Manufacturing · head to head
ABB 800xA vs Poseidon Systems

ABB 800xA
Manufacturing
Distributed control system and process automation platform for continuous and hybrid process plants
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Poseidon Systems
Manufacturing
Oil debris and fluid quality monitoring for gearboxes and drivetrains, not vibration
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: ABB 800xA licensing is by I/O count, controller count and workplace clients, and none of it is published, so two plants of similar size can be quoted very differently with no external benchmark to argue against.; Poseidon Systems sensors must be plumbed into the lubrication circuit, so installation needs a shutdown, a mechanical fitter and pressure-rated connections, which puts the retrofit cost well above a magnetically mounted vibration sensor.
- They diverge on capability: ABB 800xA covers Extended Automation, Poseidon Systems covers Metallic wear debris detection.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which ABB 800xA and Poseidon Systems actually diverge.
| Attribute | ABB 800xA | Poseidon Systems |
|---|---|---|
| Platforms | Windows | Web, Cloud, On-premise |
Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (quote), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Manufacturing).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in ABB 800xA
- Extended Automation
- AC 800M controllers
- Connectivity servers
- Safety integration
- IEC 61850 electrical
- Batch management
- Information management
- Asset optimisation
Only in Poseidon Systems
- Metallic wear debris detection
- Fluid quality sensing
- Trident FQMS
- Inline installation
- Remote data access
- Defence drivetrain heritage
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
ABB 800xA
- A refinery replacing operator consoles and control room infrastructure while keeping working field controllers in placenot Poseidon Systems
- A pulp and paper mill consolidating process, electrical and safety monitoring into a single operator workplacenot Poseidon Systems
- A mining operation that needs SIL 3 safety functions on the same network as process control rather than a separate safety systemnot Poseidon Systems
- A marine or offshore platform where ABB already supplies the electrical distribution and IEC 61850 integration removes a second systemnot Poseidon Systems
Poseidon Systems
- A wind farm operator monitoring gearbox wear debris, where a gearbox replacement offshore costs far more than instrumenting the whole fleetnot ABB 800xA
- A marine operator watching propulsion reduction gear for water ingress and metallic wear between dry dockingsnot ABB 800xA
- A mining company monitoring slow-speed mill and conveyor drive gearboxes where vibration analysis gives late warningnot ABB 800xA
- A defence operator needing drivetrain prognostics with a supplier that has aerospace transmission monitoring provenancenot ABB 800xA
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
ABB 800xA
- Licensing is by I/O count, controller count and workplace clients, and none of it is published, so two plants of similar size can be quoted very differently with no external benchmark to argue against.
- Engineering and commissioning typically cost more than the software and controller hardware together, and that share is not visible in the initial ABB quotation, which prices the system rather than the project.
- It is Windows only for servers and workplaces, so the operating system lifecycle drives forced upgrade cycles that have nothing to do with your process.
- Once configured, the aspect object model and the specific integrator conventions used make handing the system to a different service provider expensive; ABB service contracts are effectively sticky.
- Software maintenance is an annual contract on top of the licence and lapsing it means you cannot take version upgrades, so the system quietly ages out of security support if the plant skips renewals to save money.
Poseidon Systems
- Sensors must be plumbed into the lubrication circuit, so installation needs a shutdown, a mechanical fitter and pressure-rated connections, which puts the retrofit cost well above a magnetically mounted vibration sensor.
- It monitors the lubricant, so it says nothing about unlubricated failure modes, structural problems, electrical faults or process conditions, and it is a complement to vibration monitoring rather than a replacement for it.
- Poseidon Systems is a small specialist manufacturer, so a fleet-wide standardisation decision carries real supplier continuity risk and there is no second source for the same sensors.
- The software layer is thin compared with dedicated reliability platforms, so most buyers end up feeding the data into a SCADA or historian they already run rather than using Poseidon as their monitoring interface.
- No pricing is published for sensors, concentrators or software, and per-drivetrain costs are high enough that the business case only works on gearboxes whose failure is genuinely expensive.
Pricing, plan by plan
ABB 800xA
On request- ABB Ability System 800xA$undefined/year
- Licensed by I/O count, controller count and workplace clients
- Sold as a project through ABB or a certified partner
- Annual software maintenance contract priced separately
Poseidon Systems
On request- Trident condition monitoring$undefined/year
- Priced per sensor and per monitored drivetrain
- Mechanical installation into the lubrication circuit required
- Data concentrator hardware required for multi-sensor systems
Which should you pick?
Choose ABB 800xA if
- You need extended automation.
- You work on Windows.
- You also want ac 800m controllers.
Choose Poseidon Systems if
- You need metallic wear debris detection.
- You work on Web, Cloud, On-premise.
- You also want fluid quality sensing.
Questions people ask
- Is ABB 800xA or Poseidon Systems better?
- Neither clearly leads. ABB 800xA starts at On request and Poseidon Systems at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, ABB 800xA or Poseidon Systems?
- ABB 800xA starts at On request and Poseidon Systems at On request.
- Does ABB 800xA or Poseidon Systems run on more platforms?
- ABB 800xA runs on Windows. Poseidon Systems runs on Web, Cloud, On-premise.
