Cybersecurity · head to head
Motorola Vigilant vs Ping Identity

Motorola Vigilant
Cybersecurity
Fixed and mobile licence plate recognition with a shared law enforcement plate database
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Ping Identity
Cybersecurity
Enterprise identity for workforce and customers, with a 5,000 user floor
- From
- $3/month
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Motorola Vigilant state law can decide eligibility outright: California's SB 34 imposes operator duties and restricts sharing ALPR data with out-of-state and federal agencies, and agencies have been audited and found non-compliant.; Ping Identity workforce pricing carries a 5,000 user annual minimum, so an organisation with 800 staff pays for 5,000 and the effective per user cost is over six times the list rate.
- They diverge on capability: Motorola Vigilant covers Fixed LPR cameras, Ping Identity covers Single sign-on.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Motorola Vigilant and Ping Identity actually diverge.
| Attribute | Motorola Vigilant | Ping Identity |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | On request | $3/month |
| Pricing model | quote | Per user per month |
| Platforms | Web, Windows, iOS, Android | Web, Linux, Windows |
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cybersecurity).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Motorola Vigilant
- Fixed LPR cameras
- Mobile LPR
- LEARN database
- VehicleManager analytics
- Hotlist alerting
- Published API
- Audit logging
Only in Ping Identity
- Single sign-on
- Adaptive MFA
- Identity orchestration
- API access management
- Directory services
- Flexible deployment
- ForgeRock capabilities
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Motorola Vigilant
- A police department building a hotlist alerting network on arterial roads into a jurisdictionnot Ping Identity
- An investigator reconstructing a suspect vehicle's movements across multiple agency jurisdictionsnot Ping Identity
- A toll or parking authority enforcing against a registered vehicle listnot Ping Identity
- A sheriff's office locating a vehicle associated with an active AMBER or missing person alertnot Ping Identity
Ping Identity
- A bank that must keep identity data on premises in one country while running SaaS identity elsewherenot Motorola Vigilant
- An airline or telco with tens of millions of customer identities needing a directory that holds that scalenot Motorola Vigilant
- An enterprise assembling authentication journeys that call several external verification and risk vendorsnot Motorola Vigilant
- An existing ForgeRock customer deciding what its upgrade path looks like under Ping ownershipnot Motorola Vigilant
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Motorola Vigilant
- State law can decide eligibility outright: California's SB 34 imposes operator duties and restricts sharing ALPR data with out-of-state and federal agencies, and agencies have been audited and found non-compliant.
- Local surveillance technology ordinances increasingly require a published usage policy, retention limits and a public council hearing before purchase, which can add many months or block the procurement entirely.
- Motorola has faced litigation over its dual role as ALPR operator and end user, so the legal exposure of the data-sharing model is unresolved and sits partly with the purchasing agency.
- The value comes from the shared LEARN database, which means the capability an agency actually buys depends on what other agencies contribute, and that can shrink if peers withdraw for legal or political reasons.
- Nothing is published on price, and camera hardware, database subscription and analytics are separate line items, so the multi-year total is far higher than the initial camera quote suggests.
Ping Identity
- Workforce pricing carries a 5,000 user annual minimum, so an organisation with 800 staff pays for 5,000 and the effective per user cost is over six times the list rate.
- Adaptive multi-factor authentication is in the Plus tier only, doubling the per user price for a capability many buyers assume is standard in a modern identity platform.
- ForgeRock no longer exists as an independent product, so customers who chose it specifically to avoid Ping now face a roadmap set by the vendor they did not pick.
- Thoma Bravo ownership across both merged companies means the commercial priority is margin, and buyers report firmer renewal negotiations than they saw before 2022.
- The portfolio has overlapping components from three product lineages, so scoping a deployment requires vendor architects and the licensing conversation is more complicated than the price list implies.
Pricing, plan by plan
Motorola Vigilant
On request- Vigilant LPR$undefined/year
- Fixed and mobile camera hardware quoted per unit
- LEARN database access subscribed per agency
- Analytics software licensed separately
Ping Identity
$3/month- PingOne for Workforce Essential$3/month
- Minimum 5,000 users billed annually
- Single sign-on and directory services
- OAuth 2.0, OpenID Connect, SAML and SCIM
- PingOne for Workforce Plus$6/month
- Minimum 5,000 users billed annually
- Everything in Essential
- Adaptive multi-factor authentication
- PingOne for Customers Essential$35000/year
- Flat annual fee
- No-code identity orchestration
- Unified customer profiles
- PingOne for Customers Plus$50000/year
- Flat annual fee
- Everything in Essential
- Adaptive MFA and device management
Which should you pick?
Choose Motorola Vigilant if
- You need fixed lpr cameras.
- You work on Web, Windows, iOS, Android.
- You also want mobile lpr.
Choose Ping Identity if
- You need single sign-on.
- You work on Web, Linux, Windows.
- You also want adaptive mfa.
Questions people ask
- Is Motorola Vigilant or Ping Identity better?
- Neither clearly leads. Motorola Vigilant starts at On request and Ping Identity at $3/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Motorola Vigilant or Ping Identity?
