APIs · head to head
Kong vs OpenTelemetry

OpenTelemetry
Cloud
Vendor-neutral standard for traces, metrics and logs
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Kong the Plus plan includes 1M API requests a month and charges $200 a month for each additional million; OpenTelemetry genuinely complex to adopt: collectors, pipelines, samplers and exporters are a system to run in their own right
- They diverge on capability: Kong covers API Gateway, OpenTelemetry covers Vendor-neutral SDKs.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Kong and OpenTelemetry actually diverge.
| Attribute | Kong | OpenTelemetry |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | subscription | Open source, no licence fee |
| Platforms | Linux, Docker, Kubernetes | Linux, macOS, Windows, Kubernetes, Docker |
| Category | APIs | Cloud |
| Founded | 2010 | Unknown |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Kong
- API Gateway
- Authentication & Authorization
- Rate Limiting
- Kubernetes
- Consul
- Eureka
- PostgreSQL
- Linux support
Only in OpenTelemetry
- Vendor-neutral SDKs
- Collector
- Three signals
- Auto-instrumentation
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Kong
- API gateway management and routingnot OpenTelemetry
- API development and testingnot OpenTelemetry
- Enterprise API security and governancenot OpenTelemetry
OpenTelemetry
- Instrumenting once and keeping the option to change observability vendor laternot Kong
- Standardising telemetry across services written in different languagesnot Kong
- Routing and filtering telemetry centrally to control observability spendnot Kong
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Kong
- The Plus plan includes 1M API requests a month and charges $200 a month for each additional million
- Plus is capped at 10M requests a month, so growth past that forces an Enterprise contract
- Plus limits published APIs to 20 and includes one Developer Portal, with a second at $200 a month
- SSO and audit logging are Enterprise only
- Enterprise pricing is custom and billed annually
OpenTelemetry
- Genuinely complex to adopt: collectors, pipelines, samplers and exporters are a system to run in their own right
- Language SDKs mature at different rates, so a polyglot estate gets uneven support
- It produces and moves telemetry but does not store or visualise it, so a backend is still required and still billed
Pricing, plan by plan
Kong
Free- Kong Konnect Free TrialFree
- 30-day free trial
- Full enterprise functionality
- Unlimited gateways
- Kong Konnect Plus$null/month
- Per gateway pricing billed monthly
- Up to 5 Serverless Gateways, 2 Hybrid, 2 Dedicated Cloud Gateways
- 1M API requests included per month
- Kong Insomnia EssentialsFree
- Unlimited projects and CLI access
- Up to 3 Git Sync users
- 1,000 mock server requests per month
- Kong Insomnia Pro$12/month
- Unlimited users with Git Sync access
- Unlimited organizations
- RBAC
OpenTelemetry
Free- OpenTelemetryFree
- Full functionality
- No usage limits
- Community support
Which should you pick?
Choose Kong if
- You need api gateway.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes.
- You also want authentication & authorization.
Choose OpenTelemetry if
- You need vendor-neutral sdks.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, macOS, Windows, Kubernetes, Docker.
- You also want collector.
Questions people ask
- Is Kong or OpenTelemetry better?
- Neither clearly leads. Kong starts at Free and OpenTelemetry at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Kong or OpenTelemetry?
- Kong starts at Free and OpenTelemetry at Free.
- Does Kong or OpenTelemetry run on more platforms?
- Kong runs on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes. OpenTelemetry runs on Linux, macOS, Windows, Kubernetes, Docker.
- Can I use Kong for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Kong best used for?
- Kong is most often used for api gateway management and routing, api development and testing, enterprise api security and governance. Of those, api gateway management and routing and api development and testing are not what OpenTelemetry is typically brought in for.
- What can Kong do that OpenTelemetry cannot?
- Kong covers API Gateway, Authentication & Authorization, Rate Limiting, Kubernetes. OpenTelemetry covers Vendor-neutral SDKs, Collector, Three signals, Auto-instrumentation.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Kong: Does Kong offer a free trial?
