Manufacturing · head to head
JobBOSS² vs Propel

JobBOSS²
Manufacturing
ECI shop control system formed by merging JobBOSS and E2 Shop System into one product line
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Propel
Manufacturing
PLM, quality and product information management built on the Salesforce platform
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: JobBOSS² the product is a merger of two legacy systems, so existing JobBOSS and E2 customers face a migration and retraining project whose cost is negotiated case by case and is easy to underestimate.; Propel your product data lives in a Salesforce org, so a future decision to leave Salesforce becomes a PLM migration as well as a CRM one, and the extraction is not trivial.
- They diverge on capability: JobBOSS² covers Estimating and quoting, Propel covers Item and BOM management.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which JobBOSS² and Propel actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (quote), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Manufacturing).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in JobBOSS²
- Estimating and quoting
- Order and job management
- Shop floor data collection
- Scheduling
- Job costing
- Integrated accounting
Only in Propel
- Item and BOM management
- Change management
- Quality management
- Product information management
- Supplier collaboration
- Native Salesforce
- Licence types
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
JobBOSS²
- A job shop quoting from spreadsheets that wants estimating, routing and costing in one systemnot Propel
- An existing JobBOSS or E2 Shop System customer evaluating whether to migrate or replacenot Propel
- A make to order fabricator that needs accounting inside the manufacturing system rather than alongside itnot Propel
- A shop that wants operator time capture at work centres to make job costing reflect what actually happenednot Propel
Propel
- A medical device company needing linked design control and CAPA records for an ISO 13485 audit without an on-premise PLM programmenot JobBOSS²
- A consumer products firm publishing the same product record to engineering, packaging and e-commerce teamsnot JobBOSS²
- A company already standardised on Salesforce that wants product data governed with the same admin skills as the CRMnot JobBOSS²
- A hardware manufacturer routing customer complaints straight to the part revision and supplier that caused themnot JobBOSS²
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
JobBOSS²
- The product is a merger of two legacy systems, so existing JobBOSS and E2 customers face a migration and retraining project whose cost is negotiated case by case and is easy to underestimate.
- ECI is a private equity owned portfolio company with many vertical products, and buyers should read renewal, uplift and support tier terms carefully because the commercial model is built around long term contracted revenue.
- Machine connectivity is limited, so shop floor data comes from operators clocking in and out rather than from controllers, and any automatic utilisation measurement needs a separate monitoring product.
- Reporting is rigid compared with a modern system and most shops end up exporting to Excel for anything beyond the supplied reports, which reintroduces the spreadsheets the system was bought to eliminate.
- The user interface carries its lineage and takes longer to learn than a current generation web application, which matters most for occasional users such as estimators and purchasing staff.
Propel
- Your product data lives in a Salesforce org, so a future decision to leave Salesforce becomes a PLM migration as well as a CRM one, and the extraction is not trivial.
- CAD data management is handled through connectors rather than natively; Propel manages metadata and files well but is not a substitute for a CAD vault on large assemblies.
- The published cost bands are extremely wide, from 10,000 to 500,000 US dollars a year, and setup can approach the annual licence, so early budgeting without a scoped quote is close to meaningless.
- Licence roles are split across Performance, Quality, Enrichment, Collaboration and Partner types, and buyers frequently discover mid-project that a user needs a more expensive role than budgeted.
- Salesforce platform limits such as governor limits, API call ceilings and storage allowances apply, and organisations with very large BOMs or heavy integration traffic hit them in ways a purpose-built PLM would not surface.
Pricing, plan by plan
JobBOSS²
On request- JobBOSS²$undefined/year
- Quoting through invoicing for job shops
- Shop floor data collection and scheduling
- Hosted or on premises deployment
Propel
On request- Propel$undefined/year
- Annual user-based licensing in role types
- Salesforce platform access included in each licence
- Indicative small deployment band of 10,000 to 150,000 USD a year plus 10,000 to 25,000 setup
Which should you pick?
