APIs · head to head
Kong vs VMware Carbon Black
VMware Carbon Black
Cybersecurity
Cloud-delivered endpoint protection and EDR, now owned by Broadcom and positioned alongside Symantec.
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Kong has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Kong the Plus plan includes 1M API requests a month and charges $200 a month for each additional million; VMware Carbon Black broadcom's enterprise model concentrates direct sales and support on its largest accounts and moves everyone else to resellers, so a mid-size customer can lose named support contacts and face a substantially repriced renewal with limited notice.
- They diverge on capability: Kong covers API Gateway, VMware Carbon Black covers Endpoint Standard.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Kong and VMware Carbon Black actually diverge.
| Attribute | Kong | VMware Carbon Black |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | On request |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Platforms | Linux, Docker, Kubernetes | Desktop, Api |
| Category | APIs | Cybersecurity |
| Founded | 2010 | 2002 |
Identical on both: pricing model (subscription), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Kong
- API Gateway
- Authentication & Authorization
- Rate Limiting
- Kubernetes
- Consul
- Eureka
- PostgreSQL
- Linux support
Only in VMware Carbon Black
- Endpoint Standard
- Enterprise EDR
- Audit and Remediation
- Single sensor
- Live Response
- Workload protection
- Container security
- Watchlists and feeds
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Kong
- API gateway management and routingnot VMware Carbon Black
- API development and testingnot VMware Carbon Black
- Enterprise API security and governancenot VMware Carbon Black
VMware Carbon Black
- A SOC that wants unfiltered endpoint telemetry to hunt over rather than only vendor-generated alertsnot Kong
- A vSphere estate that wants workload protection deployed through the hypervisor instead of installing an agent in every guestnot Kong
- Replacing signature antivirus after an incident where the incumbent product had no record of what the attacker didnot Kong
- An organisation already inside a Broadcom or Symantec enterprise agreement that can consolidate endpoint onto an existing contractnot Kong
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Kong
- The Plus plan includes 1M API requests a month and charges $200 a month for each additional million
- Plus is capped at 10M requests a month, so growth past that forces an Enterprise contract
- Plus limits published APIs to 20 and includes one Developer Portal, with a second at $200 a month
- SSO and audit logging are Enterprise only
- Enterprise pricing is custom and billed annually
VMware Carbon Black
- Broadcom's enterprise model concentrates direct sales and support on its largest accounts and moves everyone else to resellers, so a mid-size customer can lose named support contacts and face a substantially repriced renewal with limited notice.
- Continuous EDR recording is retained for a defined window and longer retention is a paid tier, so the investigation you most need is often the one whose telemetry has already aged out, and that is discovered during the incident rather than before it.
- The product assumes an operator: watchlists, policy tuning and alert triage are ongoing work, and organisations without a dedicated analyst or an MDR contract typically leave policies in monitor mode and pay for telemetry that is never reviewed.
- The sensor operates in the same kernel and file-filter territory as other endpoint agents, so running it alongside an incumbent antivirus, DLP or backup agent commonly produces performance complaints and requires maintained exclusion lists on both sides.
- Linux sensor support is tied to specific distribution and kernel versions, so a routine operating system upgrade can leave hosts without a supported sensor until a matching build ships, and anything outside the supported list gets no coverage at all.
Pricing, plan by plan
Kong
Free- Kong Konnect Free TrialFree
- 30-day free trial
- Full enterprise functionality
- Unlimited gateways
- Kong Konnect Plus$null/month
- Per gateway pricing billed monthly
- Up to 5 Serverless Gateways, 2 Hybrid, 2 Dedicated Cloud Gateways
- 1M API requests included per month
- Kong Insomnia EssentialsFree
- Unlimited projects and CLI access
- Up to 3 Git Sync users
- 1,000 mock server requests per month
- Kong Insomnia Pro$12/month
- Unlimited users with Git Sync access
- Unlimited organizations
- RBAC
VMware Carbon Black
On request- CB Endpoint StandardFree
- NGAV
- Behavioral EDR
- Device control
- CB Endpoint AdvancedFree
- All Standard features
- Threat hunting
- Audit and remediation
- CB Endpoint EnterpriseFree
- All Advanced features
- Advanced threat hunting
- Live response
Which should you pick?
Choose Kong if
- You need api gateway.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes.
- You also want authentication & authorization.
Choose VMware Carbon Black if
- You need endpoint standard.
- You work on Desktop, Api.
- You also want enterprise edr.
Questions people ask
- Is Kong or VMware Carbon Black better?
- Neither clearly leads. Kong starts at Free and VMware Carbon Black at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Kong or VMware Carbon Black?
- Kong has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Kong and On request for VMware Carbon Black.
- Does Kong or VMware Carbon Black run on more platforms?
- Kong runs on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes. VMware Carbon Black runs on Desktop, Api.
- Can I use Kong for free?
- Yes. Kong has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. VMware Carbon Black starts at On request.
- What is Kong best used for?
- Kong is most often used for api gateway management and routing, api development and testing, enterprise api security and governance. Of those, api gateway management and routing and api development and testing are not what VMware Carbon Black is typically brought in for.
