Developer Tools · head to head
Jitsu vs Kong

Jitsu
Developer Tools
Open source event pipeline that streams behavioural data to your own warehouse
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Jitsu jitsu is a pipeline, not a customer data platform, so identity resolution, audience building and reverse ETL are absent and a marketing team expecting Segment parity will be disappointed.; Kong the Plus plan includes 1M API requests a month and charges $200 a month for each additional million
- They diverge on capability: Jitsu covers Event collection, Kong covers API Gateway.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Jitsu and Kong actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Jitsu
- Event collection
- Warehouse destinations
- Connector syncs
- Transformations
- Bundled ClickHouse
- Event debugger
- Self-hosting
- Custom domains
Only in Kong
- API Gateway
- Authentication & Authorization
- Rate Limiting
- Kubernetes
- Consul
- Eureka
- PostgreSQL
- Linux support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Jitsu
- A team paying five figures a year to a customer data platform when all it actually does is send events to Snowflakenot Kong
- An engineering group that needs event collection running inside its own VPC for data residency or security review reasonsnot Kong
- A product analytics setup that wants raw events in the warehouse as the source of truth rather than trapped in a vendor toolnot Kong
- A startup that needs first-party event collection on its own domain to reduce loss from tracker blocking without paying CDP pricesnot Kong
Kong
- API gateway management and routingnot Jitsu
- API development and testingnot Jitsu
- Enterprise API security and governancenot Jitsu
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Jitsu
- Jitsu is a pipeline, not a customer data platform, so identity resolution, audience building and reverse ETL are absent and a marketing team expecting Segment parity will be disappointed.
- Connector sync frequency is deliberately tiered, with the free plan limited to manual runs and one daily sync, so anything approaching operational freshness requires the paid plan or self-hosting.
- Self-hosting means you own the reliability of a system that drops data silently when misconfigured, and event loss is uniquely hard to notice because nothing errors, the numbers are just quietly lower.
- The connector catalogue is far smaller than Fivetran or Airbyte, so if your requirement is pulling from many SaaS sources rather than pushing events, Jitsu is the wrong half of the problem.
- It is a small company with a small commercial team, so enterprise procurement processes around security review, contractual SLAs and support escalation take longer than with an incumbent vendor.
Kong
- The Plus plan includes 1M API requests a month and charges $200 a month for each additional million
- Plus is capped at 10M requests a month, so growth past that forces an Enterprise contract
- Plus limits published APIs to 20 and includes one Developer Portal, with a second at $200 a month
- SSO and audit logging are Enterprise only
- Enterprise pricing is custom and billed annually
Pricing, plan by plan
Jitsu
Free- Open SourceFree
- MIT licence
- Self-host on any cloud
- No usage limits
- Cloud FreeFree
- Unlimited captured events
- 200,000 active events per month
- Manual connector runs only
- Business$99/month
- 2,000,000 active events per month
- $40 per additional million events
- Hourly connector sync frequency
- Enterprise$undefined/year
- Custom event volume
- One minute sync frequency
- Unlimited active syncs
Kong
Free- Kong Konnect Free TrialFree
- 30-day free trial
- Full enterprise functionality
- Unlimited gateways
- Kong Konnect Plus$null/month
- Per gateway pricing billed monthly
- Up to 5 Serverless Gateways, 2 Hybrid, 2 Dedicated Cloud Gateways
- 1M API requests included per month
- Kong Insomnia EssentialsFree
- Unlimited projects and CLI access
- Up to 3 Git Sync users
- 1,000 mock server requests per month
- Kong Insomnia Pro$12/month
- Unlimited users with Git Sync access
- Unlimited organizations
- RBAC
Which should you pick?
Choose Jitsu if
- You need event collection.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Linux, Docker, Kubernetes, iOS, Android.
- You also want warehouse destinations.
Choose Kong if
- You need api gateway.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes.
- You also want authentication & authorization.
Questions people ask
- Is Jitsu or Kong better?
- Neither clearly leads. Jitsu starts at Free and Kong at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Jitsu or Kong?
- Jitsu starts at Free and Kong at Free.
- Does Jitsu or Kong run on more platforms?
- Jitsu runs on Web, Linux, Docker, Kubernetes, iOS, Android. Kong runs on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes.
- Can I use Jitsu for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Jitsu best used for?
