APIs · head to head
Kong vs Refact

Refact
Developer Tools
Autonomous AI coding agent for development tasks
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Kong the Plus plan includes 1M API requests a month and charges $200 a month for each additional million; Refact requires configuration for optimal performance
- They diverge on capability: Kong covers API Gateway, Refact covers Autonomous agent workflows.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Kong and Refact actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Kong
- API Gateway
- Authentication & Authorization
- Rate Limiting
- Kubernetes
- Consul
- Eureka
- PostgreSQL
- Linux support
Only in Refact
- Autonomous agent workflows
- IDE chat
- Real-time code completions
- GitHub integration
- Database integration
- On-premise deployment
- Multi-LLM support
- 25+ language support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Kong
- API gateway management and routingnot Refact
- API development and testingnot Refact
- Enterprise API security and governancenot Refact
Refact
- Autonomous code generation for development tasksnot Kong
- End-to-end bug fixes and refactoringnot Kong
- Multi-language software development accelerationnot Kong
- Enterprise development with data privacy requirementsnot Kong
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Kong
- The Plus plan includes 1M API requests a month and charges $200 a month for each additional million
- Plus is capped at 10M requests a month, so growth past that forces an Enterprise contract
- Plus limits published APIs to 20 and includes one Developer Portal, with a second at $200 a month
- SSO and audit logging are Enterprise only
- Enterprise pricing is custom and billed annually
Refact
- Requires configuration for optimal performance
- On-premise deployment adds operational complexity
- Free tier limited by daily agent request quota
- Coin system adds complexity to cost calculation
Pricing, plan by plan
Kong
Free- Kong Konnect Free TrialFree
- 30-day free trial
- Full enterprise functionality
- Unlimited gateways
- Kong Konnect Plus$null/month
- Per gateway pricing billed monthly
- Up to 5 Serverless Gateways, 2 Hybrid, 2 Dedicated Cloud Gateways
- 1M API requests included per month
- Kong Insomnia EssentialsFree
- Unlimited projects and CLI access
- Up to 3 Git Sync users
- 1,000 mock server requests per month
- Kong Insomnia Pro$12/month
- Unlimited users with Git Sync access
- Unlimited organizations
- RBAC
Refact
Free- FreeFree
- Limited daily agent usage
- Unlimited completions
- 2,000 coins for agent and chat
- Pro$10/month
- 40 daily agent requests
- 64k context window
- 10,000 coins monthly
- Enterprise$undefined/custom
- On-premise deployment
- Custom coin allocation
- Fine-tuning support
Which should you pick?
Choose Kong if
- You need api gateway.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes.
- You also want authentication & authorization.
Choose Refact if
- You need autonomous agent workflows.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on VS Code, Web.
- You also want ide chat.
Questions people ask
- Is Kong or Refact better?
- Neither clearly leads. Kong starts at Free and Refact at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Kong or Refact?
- Kong starts at Free and Refact at Free.
- Does Kong or Refact run on more platforms?
- Kong runs on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes. Refact runs on VS Code, Web.
- Can I use Kong for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Kong best used for?
- Kong is most often used for api gateway management and routing, api development and testing, enterprise api security and governance. Of those, api gateway management and routing and api development and testing are not what Refact is typically brought in for.
- What can Kong do that Refact cannot?
- Kong covers API Gateway, Authentication & Authorization, Rate Limiting, Kubernetes. Refact covers Autonomous agent workflows, IDE chat, Real-time code completions, GitHub integration.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Kong: Does Kong offer a free trial?
Yes, Kong Konnect offers a 30-day free trial with full enterprise functionality, unlimited gateways, and no credit card required.
SourceRefact: How many programming languages does Refact support?
Refact supports 25+ programming languages including Python, JavaScript, Go, Rust, Java, C++, and many others.
SourceKong: How much does Kong Insomnia Pro cost?
Kong Insomnia Pro is $12 per user per month with 15% savings available for annual billing.
SourceRefact: Can I deploy Refact on-premises?
Yes. Refact offers on-premise deployment options for organizations requiring complete data control and privacy.
SourceKong: What are Kong Konnect Plus API request limits?
Kong Konnect Plus includes 1M API requests per month; additional requests cost $200 per 1M (maximum 10M per month).
SourceRefact: What LLMs does Refact support?
Refact works with multiple LLMs including Claude, GPT-4, and open-source models, giving you flexibility in model selection.
SourceKong: What is included in Kong Insomnia Enterprise?
Kong Insomnia Enterprise is $45 per user per month with SSO, SCIM, vault integrations, unlimited mock server requests, and Konnect integration.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Kong vs Convoy
- Kong vs PocketBase
- Kong vs Appwrite
- Kong vs Hasura
- Kong vs Sanity
- Kong vs Tyk
- Kong vs WSO2 API Manager
- Kong vs Gravitee
- Kong vs Janus Gateway
- Kong vs Spring Cloud Gateway
- Kong vs 3scale
- Kong vs Akana
- Kong vs Enable Banking
- Kong vs Flybits
- Kong vs i2c
- Kong vs KeystoneJS
- Kong vs Liveblocks
- Kong vs Moesif
- Kong vs GitHub Copilot
- Kong vs Swagger UI
- Kong vs Sweep
- Kong vs Coder
- Kong vs Pieces for Developers
- Kong vs CodeSandbox
- Kong vs GNU Emacs
- Kong vs Moonrepo
- Kong vs Pants Build
- Kong vs Atlantis
- Kong vs Backstage
- Kong vs Visual Studio Code
- Kong vs Garden
- Kong vs GitLab CI/CD
- Kong vs HCP Terraform
- Kong vs Helm
- Kong vs Jitsu
- Kong vs Notepad++
- Refact vs Convoy
- Refact vs PocketBase
- Refact vs Appwrite
- Refact vs Hasura
- Refact vs Sanity
- Refact vs Tyk
- Refact vs WSO2 API Manager
- Refact vs Gravitee
- Refact vs Janus Gateway
- Refact vs Spring Cloud Gateway
- Refact vs 3scale
- Refact vs Akana
- Refact vs Enable Banking
- Refact vs Flybits
- Refact vs i2c
- Refact vs KeystoneJS
- Refact vs Liveblocks
- Refact vs Moesif
- Refact vs GitHub Copilot
- Refact vs Swagger UI
- Refact vs Sweep
- Refact vs Coder
- Refact vs Pieces for Developers
- Refact vs CodeSandbox
- Refact vs GNU Emacs
- Refact vs Moonrepo
- Refact vs Pants Build
- Refact vs Atlantis
- Refact vs Backstage
- Refact vs Visual Studio Code
- Refact vs Garden
- Refact vs GitLab CI/CD
- Refact vs HCP Terraform
- Refact vs Helm
- Refact vs Jitsu
- Refact vs Notepad++