- Motorola Vigilant starts at On request and Ping Identity at $3/month.
- Does Motorola Vigilant or Ping Identity run on more platforms?
- Motorola Vigilant runs on Web, Windows, iOS, Android. Ping Identity runs on Web, Linux, Windows.
- What is Motorola Vigilant best used for?
- Motorola Vigilant is most often used for a police department building a hotlist alerting network on arterial roads into a jurisdiction, an investigator reconstructing a suspect vehicle's movements across multiple agency jurisdictions, a toll or parking authority enforcing against a registered vehicle list, a sheriff's office locating a vehicle associated with an active amber or missing person alert. Of those, a police department building a hotlist alerting network on arterial roads into a jurisdiction and an investigator reconstructing a suspect vehicle's movements across multiple agency jurisdictions are not what Ping Identity is typically brought in for.
- What can Motorola Vigilant do that Ping Identity cannot?
- Motorola Vigilant covers Fixed LPR cameras, Mobile LPR, LEARN database, VehicleManager analytics. Ping Identity covers Single sign-on, Adaptive MFA, Identity orchestration, API access management.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Motorola Vigilant: What is LEARN?
The Law Enforcement Archival Reporting Network, the shared database where plate reads from subscribing agencies are stored and queried. It is the core of the product.
Ping Identity: Can I still buy ForgeRock?
Not as a separate product. Ping acquired ForgeRock in 2023 and the capabilities are sold within the Ping portfolio. Existing customers should ask about the specific migration path for their components.
Motorola Vigilant: Can any agency buy it?
No. Several states restrict ALPR use and data sharing, and many municipalities require a published usage policy and a public hearing first. Check statute and local ordinance before budgeting.
Ping Identity: What is the real minimum spend?
PingOne for Workforce Essential is 3 USD per user per month with a 5,000 user annual minimum, so roughly 180,000 USD a year before anything else.
Motorola Vigilant: Does California allow sharing with federal agencies?
SB 34 restricts sharing ALPR information with out-of-state and federal agencies, and California agencies have been audited on precisely that point.
Ping Identity: Is MFA included?
Basic authentication policies are in Essential. Adaptive MFA and passwordless require the Plus tier at 6 USD per user per month.
Motorola Vigilant: Is it only for police?
No. Toll and parking authorities, and some commercial repossession and insurance operations, also use LPR, though the LEARN law enforcement network is agency restricted.
Related pages
More on Motorola Vigilant
More on Ping Identity
Other head to heads
- Motorola Vigilant vs Rhombus Systems
- Motorola Vigilant vs Milestone XProtect
- Motorola Vigilant vs Genetec Security Center
- Motorola Vigilant vs NICE Actimize
- Motorola Vigilant vs Salient CompleteView
- Motorola Vigilant vs LogicManager
- Motorola Vigilant vs Trend Micro Vision One
- Motorola Vigilant vs OWASP ZAP
- Motorola Vigilant vs BigID
- Motorola Vigilant vs Eagle Eye Networks
- Motorola Vigilant vs Camio
- Motorola Vigilant vs Doppler
- Motorola Vigilant vs Brave Browser
- Motorola Vigilant vs March Networks
- Motorola Vigilant vs Sumsub
- Motorola Vigilant vs Tuta
- Motorola Vigilant vs Entrust Identity as a Service
- Motorola Vigilant vs Frontegg
- Motorola Vigilant vs Speakeasy
- Motorola Vigilant vs Akeyless
- Motorola Vigilant vs authentik
- Motorola Vigilant vs Logto
- Motorola Vigilant vs Authelia
- Motorola Vigilant vs Transmit Security
- Motorola Vigilant vs Delinea
- Motorola Vigilant vs VMware Carbon Black
- Motorola Vigilant vs Yoti
- Motorola Vigilant vs Avast One
- Motorola Vigilant vs Chainguard
- Motorola Vigilant vs Cosign
- Motorola Vigilant vs CyberGhost VPN
- Ping Identity vs Rhombus Systems
- Ping Identity vs Milestone XProtect
- Ping Identity vs Genetec Security Center
- Ping Identity vs NICE Actimize
- Ping Identity vs Salient CompleteView
- Ping Identity vs LogicManager
- Ping Identity vs Trend Micro Vision One
- Ping Identity vs OWASP ZAP
- Ping Identity vs BigID
- Ping Identity vs Eagle Eye Networks
- Ping Identity vs Camio
- Ping Identity vs Doppler
- Ping Identity vs Brave Browser
- Ping Identity vs March Networks
- Ping Identity vs Sumsub
- Ping Identity vs Tuta
- Ping Identity vs Entrust Identity as a Service
- Ping Identity vs Frontegg
- Ping Identity vs Speakeasy
- Ping Identity vs Akeyless
- Ping Identity vs authentik
- Ping Identity vs Logto
- Ping Identity vs Authelia
- Ping Identity vs Transmit Security
- Ping Identity vs Delinea
- Ping Identity vs VMware Carbon Black
- Ping Identity vs Yoti
- Ping Identity vs Avast One
- Ping Identity vs Chainguard
- Ping Identity vs Cosign
- Ping Identity vs CyberGhost VPN
