Backup · head to head
Acronis Cyber Protect vs rustic

Acronis Cyber Protect
Backup
Integrated backup and cybersecurity protection
- From
- $68/year
- Rated
- -

rustic
Backup
Rust reimplementation of restic that reads and writes the same repository format
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only rustic has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Acronis Cyber Protect technical support response is slow and inconsistent for resolving issues; rustic the project is small with a short list of active maintainers, so bus factor is a genuine consideration for software whose job is to still work in five years.
- They diverge on capability: Acronis Cyber Protect covers AI-based ransomware protection, rustic covers restic format compatibility.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Acronis Cyber Protect and rustic actually diverge.
| Attribute | Acronis Cyber Protect | rustic |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $68/year | Free |
| Pricing model | Unknown | Open source, no licence fee |
| Free tier | No | Yes |
| Platforms | Windows, Mac, Linux, Cloud, On-premises | Linux, macOS, Windows |
| Founded | 2003 | Unknown |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Backup).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Acronis Cyber Protect
- AI-based ransomware protection
- Continuous data protection
- Disk cloning
- Universal restore
- Backup validation
- Vulnerability assessments
- Microsoft 365
- Google Workspace
Only in rustic
- restic format compatibility
- Configuration profiles
- Deduplicated encrypted backups
- Cold and append only storage support
- Multiple back ends
- Library crates
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Acronis Cyber Protect
- Data protectionnot rustic
- Disaster recoverynot rustic
- Business continuitynot rustic
- Ransomware protectionnot rustic
- Compliancenot rustic
rustic
- An existing restic user who wants configuration files rather than long command lines in cronnot Acronis Cyber Protect
- Backing up a memory constrained machine where the reference implementation is uncomfortably heavynot Acronis Cyber Protect
- Writing to append only or cold object storage where the default tooling assumes rewritable bucketsnot Acronis Cyber Protect
- Keeping a second implementation available so a long lived archive does not depend on one codebasenot Acronis Cyber Protect
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Acronis Cyber Protect
- Technical support response is slow and inconsistent for resolving issues
- UI performance is slow when handling operations like checking backup status or initiating restores
- Backup speed can be slow with limited replication options
- Complex pricing policies with multiple licensing models make cost prediction difficult
- Antivirus engine can significantly impact system performance on client machines
rustic
- The project is small with a short list of active maintainers, so bus factor is a genuine consideration for software whose job is to still work in five years.
- It inherits the restic repository format, so design limits in that format, including the cost of pruning large repositories, are inherited rather than fixed.
- Command names, flags and behaviour do not map one to one onto restic, so scripts and runbooks need rewriting rather than a binary swap.
- Far fewer people have performed a real restore from it under pressure, and backup software is one of the few categories where being second most used is itself a risk.
- Alternating between rustic and restic against one repository works but doubles the surface for a version incompatibility to corrupt state, so most operators should pick one and stay with it.
Pricing, plan by plan
Acronis Cyber Protect
$68/year- Standard$68/year
- Backup and recovery
- Basic security
- Advanced$129/year
- Enhanced security
- Ransomware protection
- Anti-malware
- Business$5.67/month
- Enterprise features
- Support
- Multiple workloads
rustic
Free- rusticFree
- Full functionality, no data limit
- All supported storage back ends
- Community support via GitHub
Which should you pick?
Choose Acronis Cyber Protect if
- You need ai-based ransomware protection.
- You work on Windows, Mac, Linux, Cloud, On-premises.
- You also want continuous data protection.
Choose rustic if
- You need restic format compatibility.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, macOS, Windows.
- You also want configuration profiles.
Questions people ask
- Is Acronis Cyber Protect or rustic better?
- Neither clearly leads. Acronis Cyber Protect starts at $68/year and rustic at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Acronis Cyber Protect or rustic?
- rustic has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at $68/year for Acronis Cyber Protect and Free for rustic.
- Does Acronis Cyber Protect or rustic run on more platforms?
- Acronis Cyber Protect runs on Windows, Mac, Linux, Cloud, On-premises. rustic runs on Linux, macOS, Windows.
- Can I use rustic for free?
- Yes. rustic has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Acronis Cyber Protect starts at $68/year.
- What is Acronis Cyber Protect best used for?
- Acronis Cyber Protect is most often used for data protection, disaster recovery, business continuity, ransomware protection. Of those, data protection and disaster recovery are not what rustic is typically brought in for.
- What can Acronis Cyber Protect do that rustic cannot?
