Manufacturing · head to head
ABB 800xA vs LabVIEW

ABB 800xA
Manufacturing
Distributed control system and process automation platform for continuous and hybrid process plants
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

LabVIEW
Manufacturing
Graphical dataflow programming for automated test, measurement and instrument control
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: ABB 800xA licensing is by I/O count, controller count and workplace clients, and none of it is published, so two plants of similar size can be quoted very differently with no external benchmark to argue against.; LabVIEW nI is now part of Emerson, completing in 2023, so LabVIEW sits inside an industrial automation conglomerate rather than being the flagship of a dedicated test company; roadmap priorities and support pricing follow the parent, not the user base.
- They diverge on capability: ABB 800xA covers Extended Automation, LabVIEW covers Graphical dataflow programming.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which ABB 800xA and LabVIEW actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (quote), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Manufacturing).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in ABB 800xA
- Extended Automation
- AC 800M controllers
- Connectivity servers
- Safety integration
- IEC 61850 electrical
- Batch management
- Information management
- Asset optimisation
Only in LabVIEW
- Graphical dataflow programming
- Front panels
- Instrument driver library
- Hardware integration
- Real-time and FPGA targets
- Analysis and signal processing
- Application builder
- Nigel AI assistant
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
ABB 800xA
- A refinery replacing operator consoles and control room infrastructure while keeping working field controllers in placenot LabVIEW
- A pulp and paper mill consolidating process, electrical and safety monitoring into a single operator workplacenot LabVIEW
- A mining operation that needs SIL 3 safety functions on the same network as process control rather than a separate safety systemnot LabVIEW
- A marine or offshore platform where ABB already supplies the electrical distribution and IEC 61850 integration removes a second systemnot LabVIEW
LabVIEW
- An automotive supplier building an end-of-line test rig that must drive a power supply, read a scope and log pass/fail against a serial numbernot ABB 800xA
- A semiconductor lab characterising devices across a PXI chassis where deterministic timing between instruments mattersnot ABB 800xA
- A medical device manufacturer needing a validated, documented test system with an operator front panel a technician can run unsupervisednot ABB 800xA
- A research group prototyping a control loop on CompactRIO where part of the logic must compile down to an FPGAnot ABB 800xA
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
ABB 800xA
- Licensing is by I/O count, controller count and workplace clients, and none of it is published, so two plants of similar size can be quoted very differently with no external benchmark to argue against.
- Engineering and commissioning typically cost more than the software and controller hardware together, and that share is not visible in the initial ABB quotation, which prices the system rather than the project.
- It is Windows only for servers and workplaces, so the operating system lifecycle drives forced upgrade cycles that have nothing to do with your process.
- Once configured, the aspect object model and the specific integrator conventions used make handing the system to a different service provider expensive; ABB service contracts are effectively sticky.
- Software maintenance is an annual contract on top of the licence and lapsing it means you cannot take version upgrades, so the system quietly ages out of security support if the plant skips renewals to save money.
LabVIEW
- NI is now part of Emerson, completing in 2023, so LabVIEW sits inside an industrial automation conglomerate rather than being the flagship of a dedicated test company; roadmap priorities and support pricing follow the parent, not the user base.
- No prices appear anywhere on the NI site for commercial editions; Base, Full, Professional and the LabVIEW+ suite are all quoted through NI or a reseller, so a buyer cannot compare cost against a Python-plus-PyVISA alternative without opening a sales conversation.
- Graphical source code diffs badly. Merging two engineers’ changes to the same virtual instrument in git is impractical without NI’s own comparison tools, so team development on LabVIEW is slower and more serialised than on text-based languages.
- The pool of engineers who write LabVIEW is small and ageing relative to the pool who write Python, so hiring a replacement for the person who built your test rig is materially harder and more expensive than replacing a general software engineer.
- The environment pulls you toward NI hardware and NI add-on toolkits, and licences for real-time, FPGA and vision modules are sold separately on top of the base edition, so the quoted LabVIEW price is rarely the delivered cost of a working test system.
Pricing, plan by plan
ABB 800xA
On request- ABB Ability System 800xA$undefined/year
- Licensed by I/O count, controller count and workplace clients
- Sold as a project through ABB or a certified partner
- Annual software maintenance contract priced separately
LabVIEW
On request- LabVIEW Community EditionFree
- Free for personal, non-commercial use only
- Full LabVIEW feature set for hobbyists
- No commercial deployment rights
- LabVIEW Base$undefined/year
- Core acquisition, control and user interface capability
- Suited to simple test and measurement applications
- Available as subscription or perpetual licence
- LabVIEW Full$undefined/year
- Adds advanced analysis and signal processing
- Recommended where mathematics and filtering are required
- Available as subscription or perpetual licence
- LabVIEW Professional$undefined/year
- Adds application builder, source control and deployment tooling
- Includes the Nigel AI assistant
- Available as subscription or perpetual licence
Which should you pick?
Choose ABB 800xA if
- You need extended automation.
- You work on Windows.
- You also want ac 800m controllers.
Choose LabVIEW if
- You need graphical dataflow programming.
- You work on Windows, Linux, macOS.
- You also want front panels.
Questions people ask
- Is ABB 800xA or LabVIEW better?
- Neither clearly leads. ABB 800xA starts at On request and LabVIEW at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, ABB 800xA or LabVIEW?