- What can Kong do that VMware Carbon Black cannot?
- Kong covers API Gateway, Authentication & Authorization, Rate Limiting, Kubernetes. VMware Carbon Black covers Endpoint Standard, Enterprise EDR, Audit and Remediation, Single sensor.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Kong: Does Kong offer a free trial?
Yes, Kong Konnect offers a 30-day free trial with full enterprise functionality, unlimited gateways, and no credit card required.
SourceVMware Carbon Black: Who owns Carbon Black now?
Broadcom. It acquired VMware in November 2023, and Carbon Black now sits in Broadcom's enterprise security business alongside Symantec. VMware branding is being phased out.
Kong: How much does Kong Insomnia Pro cost?
Kong Insomnia Pro is $12 per user per month with 15% savings available for annual billing.
SourceVMware Carbon Black: Why do the docs use names I do not recognise?
The product has been renamed repeatedly. CB Defense is now Endpoint Standard, CB ThreatHunter is Enterprise EDR and CB LiveOps is Audit and Remediation. Older community answers and runbooks still use the previous names.
Kong: What are Kong Konnect Plus API request limits?
Kong Konnect Plus includes 1M API requests per month; additional requests cost $200 per 1M (maximum 10M per month).
SourceVMware Carbon Black: Does it replace my existing antivirus?
Yes on supported Windows, macOS and Linux versions, and running it alongside another antivirus is not recommended because the two agents contend for the same hooks. Check your compliance requirements, as some auditors still ask for a named antivirus product.
Kong: What is included in Kong Insomnia Enterprise?
Kong Insomnia Enterprise is $45 per user per month with SSO, SCIM, vault integrations, unlimited mock server requests, and Konnect integration.
SourceVMware Carbon Black: Do I need a full-time analyst to run it?
To get value from Enterprise EDR, effectively yes. The prevention tier can run with part-time attention, but the hunting and recording capability is only worth its cost if somebody is querying it, which is why many customers buy it through an MDR provider.
VMware Carbon Black: How is it licensed?
Per endpoint, per year, with the capability tier determining the rate and workload and container protection priced separately. Extended EDR data retention is an additional line item.
Related pages
More on VMware Carbon Black
Other head to heads
- Kong vs Convoy
- Kong vs PocketBase
- Kong vs Appwrite
- Kong vs Hasura
- Kong vs Sanity
- Kong vs Tyk
- Kong vs WSO2 API Manager
- Kong vs Gravitee
- Kong vs Janus Gateway
- Kong vs Spring Cloud Gateway
- Kong vs 3scale
- Kong vs Akana
- Kong vs Enable Banking
- Kong vs Flybits
- Kong vs i2c
- Kong vs KeystoneJS
- Kong vs Liveblocks
- Kong vs Moesif
- Kong vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Kong vs Norton 360
- Kong vs 1Password
- Kong vs LastPass
- Kong vs Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
- Kong vs Cybereason Defense Platform
- Kong vs CrowdStrike Falcon
- Kong vs SentinelOne
- Kong vs Trend Micro Vision One
- Kong vs Proofpoint
- Kong vs Sophos Intercept X
- Kong vs Descope
- Kong vs Drata
- Kong vs DTiQ
- Kong vs ESET NOD32 Antivirus
- Kong vs ExpressVPN
- Kong vs Falco
- Kong vs SentinelOne Singularity
- VMware Carbon Black vs Convoy
- VMware Carbon Black vs PocketBase
- VMware Carbon Black vs Appwrite
- VMware Carbon Black vs Hasura
- VMware Carbon Black vs Sanity
- VMware Carbon Black vs Tyk
- VMware Carbon Black vs WSO2 API Manager
- VMware Carbon Black vs Gravitee
- VMware Carbon Black vs Janus Gateway
- VMware Carbon Black vs Spring Cloud Gateway
- VMware Carbon Black vs 3scale
- VMware Carbon Black vs Akana
- VMware Carbon Black vs Enable Banking
- VMware Carbon Black vs Flybits
- VMware Carbon Black vs i2c
- VMware Carbon Black vs KeystoneJS
- VMware Carbon Black vs Liveblocks
- VMware Carbon Black vs Moesif
- VMware Carbon Black vs Bitdefender Total Security
- VMware Carbon Black vs Norton 360
- VMware Carbon Black vs 1Password
- VMware Carbon Black vs LastPass
- VMware Carbon Black vs Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
- VMware Carbon Black vs Cybereason Defense Platform
- VMware Carbon Black vs CrowdStrike Falcon
- VMware Carbon Black vs SentinelOne
- VMware Carbon Black vs Trend Micro Vision One
- VMware Carbon Black vs Proofpoint
- VMware Carbon Black vs Sophos Intercept X
- VMware Carbon Black vs Descope
- VMware Carbon Black vs Drata
- VMware Carbon Black vs DTiQ
- VMware Carbon Black vs ESET NOD32 Antivirus
- VMware Carbon Black vs ExpressVPN
- VMware Carbon Black vs Falco
- VMware Carbon Black vs SentinelOne Singularity