- Jitsu is most often used for a team paying five figures a year to a customer data platform when all it actually does is send events to snowflake, an engineering group that needs event collection running inside its own vpc for data residency or security review reasons, a product analytics setup that wants raw events in the warehouse as the source of truth rather than trapped in a vendor tool, a startup that needs first-party event collection on its own domain to reduce loss from tracker blocking without paying cdp prices. Of those, a team paying five figures a year to a customer data platform when all it actually does is send events to snowflake and an engineering group that needs event collection running inside its own vpc for data residency or security review reasons are not what Kong is typically brought in for.
- What can Jitsu do that Kong cannot?
- Jitsu covers Event collection, Warehouse destinations, Connector syncs, Transformations. Kong covers API Gateway, Authentication & Authorization, Rate Limiting, Kubernetes.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Jitsu: Is Jitsu the same as Jitsi?
No. Jitsu is an open source event data pipeline. Jitsi is an unrelated video conferencing project.
Kong: Does Kong offer a free trial?
Yes, Kong Konnect offers a 30-day free trial with full enterprise functionality, unlimited gateways, and no credit card required.
SourceJitsu: Can I self-host for free?
Yes. The project is MIT licensed with no usage limits when self-hosted.
Kong: How much does Kong Insomnia Pro cost?
Kong Insomnia Pro is $12 per user per month with 15% savings available for annual billing.
SourceJitsu: How does the cost compare with Segment?
The Business plan is 99 US dollars a month for two million active events, where a per-tracked-user CDP typically costs orders of magnitude more at comparable volume.
Kong: What are Kong Konnect Plus API request limits?
Kong Konnect Plus includes 1M API requests per month; additional requests cost $200 per 1M (maximum 10M per month).
SourceJitsu: Does Jitsu do identity resolution?
No. It transports and transforms events; identity stitching and audiences are not part of the product.
Kong: What is included in Kong Insomnia Enterprise?
Kong Insomnia Enterprise is $45 per user per month with SSO, SCIM, vault integrations, unlimited mock server requests, and Konnect integration.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Jitsu vs Atlantis
- Jitsu vs Visual Studio Code
- Jitsu vs Steampipe
- Jitsu vs Tilt
- Jitsu vs Frappe
- Jitsu vs Penpot
- Jitsu vs GNU Emacs
- Jitsu vs Bazel
- Jitsu vs Eclipse IDE
- Jitsu vs Pants Build
- Jitsu vs Swagger UI
- Jitsu vs Ansible
- Jitsu vs Helm
- Jitsu vs Notepad++
- Jitsu vs Prettier
- Jitsu vs StackBlitz
- Jitsu vs Convoy
- Jitsu vs PocketBase
- Jitsu vs Appwrite
- Jitsu vs Hasura
- Jitsu vs Sanity
- Jitsu vs Tyk
- Jitsu vs WSO2 API Manager
- Jitsu vs Gravitee
- Jitsu vs Janus Gateway
- Jitsu vs Spring Cloud Gateway
- Jitsu vs 3scale
- Jitsu vs Akana
- Jitsu vs Enable Banking
- Jitsu vs Flybits
- Jitsu vs i2c
- Jitsu vs KeystoneJS
- Jitsu vs Liveblocks
- Jitsu vs Moesif
- Kong vs Atlantis
- Kong vs Visual Studio Code
- Kong vs Steampipe
- Kong vs Tilt
- Kong vs Frappe
- Kong vs Penpot
- Kong vs GNU Emacs
- Kong vs Bazel
- Kong vs Eclipse IDE
- Kong vs Pants Build
- Kong vs Swagger UI
- Kong vs Ansible
- Kong vs Helm
- Kong vs Notepad++
- Kong vs Prettier
- Kong vs StackBlitz
- Kong vs Convoy
- Kong vs PocketBase
- Kong vs Appwrite
- Kong vs Hasura
- Kong vs Sanity
- Kong vs Tyk
- Kong vs WSO2 API Manager
- Kong vs Gravitee
- Kong vs Janus Gateway
- Kong vs Spring Cloud Gateway
- Kong vs 3scale
- Kong vs Akana
- Kong vs Enable Banking
- Kong vs Flybits
- Kong vs i2c
- Kong vs KeystoneJS
- Kong vs Liveblocks
- Kong vs Moesif

