Softwr

Maritime · head to head

INTTRA vs NAPA Fleet Intelligence

INTTRA logo

INTTRA

Maritime

Ocean shipping network platform

From
$0.5/per-transaction
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite
NAPA Fleet Intelligence logo

NAPA Fleet Intelligence

Maritime

Vessel performance, emissions compliance and voyage optimisation built on NAPA hydrodynamic ship models

From
On request
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite

The short version

  • Each has a real cost: INTTRA iNTTRA's own homepage as captured by the Internet Archive on 18 January 2022 confirms it operates under E2open with a 'Learn About E2open' link on its own navigation, and pricing remains bare contact-sales with no named editions; a customer testimonial quoted on the same page (not INTTRA's own pricing) cites Bill of Lading fee savings of $25 to $75 per shipment from consolidating onto the platform; NAPA Fleet Intelligence model-derived performance from AIS and noon reports is an estimate, so it supports fleet screening and dispute evidence better than fine-grained optimisation of a single ship.
  • They diverge on capability: INTTRA covers Electronic booking, NAPA Fleet Intelligence covers NAPA Performance Model.
  • Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which INTTRA and NAPA Fleet Intelligence actually diverge.

Attributes where INTTRA and NAPA Fleet Intelligence differ
AttributeINTTRANAPA Fleet Intelligence
Starting price$0.5/per-transactionOn request
Pricing modeltransactionquote
PlatformsWeb, ApiWeb, Cloud
Founded2000Unknown

Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Maritime).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in INTTRA

  • Electronic booking
  • Container tracking
  • Documentation
  • Rate management
  • TMS platforms
  • ERP systems
  • Carrier systems
  • Web support

Only in NAPA Fleet Intelligence

  • NAPA Performance Model
  • AIS-based analysis
  • Voyage optimisation
  • Emissions reporting
  • Hull and propeller performance
  • Fleet benchmarking
  • Onboard integration
  • Passenger ship modules

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

INTTRA

  • Booking and managing ocean shipments across global carrier networks from central platformnot NAPA Fleet Intelligence
  • Reducing shipping costs by 25-30% through streamlined consolidation operationsnot NAPA Fleet Intelligence
  • Decreasing operational staffing from six to two employees per 100 shipmentsnot NAPA Fleet Intelligence
  • Standardizing electronic data conversion and transmission faster than manual processesnot NAPA Fleet Intelligence
  • Managing over 1.5 million container movements across 120+ countriesnot NAPA Fleet Intelligence
  • Performing real-time regulatory compliance verification for export and import requirementsnot NAPA Fleet Intelligence

NAPA Fleet Intelligence

  • A charterer assessing hull performance of vessels it does not own using AIS data alonenot INTTRA
  • An owner needing auditable CII and EU ETS numbers rather than spreadsheet estimatesnot INTTRA
  • A technical manager deciding whether hull cleaning this quarter pays for itself in fuelnot INTTRA
  • A fleet arguing a charter party speed and consumption claim and needing model-backed evidencenot INTTRA

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

INTTRA

  • INTTRA's own homepage as captured by the Internet Archive on 18 January 2022 confirms it operates under E2open with a 'Learn About E2open' link on its own navigation, and pricing remains bare contact-sales with no named editions; a customer testimonial quoted on the same page (not INTTRA's own pricing) cites Bill of Lading fee savings of $25 to $75 per shipment from consolidating onto the platform

NAPA Fleet Intelligence

  • Model-derived performance from AIS and noon reports is an estimate, so it supports fleet screening and dispute evidence better than fine-grained optimisation of a single ship.
  • Pricing is per vessel and unpublished, and modular scoping means the quote you compare against a competitor may not cover the same functions.
  • Building the vessel-specific performance model requires hull form and design data that owners of older or second-hand tonnage often do not have, which turns onboarding into a data hunt.
  • It is a monitoring and advisory layer, not a system of record; you still run a separate planned maintenance system, a chartering system and a crewing system.
  • NAPA is strongest in the design and stability world, and its operational reference base, while real, is smaller than the pure voyage-optimisation specialists, so integration breadth with commercial shipping software is narrower.

Pricing, plan by plan

INTTRA

$0.5/per-transaction
  • Enterprise$1000/month
    • E-booking
    • Tracking
    • Documentation

NAPA Fleet Intelligence

On request
  • NAPA Fleet Intelligence$undefined/year
    • Licensed per vessel with modular scope
    • Fleet agreements and multi-year terms negotiated
    • Vessel model creation may be a one-off setup charge

Which should you pick?

Choose INTTRA if

  • You need electronic booking.
  • You work on Web, Api.
  • You also want container tracking.
INTTRA review

Choose NAPA Fleet Intelligence if

  • You need napa performance model.
  • You work on Web, Cloud.
  • You also want ais-based analysis.
NAPA Fleet Intelligence review

Questions people ask

Is INTTRA or NAPA Fleet Intelligence better?
Neither clearly leads. INTTRA starts at $0.5/per-transaction and NAPA Fleet Intelligence at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, INTTRA or NAPA Fleet Intelligence?
INTTRA starts at $0.5/per-transaction and NAPA Fleet Intelligence at On request.
Does INTTRA or NAPA Fleet Intelligence run on more platforms?
INTTRA runs on Web, Api. NAPA Fleet Intelligence runs on Web, Cloud.
What is INTTRA best used for?
INTTRA is most often used for booking and managing ocean shipments across global carrier networks from central platform, reducing shipping costs by 25-30% through streamlined consolidation operations, decreasing operational staffing from six to two employees per 100 shipments, standardizing electronic data conversion and transmission faster than manual processes. Of those, booking and managing ocean shipments across global carrier networks from central platform and reducing shipping costs by 25-30% through streamlined consolidation operations are not what NAPA Fleet Intelligence is typically brought in for.
What can INTTRA do that NAPA Fleet Intelligence cannot?
INTTRA covers Electronic booking, Container tracking, Documentation, Rate management. NAPA Fleet Intelligence covers NAPA Performance Model, AIS-based analysis, Voyage optimisation, Emissions reporting.

Answered from the vendors’ own pages

INTTRA: How much can INTTRA help reduce ocean shipping costs?

INTTRA users report 25-30% cost reductions through operational efficiency, with some achieving savings of $25-$75 per Bill of Lading through the consolidation platform.

Source
NAPA Fleet Intelligence: Do we need onboard sensors?

No. NAPA can produce performance analysis from AIS and noon reports using its hydrodynamic model, though instrumented data improves accuracy.

INTTRA: Can INTTRA help with regulatory compliance for international shipments?

Yes, INTTRA provides real-time verification of changing export and import regulations, helping organizations like Etihad Airways manage constantly evolving international shipping requirements.

Source
NAPA Fleet Intelligence: Does it handle EU ETS and CII?

Yes, emissions calculation and regulatory reporting for EU MRV, IMO DCS, CII and EU ETS are covered.

NAPA Fleet Intelligence: Is it the same NAPA used for ship design?

Yes, same company, and Fleet Intelligence reuses the hydrodynamic modelling from that business.

NAPA Fleet Intelligence: Is pricing published?

No. It is licensed per vessel by module, quoted per fleet.

Share

Related pages

More on INTTRA

More on NAPA Fleet Intelligence

Keep looking

Other head to heads