Backup · head to head
Keepit vs rustic

rustic
Backup
Rust reimplementation of restic that reads and writes the same repository format
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only rustic has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Keepit search functionality is very limited with restrictive search strings and poor filter options; rustic the project is small with a short list of active maintainers, so bus factor is a genuine consideration for software whose job is to still work in five years.
- They diverge on capability: Keepit covers Vendor-independent storage, rustic covers restic format compatibility.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Keepit and rustic actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Backup).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Keepit
- Vendor-independent storage
- Immutable backup
- Blockchain verification
- Unlimited retention
- Granular restore
- API access
- Microsoft 365
- Google Workspace
Only in rustic
- restic format compatibility
- Configuration profiles
- Deduplicated encrypted backups
- Cold and append only storage support
- Multiple back ends
- Library crates
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Keepit
- Data protectionnot rustic
- Disaster recoverynot rustic
- Business continuitynot rustic
- Ransomware protectionnot rustic
- Compliancenot rustic
rustic
- An existing restic user who wants configuration files rather than long command lines in cronnot Keepit
- Backing up a memory constrained machine where the reference implementation is uncomfortably heavynot Keepit
- Writing to append only or cold object storage where the default tooling assumes rewritable bucketsnot Keepit
- Keeping a second implementation available so a long lived archive does not depend on one codebasenot Keepit
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Keepit
- Search functionality is very limited with restrictive search strings and poor filter options
- Download speeds during restoration are slow, particularly for mailbox restorations
- Console interface is complex and unintuitive, making file retrieval time-consuming
- Limited support for advanced features like Power Automate flows and manual backup job initiation
- Primarily targets SaaS applications and is not a single platform for on-premises workloads, VMs, or endpoint backup
rustic
- The project is small with a short list of active maintainers, so bus factor is a genuine consideration for software whose job is to still work in five years.
- It inherits the restic repository format, so design limits in that format, including the cost of pruning large repositories, are inherited rather than fixed.
- Command names, flags and behaviour do not map one to one onto restic, so scripts and runbooks need rewriting rather than a binary swap.
- Far fewer people have performed a real restore from it under pressure, and backup software is one of the few categories where being second most used is itself a risk.
- Alternating between rustic and restic against one repository works but doubles the surface for a version incompatibility to corrupt state, so most operators should pick one and stay with it.
Pricing, plan by plan
Keepit
$3/month- Keepit Business$3/month
- Immutable backup
- Unlimited retention
- Blockchain verification
rustic
Free- rusticFree
- Full functionality, no data limit
- All supported storage back ends
- Community support via GitHub
Which should you pick?
Choose rustic if
- You need restic format compatibility.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, macOS, Windows.
- You also want configuration profiles.
Questions people ask
- Is Keepit or rustic better?
- Neither clearly leads. Keepit starts at $3/month and rustic at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Keepit or rustic?
- rustic has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at $3/month for Keepit and Free for rustic.
- Does Keepit or rustic run on more platforms?
- Keepit runs on Web. rustic runs on Linux, macOS, Windows.
- Can I use rustic for free?
- Yes. rustic has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Keepit starts at $3/month.
- What is Keepit best used for?
- Keepit is most often used for data protection, disaster recovery, business continuity, ransomware protection. Of those, data protection and disaster recovery are not what rustic is typically brought in for.
- What can Keepit do that rustic cannot?
- Keepit covers Vendor-independent storage, Immutable backup, Blockchain verification, Unlimited retention. rustic covers restic format compatibility, Configuration profiles, Deduplicated encrypted backups, Cold and append only storage support.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Keepit: What SaaS applications does Keepit protect?
Keepit provides backup for Microsoft 365 workloads (Teams, Exchange, OneDrive, SharePoint, Groups, Public Folders), Microsoft Entra ID, Google, Salesforce, and 15 SaaS applications total as of 2026, with plans to add more.
Sourcerustic: Can it read my existing restic repository?
Yes, that is the point of the project. Take a copy and verify before you rely on it, as with any change to backup tooling.
Keepit: How is Keepit priced?
Keepit uses custom pricing starting at $5 per seat monthly. Enterprise plans are custom quoted, with median annual contracts around $60,270. The pricing includes unlimited data storage.
Sourcerustic: Should I switch from restic?
Only for a specific reason such as configuration profiles, memory use or cold storage handling. Compatibility means there is no cost to trying and no cost to going back.
Keepit: Does Keepit guarantee immutability?
Yes, Keepit's architecture runs on secure, private infrastructure offering data immutability to prevent ransomware and accidental deletion.
Sourcerustic: Is it production ready?
It is used in production by a small community, but it is younger and less exercised than the implementation it is compatible with. Test restores accordingly.
rustic: Does it support the same back ends?
The common ones, including local, SFTP, S3 compatible storage and rclone. Check the current list before committing to an unusual target.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Keepit vs Spanning Backup
- Keepit vs CloudAlly
- Keepit vs Backupify
- Keepit vs Druva Data Resiliency Cloud
- Keepit vs Redstor
- Keepit vs AvePoint Cloud Backup
- Keepit vs SysCloud
- Keepit vs HYCU
- Keepit vs Rewind
- Keepit vs OwnBackup
- Keepit vs Velero
- Keepit vs MSP360 Backup
- Keepit vs AOMEI Backupper
- Keepit vs Apple Time Machine
- Keepit vs Arcserve UDP
- Keepit vs Axcient x360Recover
- Keepit vs Bacula Enterprise
- Keepit vs Kopia
- Keepit vs Borg Backup
- Keepit vs Restic
- Keepit vs Proxmox Backup Server
- Keepit vs Duplicacy
- Keepit vs UrBackup
- Keepit vs Acronis Cyber Protect
- Keepit vs Portworx Backup
- Keepit vs HPE StoreOnce
- Keepit vs BDRShield
- Keepit vs Quest NetVault Backup
- Keepit vs StorageCraft ShadowProtect
- Keepit vs Trilio
- Keepit vs Unitrends Backup
- rustic vs Spanning Backup
- rustic vs CloudAlly
- rustic vs Backupify
- rustic vs Druva Data Resiliency Cloud
- rustic vs Redstor
- rustic vs AvePoint Cloud Backup
- rustic vs SysCloud
- rustic vs HYCU
- rustic vs Rewind
- rustic vs OwnBackup
- rustic vs Velero
- rustic vs MSP360 Backup
- rustic vs AOMEI Backupper
- rustic vs Apple Time Machine
- rustic vs Arcserve UDP
- rustic vs Axcient x360Recover
- rustic vs Bacula Enterprise
- rustic vs Kopia
- rustic vs Borg Backup
- rustic vs Restic
- rustic vs Proxmox Backup Server
- rustic vs Duplicacy
- rustic vs UrBackup
- rustic vs Acronis Cyber Protect
- rustic vs Portworx Backup
- rustic vs HPE StoreOnce
- rustic vs BDRShield
- rustic vs Quest NetVault Backup
- rustic vs StorageCraft ShadowProtect
- rustic vs Trilio
- rustic vs Unitrends Backup

