Cybersecurity · head to head
Ping Identity vs WireGuard

Ping Identity
Cybersecurity
Enterprise identity for workforce and customers, with a 5,000 user floor
- From
- $3/month
- Rated
- -

WireGuard
Cybersecurity
Modern, minimal-complexity VPN protocol with state-of-the-art cryptography
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only WireGuard has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Ping Identity workforce pricing carries a 5,000 user annual minimum, so an organisation with 800 staff pays for 5,000 and the effective per user cost is over six times the list rate.; WireGuard manual key management required; WireGuard does not provide automated peer discovery or key distribution mechanisms
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Ping Identity and WireGuard actually diverge.
| Attribute | Ping Identity | WireGuard |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $3/month | Free |
| Pricing model | Per user per month | open-source |
| Free tier | No | Yes |
| Platforms | Web, Linux, Windows | Linux, Windows, macOS, iOS, Android, FreeBSD, OpenBSD |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cybersecurity).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Ping Identity
- Single sign-on
- Adaptive MFA
- Identity orchestration
- API access management
- Directory services
- Flexible deployment
- ForgeRock capabilities
Only in WireGuard
Nothing recorded that Ping Identity does not also cover.
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Ping Identity
- A bank that must keep identity data on premises in one country while running SaaS identity elsewherenot WireGuard
- An airline or telco with tens of millions of customer identities needing a directory that holds that scalenot WireGuard
- An enterprise assembling authentication journeys that call several external verification and risk vendorsnot WireGuard
- An existing ForgeRock customer deciding what its upgrade path looks like under Ping ownershipnot WireGuard
WireGuard
- Site-to-site VPN connectivity for datacentres and branch officesnot Ping Identity
- High-performance VPN applications requiring minimal latency and CPU overheadnot Ping Identity
- Embedded systems and IoT devices with strict memory and storage constraintsnot Ping Identity
- WireGuard-based managed services (Tailscale, Mullvad VPN) providing abstraction over raw protocolnot Ping Identity
- Kernel module for Linux-based VPN appliances and firewallsnot Ping Identity
- Research and development in cryptographic protocol designnot Ping Identity
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Ping Identity
- Workforce pricing carries a 5,000 user annual minimum, so an organisation with 800 staff pays for 5,000 and the effective per user cost is over six times the list rate.
- Adaptive multi-factor authentication is in the Plus tier only, doubling the per user price for a capability many buyers assume is standard in a modern identity platform.
- ForgeRock no longer exists as an independent product, so customers who chose it specifically to avoid Ping now face a roadmap set by the vendor they did not pick.
- Thoma Bravo ownership across both merged companies means the commercial priority is margin, and buyers report firmer renewal negotiations than they saw before 2022.
- The portfolio has overlapping components from three product lineages, so scoping a deployment requires vendor architects and the licensing conversation is more complicated than the price list implies.
WireGuard
- Manual key management required; WireGuard does not provide automated peer discovery or key distribution mechanisms
- No built-in support for address allocation or DHCP; all IP assignments must be manually configured
- Limited to UDP; TCP encapsulation requires wrapper tools, making it unsuitable for environments blocking UDP
- Stateless protocol design means lost packets trigger peer disconnection rather than transparent reconnection
- Requires operational expertise to securely configure and deploy; not suitable for non-technical users without wrapper tools (Tailscale, Mullvad)
Pricing, plan by plan
Ping Identity
$3/month- PingOne for Workforce Essential$3/month
- Minimum 5,000 users billed annually
- Single sign-on and directory services
- OAuth 2.0, OpenID Connect, SAML and SCIM
- PingOne for Workforce Plus$6/month
- Minimum 5,000 users billed annually
- Everything in Essential
- Adaptive multi-factor authentication
- PingOne for Customers Essential$35000/year
- Flat annual fee
- No-code identity orchestration
- Unified customer profiles
- PingOne for Customers Plus$50000/year
- Flat annual fee
- Everything in Essential
- Adaptive MFA and device management
WireGuard
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the WireGuard review.
Which should you pick?
Choose Ping Identity if
- You need single sign-on.
- You work on Web, Linux, Windows.
- You also want adaptive mfa.
Choose WireGuard if
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Windows, macOS, iOS, Android, FreeBSD, OpenBSD.
Questions people ask
- Is Ping Identity or WireGuard better?
- Neither clearly leads. Ping Identity starts at $3/month and WireGuard at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Ping Identity or WireGuard?
- WireGuard has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at $3/month for Ping Identity and Free for WireGuard.
- Does Ping Identity or WireGuard run on more platforms?
- Ping Identity runs on Web, Linux, Windows. WireGuard runs on Linux, Windows, macOS, iOS, Android, FreeBSD, OpenBSD.