- What is ABB 800xA best used for?
- ABB 800xA is most often used for a refinery replacing operator consoles and control room infrastructure while keeping working field controllers in place, a pulp and paper mill consolidating process, electrical and safety monitoring into a single operator workplace, a mining operation that needs sil 3 safety functions on the same network as process control rather than a separate safety system, a marine or offshore platform where abb already supplies the electrical distribution and iec 61850 integration removes a second system. Of those, a refinery replacing operator consoles and control room infrastructure while keeping working field controllers in place and a pulp and paper mill consolidating process, electrical and safety monitoring into a single operator workplace are not what Poseidon Systems is typically brought in for.
- What can ABB 800xA do that Poseidon Systems cannot?
- ABB 800xA covers Extended Automation, AC 800M controllers, Connectivity servers, Safety integration. Poseidon Systems covers Metallic wear debris detection, Fluid quality sensing, Trident FQMS, Inline installation.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
ABB 800xA: Is 800xA sold as a perpetual licence?
Yes, the system licence is perpetual, but a separate annual software maintenance agreement is required to receive updates and version upgrades.
Poseidon Systems: Does this replace vibration monitoring?
No. Oil debris monitoring catches gear and bearing wear earlier in slow-speed and heavily loaded drives, but it sees nothing outside the lubrication circuit. Most operators run both.
ABB 800xA: Can 800xA control non-ABB field hardware?
Yes. Connectivity servers front third-party PLC and DCS systems and legacy ABB families, which is the main reason it wins brownfield projects.
Poseidon Systems: How are the sensors installed?
Inline in the lubrication circuit, which requires a mechanical installation and a shutdown, unlike an externally mounted vibration sensor.
ABB 800xA: Does it replace a separate electrical SCADA?
It can. IEC 61850 substation integration is native, so many plants drop a separate electrical monitoring system.
Poseidon Systems: Is there a software-only option?
No. The software comes with the hardware; there is no route to buy the analytics and use another vendor's sensors.
ABB 800xA: What is the realistic implementation timeline?
A full plant migration is measured in years, not months; phased cutovers of one unit at a time are the norm.
Poseidon Systems: Is Poseidon Systems still independent?
Yes. It trades under its own name from Rochester, New York, with roots in the Impact Technologies prognostics business.
Related pages
More on Poseidon Systems
Other head to heads
- ABB 800xA vs AVEVA System Platform
- ABB 800xA vs Ignition
- ABB 800xA vs Yokogawa CENTUM VP
- ABB 800xA vs GENESIS Version 11
- ABB 800xA vs Siemens WinCC Unified
- ABB 800xA vs COPA-DATA zenon
- ABB 800xA vs Rockwell FactoryTalk
- ABB 800xA vs Authentise
- ABB 800xA vs Kepware Server
- ABB 800xA vs QAD Redzone
- ABB 800xA vs Samotics
- ABB 800xA vs Sight Machine
- ABB 800xA vs Simplify3D
- ABB 800xA vs TrendMiner
- ABB 800xA vs Waites Sensor Technologies
- ABB 800xA vs Xometry
- ABB 800xA vs Nanoprecise Sci Corp
- ABB 800xA vs KCF Technologies
- ABB 800xA vs Sensemore
- ABB 800xA vs Augury
- ABB 800xA vs SKF Enlight Centre
- ABB 800xA vs Petasense
- ABB 800xA vs MOVUS
- ABB 800xA vs Erbessd Instruments
- ABB 800xA vs PROGNOST Systems
- ABB 800xA vs eMaint
- ABB 800xA vs Oqton
- ABB 800xA vs Paperless Parts
- ABB 800xA vs Prodsmart
- ABB 800xA vs Propel
- Poseidon Systems vs AVEVA System Platform
- Poseidon Systems vs Ignition
- Poseidon Systems vs Yokogawa CENTUM VP
- Poseidon Systems vs GENESIS Version 11
- Poseidon Systems vs Siemens WinCC Unified
- Poseidon Systems vs COPA-DATA zenon
- Poseidon Systems vs Rockwell FactoryTalk
- Poseidon Systems vs Authentise
- Poseidon Systems vs Kepware Server
- Poseidon Systems vs QAD Redzone
- Poseidon Systems vs Samotics
- Poseidon Systems vs Sight Machine
- Poseidon Systems vs Simplify3D
- Poseidon Systems vs TrendMiner
- Poseidon Systems vs Waites Sensor Technologies
- Poseidon Systems vs Xometry
- Poseidon Systems vs Nanoprecise Sci Corp
- Poseidon Systems vs KCF Technologies
- Poseidon Systems vs Sensemore
- Poseidon Systems vs Augury
- Poseidon Systems vs SKF Enlight Centre
- Poseidon Systems vs Petasense
- Poseidon Systems vs MOVUS
- Poseidon Systems vs Erbessd Instruments
- Poseidon Systems vs PROGNOST Systems
- Poseidon Systems vs eMaint
- Poseidon Systems vs Oqton
- Poseidon Systems vs Paperless Parts
- Poseidon Systems vs Prodsmart
- Poseidon Systems vs Propel
