APIs · head to head
MX Technologies vs Sanity

MX Technologies
APIs
US financial data aggregation with heavy transaction cleansing and enrichment
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Sanity
APIs
Headless CMS with real-time collaborative editing and structured content APIs
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Sanity has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: MX Technologies coverage is United States focused, so any product with European or other international users runs a second aggregator and reconciles two data models, which removes most of the single vendor argument.; Sanity free plan limited to 10,000 documents and 100GB assets
- They diverge on capability: MX Technologies covers Account aggregation, Sanity covers Content API.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which MX Technologies and Sanity actually diverge.
| Attribute | MX Technologies | Sanity |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | On request | Free |
| Pricing model | quote | freemium |
| Free tier | No | Yes |
| Platforms | API, Web | Web |
| Founded | Unknown | 2011 |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (APIs).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in MX Technologies
- Account aggregation
- Transaction cleansing
- Categorisation
- Merchant resolution
- Account verification
- Balance and funds checks
- Data enhancement APIs
- Consent and connection management
Only in Sanity
- Content API
- Collaborative editing
- Structured content
- Webhooks
- Third-party services
- GROQ query language
- Cloud support
- JavaScript SDK support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
MX Technologies
- A credit union building a personal finance view in its own app that needs its own transaction descriptions made readablenot Sanity
- A lender using cash flow underwriting that needs categorised income and expense data rather than raw transaction stringsnot Sanity
- A bank wanting account verification and balance checks before initiating ACH debits to reduce returnsnot Sanity
- A fintech that already aggregates data elsewhere and licenses only the enrichment layer to clean what it hasnot Sanity
Sanity
- Headless CMS for structured content managementnot MX Technologies
- Collaborative content editing with real-time multiplayer supportnot MX Technologies
- API-driven content delivery with GROQ query languagenot MX Technologies
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
MX Technologies
- Coverage is United States focused, so any product with European or other international users runs a second aggregator and reconciles two data models, which removes most of the single vendor argument.
- Nothing is published on price and contracts are enterprise shaped, so a small fintech cannot estimate cost or start building without a sales process, unlike self-serve competitors.
- Data enhancement is the differentiator and is licensed separately from aggregation, so the quoted aggregation price is not the price of the product people actually buy it for.
- Categorisation and merchant resolution are statistical and get business to business and unusual transactions wrong more often than consumer retail, so lending decisions built on categorised data need their own review layer.
- As the United States moves to regulated API access, connection quality depends on what each institution exposes, and the long tail of small banks and credit unions remains the weakest part of any aggregator including this one.
Sanity
- Free plan limited to 10,000 documents and 100GB assets
- Free plan supports only public datasets
- Growth plan capped at 50 seats maximum
- Private datasets, scheduled drafts, and comments/tasks require paid plans
- Annual billing unavailable for Growth plan; Enterprise-only
Pricing, plan by plan
MX Technologies
On request- MX Platform$undefined/year
- Priced by connected users, API calls and modules
- Data enhancement licensed separately from aggregation
- Enterprise contracts aimed at financial institutions
Sanity
Free- FreeFree
- Up to 20 seats
- 2 public datasets only
- 10,000 documents included
- Growth$15/month
- Up to 50 seats per seat
- 2 private or public datasets
- 25,000 documents included
- Enterprise$null/month
- Custom seats
- Custom datasets
- Custom document limits
Which should you pick?
Choose MX Technologies if
- You need account aggregation.
- You work on API, Web.
- You also want transaction cleansing.
Choose Sanity if
- You need content api.
- You want to start without paying.
- You also want collaborative editing.
Questions people ask
- Is MX Technologies or Sanity better?
- Neither clearly leads. MX Technologies starts at On request and Sanity at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, MX Technologies or Sanity?
- Sanity has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at On request for MX Technologies and Free for Sanity.
- Does MX Technologies or Sanity run on more platforms?
- MX Technologies runs on API, Web. Sanity runs on Web.
- Can I use Sanity for free?
- Yes. Sanity has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. MX Technologies starts at On request.
- What is MX Technologies best used for?