- Can I use WireGuard for free?
- Yes. WireGuard has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Ping Identity starts at $3/month.
- What is Ping Identity best used for?
- Ping Identity is most often used for a bank that must keep identity data on premises in one country while running saas identity elsewhere, an airline or telco with tens of millions of customer identities needing a directory that holds that scale, an enterprise assembling authentication journeys that call several external verification and risk vendors, an existing forgerock customer deciding what its upgrade path looks like under ping ownership. Of those, a bank that must keep identity data on premises in one country while running saas identity elsewhere and an airline or telco with tens of millions of customer identities needing a directory that holds that scale are not what WireGuard is typically brought in for.
- What can Ping Identity do that WireGuard cannot?
- Ping Identity covers Single sign-on, Adaptive MFA, Identity orchestration, API access management.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Ping Identity: Can I still buy ForgeRock?
Not as a separate product. Ping acquired ForgeRock in 2023 and the capabilities are sold within the Ping portfolio. Existing customers should ask about the specific migration path for their components.
WireGuard: Is WireGuard free?
Yes, WireGuard is free and open-source software. The Linux kernel module is licensed under GPLv2; implementations for other platforms use MIT or Apache 2.0 licences. There are no licensing fees.
SourcePing Identity: What is the real minimum spend?
PingOne for Workforce Essential is 3 USD per user per month with a 5,000 user annual minimum, so roughly 180,000 USD a year before anything else.
WireGuard: How does WireGuard differ from IPsec and OpenVPN?
WireGuard replaces complex negotiation protocols and state machines with simple public-key cryptography. Its code is roughly 100 times smaller than IPsec, making it faster to audit, deploy, and maintain. It uses modern cryptographic primitives rather than legacy algorithms.
SourcePing Identity: Is MFA included?
Basic authentication policies are in Essential. Adaptive MFA and passwordless require the Plus tier at 6 USD per user per month.
WireGuard: Can I use WireGuard for a commercial VPN service?
Yes. Several commercial VPN services (Mullvad, IVPN, ProtonVPN) use WireGuard as their underlying protocol. You must implement peer management, key distribution, and endpoint selection on top of the WireGuard protocol.
SourceRelated pages
More on Ping Identity
Other head to heads
- Ping Identity vs Entrust Identity as a Service
- Ping Identity vs Frontegg
- Ping Identity vs Speakeasy
- Ping Identity vs Akeyless
- Ping Identity vs authentik
- Ping Identity vs Logto
- Ping Identity vs Authelia
- Ping Identity vs Transmit Security
- Ping Identity vs Delinea
- Ping Identity vs Genetec Security Center
- Ping Identity vs VMware Carbon Black
- Ping Identity vs Rhombus Systems
- Ping Identity vs Yoti
- Ping Identity vs Avast One
- Ping Identity vs Chainguard
- Ping Identity vs Cosign
- Ping Identity vs CyberGhost VPN
- Ping Identity vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Ping Identity vs 1Password
- Ping Identity vs Norton 360
- Ping Identity vs LastPass
- Ping Identity vs Falco
- Ping Identity vs Jamf Pro
- Ping Identity vs SonicWall
- Ping Identity vs Snyk
- Ping Identity vs Bitwarden
- Ping Identity vs Brave Browser
- Ping Identity vs Infisical
- Ping Identity vs DTiQ
- Ping Identity vs ESET NOD32 Antivirus
- Ping Identity vs ExpressVPN
- Ping Identity vs Fenergo
- Ping Identity vs Google Authenticator
- WireGuard vs Entrust Identity as a Service
- WireGuard vs Frontegg
- WireGuard vs Speakeasy
- WireGuard vs Akeyless
- WireGuard vs authentik
- WireGuard vs Logto
- WireGuard vs Authelia
- WireGuard vs Transmit Security
- WireGuard vs Delinea
- WireGuard vs Genetec Security Center
- WireGuard vs VMware Carbon Black
- WireGuard vs Rhombus Systems
- WireGuard vs Yoti
- WireGuard vs Avast One
- WireGuard vs Chainguard
- WireGuard vs Cosign
- WireGuard vs CyberGhost VPN
- WireGuard vs Bitdefender Total Security
- WireGuard vs 1Password
- WireGuard vs Norton 360
- WireGuard vs LastPass
- WireGuard vs Falco
- WireGuard vs Jamf Pro
- WireGuard vs SonicWall
- WireGuard vs Snyk
- WireGuard vs Bitwarden
- WireGuard vs Brave Browser
- WireGuard vs Infisical
- WireGuard vs DTiQ
- WireGuard vs ESET NOD32 Antivirus
- WireGuard vs ExpressVPN
- WireGuard vs Fenergo
- WireGuard vs Google Authenticator
