Databases · head to head
Memcached vs New Relic
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Memcached no persistence at all: restart a node and its cache is gone, which every design must assume; New Relic data ingest costs can be high for large-scale deployments with high logging volume, making budgeting difficult
- They diverge on capability: Memcached covers In-memory key-value cache, New Relic covers APM.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Memcached and New Relic actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Memcached
- In-memory key-value cache
- Multithreaded
- Client-side sharding
- Predictable memory use
Only in New Relic
- APM
- Infrastructure Monitoring
- Log Management
- Browser Monitoring
- Synthetic Monitoring
- Mobile Monitoring
- Kubernetes Monitoring
- AI Ops
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Memcached
- Caching expensive database query results to cut loadnot New Relic
- Session storage where losing sessions on restart is acceptablenot New Relic
- Fronting an API whose responses are costly and change slowlynot New Relic
New Relic
- Application monitoringnot Memcached
- Infrastructure monitoringnot Memcached
- Error trackingnot Memcached
- Performance optimizationnot Memcached
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Memcached
- No persistence at all: restart a node and its cache is gone, which every design must assume
- No replication or failover, so losing a node loses that share of the cache
- Only simple key-value, with none of the lists, sorted sets or streams Redis offers
- Values are capped at 1MB by default, which surprises teams caching large documents
New Relic
- Data ingest costs can be high for large-scale deployments with high logging volume, making budgeting difficult
- Core user licensing model adds complexity to pricing with distinction between full platform users and basic users
- Default logs obfuscation may miss some sensitive patterns requiring custom configuration
- Retention limits even on paid tiers require additional storage for long-term compliance requirements
Pricing, plan by plan
Memcached
Free- MemcachedFree
- Full functionality
- Self-hosted
- No usage limits
New Relic
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the New Relic review.
Which should you pick?
Choose Memcached if
- You need in-memory key-value cache.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, macOS, Windows, Docker, Self-hosted.
- You also want multithreaded.
Choose New Relic if
- You need apm.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Api, Mobile.
- You also want infrastructure monitoring.
Questions people ask
- Is Memcached or New Relic better?
- Neither clearly leads. Memcached starts at Free and New Relic at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Memcached or New Relic?
- Memcached starts at Free and New Relic at Free.
- Does Memcached or New Relic run on more platforms?
- Memcached runs on Linux, macOS, Windows, Docker, Self-hosted. New Relic runs on Web, Api, Mobile.
- Can I use Memcached for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Memcached best used for?
- Memcached is most often used for caching expensive database query results to cut load, session storage where losing sessions on restart is acceptable, fronting an api whose responses are costly and change slowly. Of those, caching expensive database query results to cut load and session storage where losing sessions on restart is acceptable are not what New Relic is typically brought in for.
- What can Memcached do that New Relic cannot?
- Memcached covers In-memory key-value cache, Multithreaded, Client-side sharding, Predictable memory use. New Relic covers APM, Infrastructure Monitoring, Log Management, Browser Monitoring.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Memcached: Is Memcached free?
Yes, open source with no licence fee.
New Relic: Does New Relic offer a free tier?
Yes, New Relic's free tier is perpetual with no credit card required. It includes 100 GB of free data ingest monthly, one Full Platform User with access to all 50+ capabilities, and unlimited Basic Users for querying and dashboard creation.
SourceMemcached: Memcached or Redis?
Memcached is a pure cache: simpler, multithreaded and very predictable. Redis adds persistence, replication and rich data structures, which is why it is the default choice unless you specifically want a cache and nothing more.
New Relic: How much does New Relic cost for paid plans?
Paid plans start at $49 per month per core user. New Relic uses consumption-based pricing where you pay only for what you use. Annual commitment options are available with volume discounts for larger teams.
SourceMemcached: Does Memcached persist data?
No. Everything is in memory and lost on restart, by design.
New Relic: What data retention is included in New Relic's free tier?
The free tier includes a minimum of 8 days data retention for troubleshooting. Paid plans offer extended retention periods and customizable data retention policies.
SourceNew Relic: How many integrations does New Relic support?
New Relic provides access to 780+ integrations and unlimited hosts at no additional cost. These include monitoring integrations for various cloud services, databases, and applications.
SourceNew Relic: Can I use New Relic to monitor multiple cloud providers?
Yes, New Relic is cloud-agnostic and supports monitoring across AWS, Google Cloud, Azure, and on-premises infrastructure in a single platform.
SourceNew Relic: What is New Relic's ownership structure today?
New Relic was acquired by TPG and Francisco Partners on July 31, 2023, for $6.5 billion and transitioned from a publicly traded company to a private company in November 2023.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Memcached vs Dragonfly
- Memcached vs Valkey
- Memcached vs Readyset
- Memcached vs PostgreSQL
- Memcached vs DuckDB
- Memcached vs DynamoDB
- Memcached vs NATS
- Memcached vs Apache Pulsar
- Memcached vs Presto
- Memcached vs Timeplus
- Memcached vs RabbitMQ
- Memcached vs EMQX
- Memcached vs FaunaDB
- Memcached vs Firebase Realtime Database
- Memcached vs MotherDuck
- Memcached vs Neo4j
- Memcached vs Apache Kafka
- Memcached vs Firestore
- Memcached vs CloudWatch
- Memcached vs Elastic APM
- Memcached vs Fluent Bit
- Memcached vs Loggly
- Memcached vs Datadog Logs
- Memcached vs Coralogix
- Memcached vs Grafana Loki
- Memcached vs Dynatrace
- Memcached vs Airbrake
- Memcached vs AppDynamics
- Memcached vs Better Stack
- Memcached vs Bugsnag
- Memcached vs Elastic Stack
- Memcached vs Fluentd
- Memcached vs Dynatrace Logs
- Memcached vs Elastic
- Memcached vs Elasticsearch Service
- New Relic vs Dragonfly
- New Relic vs Valkey
- New Relic vs Readyset
- New Relic vs PostgreSQL
- New Relic vs DuckDB
- New Relic vs DynamoDB
- New Relic vs NATS
- New Relic vs Apache Pulsar
- New Relic vs Presto
- New Relic vs Timeplus
- New Relic vs RabbitMQ
- New Relic vs EMQX
- New Relic vs FaunaDB
- New Relic vs Firebase Realtime Database
- New Relic vs MotherDuck
- New Relic vs Neo4j
- New Relic vs Apache Kafka
- New Relic vs Firestore
- New Relic vs CloudWatch
- New Relic vs Elastic APM
- New Relic vs Fluent Bit
- New Relic vs Loggly
- New Relic vs Datadog Logs
- New Relic vs Coralogix
- New Relic vs Grafana Loki
- New Relic vs Dynatrace
- New Relic vs Airbrake
- New Relic vs AppDynamics
- New Relic vs Better Stack
- New Relic vs Bugsnag
- New Relic vs Elastic Stack
- New Relic vs Fluentd
- New Relic vs Dynatrace Logs
- New Relic vs Elastic
- New Relic vs Elasticsearch Service