- MX Technologies is most often used for a credit union building a personal finance view in its own app that needs its own transaction descriptions made readable, a lender using cash flow underwriting that needs categorised income and expense data rather than raw transaction strings, a bank wanting account verification and balance checks before initiating ach debits to reduce returns, a fintech that already aggregates data elsewhere and licenses only the enrichment layer to clean what it has. Of those, a credit union building a personal finance view in its own app that needs its own transaction descriptions made readable and a lender using cash flow underwriting that needs categorised income and expense data rather than raw transaction strings are not what Sanity is typically brought in for.
- What can MX Technologies do that Sanity cannot?
- MX Technologies covers Account aggregation, Transaction cleansing, Categorisation, Merchant resolution. Sanity covers Content API, Collaborative editing, Structured content, Webhooks.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
MX Technologies: What does MX do that Plaid does not?
It sells transaction cleansing, categorisation and merchant resolution as a first class product, including on data you already hold, which is why financial institutions rather than startups are its core customers.
Sanity: What does the Sanity Free plan include?
The Free plan includes up to 20 seats, 2 public datasets, 10,000 documents, 1 million API CDN requests per month, and 2 permission roles.
SourceMX Technologies: Does it cover Europe?
No. MX is United States focused. European coverage requires a different provider such as Tink.
Sanity: How much does Sanity Growth plan cost per user?
The Growth plan costs $15 per seat per month, with up to 50 seats, and includes 25,000 documents, 1 million API CDN requests, and 5 permission roles.
SourceMX Technologies: Is pricing published?
No. Contracts are quoted by connected users, call volume and modules, with enhancement licensed separately from aggregation.
Sanity: What is included in Sanity Enterprise pricing?
Enterprise pricing is custom and requires contacting sales. It includes custom seat limits, custom datasets, Single Sign-On, and dedicated support.
SourceMX Technologies: Does it use screen scraping?
It uses direct bank APIs where institutions expose them and credential based connections elsewhere. The credential path is being deprecated across the industry, and coverage quality now tracks which banks have real APIs.
Sanity: Does Sanity offer annual billing discounts?
Annual and invoice payment options are available exclusively for Enterprise customers. Self-serve plans (Free and Growth) use monthly billing only.
SourceRelated pages
More on MX Technologies
Other head to heads
- MX Technologies vs Yodlee
- MX Technologies vs Tink
- MX Technologies vs Bud Financial
- MX Technologies vs Akoya
- MX Technologies vs Ozone API
- MX Technologies vs Yapily
- MX Technologies vs Enable Banking
- MX Technologies vs Method Financial
- MX Technologies vs TrueLayer
- MX Technologies vs Token.io
- MX Technologies vs Brite Payments
- MX Technologies vs Volt
- MX Technologies vs Temenos Transact
- MX Technologies vs Treasury Prime
- MX Technologies vs 10x Banking
- MX Technologies vs Payload CMS
- MX Technologies vs KeystoneJS
- MX Technologies vs Strapi
- MX Technologies vs GraphQL Apollo
- MX Technologies vs Prisma
- MX Technologies vs Sensedia
- MX Technologies vs Hasura
- MX Technologies vs PocketBase
- MX Technologies vs Directus
- MX Technologies vs Paw
- MX Technologies vs Tyk
- MX Technologies vs Janus Gateway
- MX Technologies vs Kong Gateway
- MX Technologies vs Marqeta
- MX Technologies vs Meniga
- MX Technologies vs Moov
- MX Technologies vs PubNub
- Sanity vs Yodlee
- Sanity vs Tink
- Sanity vs Bud Financial
- Sanity vs Akoya
- Sanity vs Ozone API
- Sanity vs Yapily
- Sanity vs Enable Banking
- Sanity vs Method Financial
- Sanity vs TrueLayer
- Sanity vs Token.io
- Sanity vs Brite Payments
- Sanity vs Volt
- Sanity vs Temenos Transact
- Sanity vs Treasury Prime
- Sanity vs 10x Banking
- Sanity vs Payload CMS
- Sanity vs KeystoneJS
- Sanity vs Strapi
- Sanity vs GraphQL Apollo
- Sanity vs Prisma
- Sanity vs Sensedia
- Sanity vs Hasura
- Sanity vs PocketBase
- Sanity vs Directus
- Sanity vs Paw
- Sanity vs Tyk
- Sanity vs Janus Gateway
- Sanity vs Kong Gateway
- Sanity vs Marqeta
- Sanity vs Meniga
- Sanity vs Moov
- Sanity vs PubNub
