Softwr

Maritime · head to head

INTTRA vs Kaleris

INTTRA logo

INTTRA

Maritime

Ocean shipping network platform

From
$0.5/per-transaction
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite
Kaleris logo

Kaleris

Maritime

Terminal operating, yard, rail and vessel software assembled from acquired supply chain brands

From
On request
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite

The short version

  • Each has a real cost: INTTRA iNTTRA's own homepage as captured by the Internet Archive on 18 January 2022 confirms it operates under E2open with a 'Learn About E2open' link on its own navigation, and pricing remains bare contact-sales with no named editions; a customer testimonial quoted on the same page (not INTTRA's own pricing) cites Bill of Lading fee savings of $25 to $75 per shipment from consolidating onto the platform; Kaleris the portfolio was assembled by acquisition, so the single platform description is commercial rather than technical, and connecting two Kaleris products often requires professional services and a custom interface.
  • They diverge on capability: INTTRA covers Electronic booking, Kaleris covers Terminal operating system.
  • Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which INTTRA and Kaleris actually diverge.

Attributes where INTTRA and Kaleris differ
AttributeINTTRAKaleris
Starting price$0.5/per-transactionOn request
Pricing modeltransactionquote
PlatformsWeb, ApiWeb, On-premise, Private cloud
Founded2000Unknown

Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Maritime).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in INTTRA

  • Electronic booking
  • Container tracking
  • Documentation
  • Rate management
  • TMS platforms
  • ERP systems
  • Carrier systems
  • Web support

Only in Kaleris

  • Terminal operating system
  • Yard management
  • Transportation management
  • Carrier and vessel solutions
  • Rail visibility
  • Maintenance and repair operations
  • Execution and visibility platform
  • Equipment control integration

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

INTTRA

  • Booking and managing ocean shipments across global carrier networks from central platformnot Kaleris
  • Reducing shipping costs by 25-30% through streamlined consolidation operationsnot Kaleris
  • Decreasing operational staffing from six to two employees per 100 shipmentsnot Kaleris
  • Standardizing electronic data conversion and transmission faster than manual processesnot Kaleris
  • Managing over 1.5 million container movements across 120+ countriesnot Kaleris
  • Performing real-time regulatory compliance verification for export and import requirementsnot Kaleris

Kaleris

  • A container terminal replacing a legacy or in-house terminal operating system before an automation programmenot INTTRA
  • A port authority standardising several terminals on one operating system and reporting layernot INTTRA
  • An ocean carrier that needs stowage planning and vessel performance tooling alongside terminal systemsnot INTTRA
  • A rail or intermodal operator trying to reduce demurrage exposure with asset level visibilitynot INTTRA

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

INTTRA

  • INTTRA's own homepage as captured by the Internet Archive on 18 January 2022 confirms it operates under E2open with a 'Learn About E2open' link on its own navigation, and pricing remains bare contact-sales with no named editions; a customer testimonial quoted on the same page (not INTTRA's own pricing) cites Bill of Lading fee savings of $25 to $75 per shipment from consolidating onto the platform

Kaleris

  • The portfolio was assembled by acquisition, so the single platform description is commercial rather than technical, and connecting two Kaleris products often requires professional services and a custom interface.
  • A terminal operating system implementation runs 12 to 24 months with parallel operation, and the software licence is a minor line next to integration, equipment interfaces and retraining crane and gate staff.
  • Private equity ownership means the roadmap is shaped by acquisition strategy and an eventual exit, and a terminal signing a decade-long dependency has no visibility of who the next owner will be.
  • Configuration expertise is concentrated in the vendor and a small consultancy pool, so terminals end up buying vendor services for changes an internal team should be able to make.
  • The strength is container handling, and bulk, breakbulk and ro-ro terminals get a thinner functional fit that has to be closed with configuration and workarounds.

Pricing, plan by plan

INTTRA

$0.5/per-transaction
  • Enterprise$1000/month
    • E-booking
    • Tracking
    • Documentation

Kaleris

On request
  • Kaleris platform$undefined/year
    • Quoted per site, by throughput and modules taken
    • Implementation and integration services are the larger share of first-year cost
    • Equipment and gate interfaces scoped and priced individually

Which should you pick?

Choose INTTRA if

  • You need electronic booking.
  • You work on Web, Api.
  • You also want container tracking.
INTTRA review

Choose Kaleris if

  • You need terminal operating system.
  • You work on Web, On-premise, Private cloud.
  • You also want yard management.
Kaleris review

Questions people ask

Is INTTRA or Kaleris better?
Neither clearly leads. INTTRA starts at $0.5/per-transaction and Kaleris at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, INTTRA or Kaleris?
INTTRA starts at $0.5/per-transaction and Kaleris at On request.
Does INTTRA or Kaleris run on more platforms?
INTTRA runs on Web, Api. Kaleris runs on Web, On-premise, Private cloud.
What is INTTRA best used for?
INTTRA is most often used for booking and managing ocean shipments across global carrier networks from central platform, reducing shipping costs by 25-30% through streamlined consolidation operations, decreasing operational staffing from six to two employees per 100 shipments, standardizing electronic data conversion and transmission faster than manual processes. Of those, booking and managing ocean shipments across global carrier networks from central platform and reducing shipping costs by 25-30% through streamlined consolidation operations are not what Kaleris is typically brought in for.
What can INTTRA do that Kaleris cannot?
INTTRA covers Electronic booking, Container tracking, Documentation, Rate management. Kaleris covers Terminal operating system, Yard management, Transportation management, Carrier and vessel solutions.

Answered from the vendors’ own pages

INTTRA: How much can INTTRA help reduce ocean shipping costs?

INTTRA users report 25-30% cost reductions through operational efficiency, with some achieving savings of $25-$75 per Bill of Lading through the consolidation platform.

Source
Kaleris: Is Kaleris the same thing as Navis?

No. Navis is the terminal operating system product line, now owned by Kaleris after Cargotec sold it to Accel-KKR in 2021. Kaleris is the parent group and sells several other product lines alongside it.

INTTRA: Can INTTRA help with regulatory compliance for international shipments?

Yes, INTTRA provides real-time verification of changing export and import regulations, helping organizations like Etihad Airways manage constantly evolving international shipping requirements.

Source
Kaleris: Who owns Kaleris?

It is backed by the private equity firm Accel-KKR and assembled from acquired software businesses.

Kaleris: How long does a terminal operating system deployment take?

Plan for 12 to 24 months at a working container terminal, including parallel running. Anything shorter usually means a limited scope or a small facility.

Kaleris: Does it suit bulk or breakbulk terminals?

Less well. The functional depth is in container handling, and other cargo types require significant configuration.

Share

Related pages

More on INTTRA

More on Kaleris

Keep looking

Other head to heads