ClickHouse
- Memcached vs Couchbase
- Memcached vs DuckDB
- Memcached vs MariaDB
- Memcached vs Oracle Database
- Memcached vs DataGrip
- Memcached vs Firebolt
- Memcached vs Google Cloud SQL
- Memcached vs MotherDuck
- PostgreSQL vs Cockroach Labs
- PostgreSQL vs Airtable
- PostgreSQL vs Amazon Aurora
- PostgreSQL vs Elasticsearch
- PostgreSQL vs Apache Kafka
- PostgreSQL vs PlanetScale
- PostgreSQL vs Meilisearch
- PostgreSQL vs Turso
- PostgreSQL vs Azure SQL
- PostgreSQL vs ClickHouse
- PostgreSQL vs Couchbase
- PostgreSQL vs DuckDB
- PostgreSQL vs MariaDB
- PostgreSQL vs Oracle Database
- PostgreSQL vs DataGrip
- PostgreSQL vs Firebolt
- PostgreSQL vs Google Cloud SQL
- PostgreSQL vs MotherDuck