Yes, Kong Konnect offers a 30-day free trial with full enterprise functionality, unlimited gateways, and no credit card required.
SourceOpenTelemetry: Is OpenTelemetry free?
Yes, open source under the CNCF. What you pay for is the backend you export to.
Kong: How much does Kong Insomnia Pro cost?
Kong Insomnia Pro is $12 per user per month with 15% savings available for annual billing.
SourceOpenTelemetry: Does OpenTelemetry replace Datadog or Grafana?
No. It replaces their proprietary agents and instrumentation libraries. You still need a backend to store and query the data.
Kong: What are Kong Konnect Plus API request limits?
Kong Konnect Plus includes 1M API requests per month; additional requests cost $200 per 1M (maximum 10M per month).
SourceOpenTelemetry: Why adopt a vendor-neutral standard?
Because instrumentation is the expensive part. Once code emits OTel, changing observability vendor is a collector config change instead of re-instrumenting every service.
Kong: What is included in Kong Insomnia Enterprise?
Kong Insomnia Enterprise is $45 per user per month with SSO, SCIM, vault integrations, unlimited mock server requests, and Konnect integration.
SourceRelated pages
More on OpenTelemetry
Other head to heads
- Kong vs Convoy
- Kong vs PocketBase
- Kong vs Appwrite
- Kong vs Hasura
- Kong vs Sanity
- Kong vs Tyk
- Kong vs WSO2 API Manager
- Kong vs Gravitee
- Kong vs Janus Gateway
- Kong vs Spring Cloud Gateway
- Kong vs 3scale
- Kong vs Akana
- Kong vs Enable Banking
- Kong vs Flybits
- Kong vs i2c
- Kong vs KeystoneJS
- Kong vs Liveblocks
- Kong vs Moesif
- Kong vs Zipkin
- Kong vs Grafana Cloud
- Kong vs VictoriaMetrics
- Kong vs OpenEBS
- Kong vs Fly.io
- Kong vs Cerebrium
- Kong vs Northflank
- Kong vs Oracle Cloud
- Kong vs Porter
- Kong vs Serverless Framework
- Kong vs CapRover
- Kong vs Coolify
- Kong vs IBM Cloud
- Kong vs Koyeb
- Kong vs Microsoft Azure
- Kong vs Nitric
- Kong vs Nomad
- OpenTelemetry vs Convoy
- OpenTelemetry vs PocketBase
- OpenTelemetry vs Appwrite
- OpenTelemetry vs Hasura
- OpenTelemetry vs Sanity
- OpenTelemetry vs Tyk
- OpenTelemetry vs WSO2 API Manager
- OpenTelemetry vs Gravitee
- OpenTelemetry vs Janus Gateway
- OpenTelemetry vs Spring Cloud Gateway
- OpenTelemetry vs 3scale
- OpenTelemetry vs Akana
- OpenTelemetry vs Enable Banking
- OpenTelemetry vs Flybits
- OpenTelemetry vs i2c
- OpenTelemetry vs KeystoneJS
- OpenTelemetry vs Liveblocks
- OpenTelemetry vs Moesif
- OpenTelemetry vs Zipkin
- OpenTelemetry vs Grafana Cloud
- OpenTelemetry vs VictoriaMetrics
- OpenTelemetry vs OpenEBS
- OpenTelemetry vs Fly.io
- OpenTelemetry vs Cerebrium
- OpenTelemetry vs Northflank
- OpenTelemetry vs Oracle Cloud
- OpenTelemetry vs Porter
- OpenTelemetry vs Serverless Framework
- OpenTelemetry vs CapRover
- OpenTelemetry vs Coolify
- OpenTelemetry vs IBM Cloud
- OpenTelemetry vs Koyeb
- OpenTelemetry vs Microsoft Azure
- OpenTelemetry vs Nitric
- OpenTelemetry vs Nomad