- Acronis Cyber Protect covers AI-based ransomware protection, Continuous data protection, Disk cloning, Universal restore. rustic covers restic format compatibility, Configuration profiles, Deduplicated encrypted backups, Cold and append only storage support.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Acronis Cyber Protect: What does Acronis Cyber Protect include?
Acronis Cyber Protect combines backup, disaster recovery, next-generation anti-malware, cybersecurity, and endpoint management in a single platform for complete cyber resilience.
Sourcerustic: Can it read my existing restic repository?
Yes, that is the point of the project. Take a copy and verify before you rely on it, as with any change to backup tooling.
Acronis Cyber Protect: What are the main pricing plans for Acronis Cyber Protect?
Acronis offers Cyber Protect Standard at $68/year, Cyber Protect Advanced at $129+/year for consumers, and business plans at $5.67-$8.60/month. Acronis runs three licensing models: per-workload, per-GB, and solution-based.
Sourcerustic: Should I switch from restic?
Only for a specific reason such as configuration profiles, memory use or cold storage handling. Compatibility means there is no cost to trying and no cost to going back.
Acronis Cyber Protect: Does Acronis offer an API for integrations?
Yes, Acronis exposes REST APIs allowing partners to integrate existing solutions and create new ones. They provide 300+ pre-built integrations and support both inbound (CyberApps) and outbound API integrations.
Sourcerustic: Is it production ready?
It is used in production by a small community, but it is younger and less exercised than the implementation it is compatible with. Test restores accordingly.
Acronis Cyber Protect: Can Acronis Cyber Protect be deployed on-premises?
Yes, Acronis Cyber Protect supports multiple deployment options including on-premises and SaaS, giving organizations flexibility in how they manage their backup and disaster recovery infrastructure.
Sourcerustic: Does it support the same back ends?
The common ones, including local, SFTP, S3 compatible storage and rclone. Check the current list before committing to an unusual target.
Related pages
More on Acronis Cyber Protect
Other head to heads
- Acronis Cyber Protect vs Cohesity
- Acronis Cyber Protect vs IBM Storage Protect
- Acronis Cyber Protect vs HPE StoreOnce
- Acronis Cyber Protect vs StorageCraft ShadowProtect
- Acronis Cyber Protect vs Spanning Backup
- Acronis Cyber Protect vs Borg Backup
- Acronis Cyber Protect vs Duplicacy
- Acronis Cyber Protect vs Restic
- Acronis Cyber Protect vs Altaro VM Backup
- Acronis Cyber Protect vs Bacula
- Acronis Cyber Protect vs Comet Backup
- Acronis Cyber Protect vs NAKIVO Backup & Replication
- Acronis Cyber Protect vs CloudCasa
- Acronis Cyber Protect vs Datto Backup
- Acronis Cyber Protect vs Kopia
- Acronis Cyber Protect vs MSP360 Backup
- Acronis Cyber Protect vs Cohesity DataProtect
- Acronis Cyber Protect vs Proxmox Backup Server
- Acronis Cyber Protect vs UrBackup
- Acronis Cyber Protect vs Portworx Backup
- Acronis Cyber Protect vs Velero
- Acronis Cyber Protect vs HYCU
- Acronis Cyber Protect vs BDRShield
- Acronis Cyber Protect vs Quest NetVault Backup
- Acronis Cyber Protect vs Redstor
- Acronis Cyber Protect vs SysCloud
- Acronis Cyber Protect vs Trilio
- Acronis Cyber Protect vs Unitrends Backup
- rustic vs Cohesity
- rustic vs IBM Storage Protect
- rustic vs HPE StoreOnce
- rustic vs StorageCraft ShadowProtect
- rustic vs Spanning Backup
- rustic vs Borg Backup
- rustic vs Duplicacy
- rustic vs Restic
- rustic vs Altaro VM Backup
- rustic vs Bacula
- rustic vs Comet Backup
- rustic vs NAKIVO Backup & Replication
- rustic vs CloudCasa
- rustic vs Datto Backup
- rustic vs Kopia
- rustic vs MSP360 Backup
- rustic vs Cohesity DataProtect
- rustic vs Proxmox Backup Server
- rustic vs UrBackup
- rustic vs Portworx Backup
- rustic vs Velero
- rustic vs HYCU
- rustic vs BDRShield
- rustic vs Quest NetVault Backup
- rustic vs Redstor
- rustic vs SysCloud
- rustic vs Trilio
- rustic vs Unitrends Backup