- ABB 800xA starts at On request and LabVIEW at On request.
- Does ABB 800xA or LabVIEW run on more platforms?
- ABB 800xA runs on Windows. LabVIEW runs on Windows, Linux, macOS.
- What is ABB 800xA best used for?
- ABB 800xA is most often used for a refinery replacing operator consoles and control room infrastructure while keeping working field controllers in place, a pulp and paper mill consolidating process, electrical and safety monitoring into a single operator workplace, a mining operation that needs sil 3 safety functions on the same network as process control rather than a separate safety system, a marine or offshore platform where abb already supplies the electrical distribution and iec 61850 integration removes a second system. Of those, a refinery replacing operator consoles and control room infrastructure while keeping working field controllers in place and a pulp and paper mill consolidating process, electrical and safety monitoring into a single operator workplace are not what LabVIEW is typically brought in for.
- What can ABB 800xA do that LabVIEW cannot?
- ABB 800xA covers Extended Automation, AC 800M controllers, Connectivity servers, Safety integration. LabVIEW covers Graphical dataflow programming, Front panels, Instrument driver library, Hardware integration.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
ABB 800xA: Is 800xA sold as a perpetual licence?
Yes, the system licence is perpetual, but a separate annual software maintenance agreement is required to receive updates and version upgrades.
LabVIEW: Who owns LabVIEW now?
NI, formerly National Instruments, was acquired by Emerson in an acquisition that completed in 2023. LabVIEW is now an Emerson product.
ABB 800xA: Can 800xA control non-ABB field hardware?
Yes. Connectivity servers front third-party PLC and DCS systems and legacy ABB families, which is the main reason it wins brownfield projects.
LabVIEW: Can I still buy a perpetual licence?
Yes. NI offers both subscription and perpetual licences and states there are no functional or feature-level differences between them.
ABB 800xA: Does it replace a separate electrical SCADA?
It can. IEC 61850 substation integration is native, so many plants drop a separate electrical monitoring system.
LabVIEW: Is there a free version?
LabVIEW Community Edition is free for personal, non-commercial use. It carries no commercial deployment rights.
ABB 800xA: What is the realistic implementation timeline?
A full plant migration is measured in years, not months; phased cutovers of one unit at a time are the norm.
LabVIEW: How much does it cost?
NI does not publish commercial edition prices. Base, Full, Professional and LabVIEW+ are all quoted through NI or a reseller.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- ABB 800xA vs AVEVA System Platform
- ABB 800xA vs Ignition
- ABB 800xA vs Yokogawa CENTUM VP
- ABB 800xA vs GENESIS Version 11
- ABB 800xA vs Siemens WinCC Unified
- ABB 800xA vs COPA-DATA zenon
- ABB 800xA vs Rockwell FactoryTalk
- ABB 800xA vs Authentise
- ABB 800xA vs Kepware Server
- ABB 800xA vs QAD Redzone
- ABB 800xA vs Samotics
- ABB 800xA vs Sight Machine
- ABB 800xA vs Simplify3D
- ABB 800xA vs TrendMiner
- ABB 800xA vs Waites Sensor Technologies
- ABB 800xA vs Xometry
- ABB 800xA vs Erbessd Instruments
- ABB 800xA vs SolidWorks
- ABB 800xA vs SKF Enlight Centre
- ABB 800xA vs Dyndrite
- ABB 800xA vs Nanoprecise Sci Corp
- ABB 800xA vs AMFG
- ABB 800xA vs Arena PLM
- ABB 800xA vs JobBOSS²
- ABB 800xA vs Litmus Edge
- ABB 800xA vs Fusion 360
- ABB 800xA vs Paperless Parts
- ABB 800xA vs Petasense
- ABB 800xA vs Poseidon Systems
- ABB 800xA vs PROGNOST Systems
- ABB 800xA vs Propel
- ABB 800xA vs PTC Windchill
- ABB 800xA vs Prodsmart
- LabVIEW vs AVEVA System Platform
- LabVIEW vs Ignition
- LabVIEW vs Yokogawa CENTUM VP
- LabVIEW vs GENESIS Version 11
- LabVIEW vs Siemens WinCC Unified
- LabVIEW vs COPA-DATA zenon
- LabVIEW vs Rockwell FactoryTalk
- LabVIEW vs Authentise
- LabVIEW vs Kepware Server
- LabVIEW vs QAD Redzone
- LabVIEW vs Samotics
- LabVIEW vs Sight Machine
- LabVIEW vs Simplify3D
- LabVIEW vs TrendMiner
- LabVIEW vs Waites Sensor Technologies
- LabVIEW vs Xometry
- LabVIEW vs Erbessd Instruments
- LabVIEW vs SolidWorks
- LabVIEW vs SKF Enlight Centre
- LabVIEW vs Dyndrite
- LabVIEW vs Nanoprecise Sci Corp
- LabVIEW vs AMFG
- LabVIEW vs Arena PLM
- LabVIEW vs JobBOSS²
- LabVIEW vs Litmus Edge
- LabVIEW vs Fusion 360
- LabVIEW vs Paperless Parts
- LabVIEW vs Petasense
- LabVIEW vs Poseidon Systems
- LabVIEW vs PROGNOST Systems
- LabVIEW vs Propel
- LabVIEW vs PTC Windchill
- LabVIEW vs Prodsmart
