Databases · head to head
Knack vs Memcached

Knack
Databases
Hosted no-code database and web app builder priced by stored records and storage, with unlimited user accounts on every plan.
- From
- $59/month
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Memcached has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Knack plans are capped by stored records, so an application that logs events or keeps history rather than current state climbs tiers on data volume alone, and archiving old records becomes a permanent maintenance chore rather than a one-off.; Memcached no persistence at all: restart a node and its cache is gone, which every design must assume
- They diverge on capability: Knack covers Visual database builder, Memcached covers In-memory key-value cache.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Knack and Memcached actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Databases).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Knack
- Visual database builder
- User logins and roles
- Page builder
- Unlimited users
- E-commerce
- Automation flows
- Scheduled tasks
- REST API and webhooks
Only in Memcached
- In-memory key-value cache
- Multithreaded
- Client-side sharding
- Predictable memory use
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Knack
- A member or client portal where thousands of external people need their own login and see only their own recordsnot Memcached
- Replacing a shared spreadsheet used by a team that has outgrown it but cannot justify a developer to build a bespoke internal toolnot Memcached
- Inventory, asset or case tracking for a small operations team that needs roles, forms and a record of who changed whatnot Memcached
- A registration or booking application for an association, school or non-profit where the user count is large and the record count stays modestnot Memcached
Memcached
- Caching expensive database query results to cut loadnot Knack
- Session storage where losing sessions on restart is acceptablenot Knack
- Fronting an API whose responses are costly and change slowlynot Knack
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Knack
- Plans are capped by stored records, so an application that logs events or keeps history rather than current state climbs tiers on data volume alone, and archiving old records becomes a permanent maintenance chore rather than a one-off.
- API access is capped per day, at 1,000 calls on the entry plan and 10,000 at the Corporate tier, so a scheduled sync or a busy automation can exhaust the day's quota before the working day ends and integrations then fail silently.
- The application itself cannot be exported or self-hosted; records can be downloaded but the pages, roles, flows and business logic exist only inside Knack, so outgrowing the platform means rebuilding the app rather than moving it.
- Customisation beyond the builder is limited to injected CSS and JavaScript that Knack's support does not cover, so any non-standard interface behaviour becomes yours to maintain against a DOM the vendor can change without warning.
- Compliance capabilities that regulated buyers assume are baseline, HIPAA and GovCloud options, advanced SSO, IP restrictions and private environments, are gated to the Corporate and Enterprise tiers, so a small regulated pilot cannot legitimately start on an entry plan.
Memcached
- No persistence at all: restart a node and its cache is gone, which every design must assume
- No replication or failover, so losing a node loses that share of the cache
- Only simple key-value, with none of the lists, sorted sets or streams Redis offers
- Values are capped at 1MB by default, which surprises teams caching large documents
Pricing, plan by plan
Knack
$59/month- Starter$59/month
- 20,000 database records
- Unlimited users, tables, fields
- 25 AI credits
- Pro$130/month
- 50,000 database records
- Remove Knack branding
- E-commerce payments
- Corporate$300/month
- 125,000-2.5M database records
- App restore functionality
- Advanced SSO
- Enterprise$null/month
- Dedicated account manager
- HIPAA/GovCloud-based options
- Custom pricing
Memcached
Free- MemcachedFree
- Full functionality
- Self-hosted
- No usage limits
Which should you pick?
Choose Memcached if
- You need in-memory key-value cache.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, macOS, Windows, Docker, Self-hosted.
- You also want multithreaded.
Questions people ask
- Is Knack or Memcached better?
- Neither clearly leads. Knack starts at $59/month and Memcached at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Knack or Memcached?
- Memcached has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at $59/month for Knack and Free for Memcached.
- Does Knack or Memcached run on more platforms?
- Knack runs on Web. Memcached runs on Linux, macOS, Windows, Docker, Self-hosted.
- Can I use Memcached for free?
- Yes. Memcached has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Knack starts at $59/month.
- What is Knack best used for?
- Knack is most often used for a member or client portal where thousands of external people need their own login and see only their own records, replacing a shared spreadsheet used by a team that has outgrown it but cannot justify a developer to build a bespoke internal tool, inventory, asset or case tracking for a small operations team that needs roles, forms and a record of who changed what, a registration or booking application for an association, school or non-profit where the user count is large and the record count stays modest. Of those, a member or client portal where thousands of external people need their own login and see only their own records and replacing a shared spreadsheet used by a team that has outgrown it but cannot justify a developer to build a bespoke internal tool are not what Memcached is typically brought in for.
- What can Knack do that Memcached cannot?
- Knack covers Visual database builder, User logins and roles, Page builder, Unlimited users. Memcached covers In-memory key-value cache, Multithreaded, Client-side sharding, Predictable memory use.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Knack: Is Knack charged per user?
No. User accounts are unlimited on all plans. Plans are bounded by stored record count, file storage, API calls per day and automation transactions.
Memcached: Is Memcached free?
Yes, open source with no licence fee.
Knack: What happens when I exceed the record limit?
You move to a higher tier or reduce stored records. Because the limit is on data rather than people, apps that accumulate history hit it while apps that track a fixed set of entities generally do not.
Memcached: Memcached or Redis?
Memcached is a pure cache: simpler, multithreaded and very predictable. Redis adds persistence, replication and rich data structures, which is why it is the default choice unless you specifically want a cache and nothing more.
Knack: Can I export my application or self-host it?
You can export record data. The application itself, its pages, roles, permissions and flows, is not exportable and cannot be self-hosted, so leaving means rebuilding elsewhere.
Memcached: Does Memcached persist data?
No. Everything is in memory and lost on restart, by design.
Knack: Is it suitable for public-facing portals?
That is its strongest case, because logins are unlimited and role-based permissions are built in. The constraint is record volume and API throughput, not audience size.
Knack: Can I use it for regulated data?
HIPAA-aligned and government cloud options exist but only on the Enterprise tier, along with private server environments. Lower tiers should not be used for regulated workloads.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Knack vs Airtable
- Knack vs Cockroach Labs
- Knack vs PostgreSQL
- Knack vs Amazon Aurora
- Knack vs BigQuery
- Knack vs Firebase Realtime Database
- Knack vs Dremio
- Knack vs DuckDB
- Knack vs Immuta
- Knack vs Turso
- Knack vs FaunaDB
- Knack vs Ninox
- Knack vs TimescaleDB
- Knack vs Apache Pinot
- Knack vs Amazon RDS
- Knack vs Apache Pulsar
- Knack vs Amazon Redshift
- Knack vs Dragonfly
- Knack vs Valkey
- Knack vs Readyset
- Knack vs DynamoDB
- Knack vs NATS
- Knack vs Presto
- Knack vs Timeplus
- Knack vs RabbitMQ
- Knack vs EMQX
- Knack vs MotherDuck
- Knack vs Neo4j
- Knack vs Apache Kafka
- Knack vs Firestore
- Memcached vs Airtable
- Memcached vs Cockroach Labs
- Memcached vs PostgreSQL
- Memcached vs Amazon Aurora
- Memcached vs BigQuery
- Memcached vs Firebase Realtime Database
- Memcached vs Dremio
- Memcached vs DuckDB
- Memcached vs Immuta
- Memcached vs Turso
- Memcached vs FaunaDB
- Memcached vs Ninox
- Memcached vs TimescaleDB
- Memcached vs Apache Pinot
- Memcached vs Amazon RDS
- Memcached vs Apache Pulsar
- Memcached vs Amazon Redshift
- Memcached vs Dragonfly
- Memcached vs Valkey
- Memcached vs Readyset
- Memcached vs DynamoDB
- Memcached vs NATS
- Memcached vs Presto
- Memcached vs Timeplus
- Memcached vs RabbitMQ
- Memcached vs EMQX
- Memcached vs MotherDuck
- Memcached vs Neo4j
- Memcached vs Apache Kafka
- Memcached vs Firestore