Choose JobBOSS² if
- You need estimating and quoting.
- You work on Windows, Web.
- You also want order and job management.
Choose Propel if
- You need item and bom management.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android, Cloud, API.
- You also want change management.
Questions people ask
- Is JobBOSS² or Propel better?
- Neither clearly leads. JobBOSS² starts at On request and Propel at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, JobBOSS² or Propel?
- JobBOSS² starts at On request and Propel at On request.
- Does JobBOSS² or Propel run on more platforms?
- JobBOSS² runs on Windows, Web. Propel runs on Web, iOS, Android, Cloud, API.
- What is JobBOSS² best used for?
- JobBOSS² is most often used for a job shop quoting from spreadsheets that wants estimating, routing and costing in one system, an existing jobboss or e2 shop system customer evaluating whether to migrate or replace, a make to order fabricator that needs accounting inside the manufacturing system rather than alongside it, a shop that wants operator time capture at work centres to make job costing reflect what actually happened. Of those, a job shop quoting from spreadsheets that wants estimating, routing and costing in one system and an existing jobboss or e2 shop system customer evaluating whether to migrate or replace are not what Propel is typically brought in for.
- What can JobBOSS² do that Propel cannot?
- JobBOSS² covers Estimating and quoting, Order and job management, Shop floor data collection, Scheduling. Propel covers Item and BOM management, Change management, Quality management, Product information management.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
JobBOSS²: What happened to E2 Shop System?
ECI acquired it and merged it with JobBOSS into the combined JobBOSS² line. Legacy customers are directed towards migration.
Propel: Do I need to buy Salesforce separately?
No. Each Propel licence includes Salesforce platform access, and end users do not need their own Salesforce licences or Salesforce expertise.
JobBOSS²: Is it cloud based?
It is offered hosted and on premises. Hosted is not the same as a cloud native architecture, and performance expectations should be set accordingly.
Propel: Does being on Salesforce lock me in?
Practically, yes. The application, its configuration and your product data all sit in a Salesforce org, which is a real consideration at renewal.
JobBOSS²: Does it include accounting?
Yes, accounting is part of the product, which is one of the main reasons small shops choose it over an ERP plus separate finance package.
Propel: What does it cost?
Propel publishes indicative bands rather than list prices: roughly 10,000 to 150,000 US dollars a year for a small deployment and 250,000 to 500,000 for a large one, plus setup.
JobBOSS²: Can it read data from my CNC machines?
Not natively in any meaningful way. Data collection is operator driven, so shops wanting spindle level data buy a monitoring platform alongside it.
Propel: Is it suitable for regulated medical devices?
Yes, that is a core segment; the quality module covers CAPA, non-conformance, audits and training records with electronic signatures.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- JobBOSS² vs AMFG
- JobBOSS² vs Paperless Parts
- JobBOSS² vs ProShop ERP
- JobBOSS² vs Xometry
- JobBOSS² vs Yokogawa CENTUM VP
- JobBOSS² vs Prodsmart
- JobBOSS² vs PTC Windchill
- JobBOSS² vs QAD Redzone
- JobBOSS² vs SolidWorks
- JobBOSS² vs LabVIEW
- JobBOSS² vs ABB 800xA
- JobBOSS² vs AVEVA System Platform
- JobBOSS² vs Authentise
- JobBOSS² vs COPA-DATA zenon
- JobBOSS² vs Duro PLM
- JobBOSS² vs Dyndrite
- JobBOSS² vs Erbessd Instruments
- JobBOSS² vs Autodesk Netfabb
- JobBOSS² vs Arena PLM
- JobBOSS² vs Aras Innovator
- JobBOSS² vs OpenBOM
- JobBOSS² vs Materialise Magics
- JobBOSS² vs Rockwell FactoryTalk
- JobBOSS² vs Fusion 360
- JobBOSS² vs TrakSYS
- JobBOSS² vs Litmus Edge
- JobBOSS² vs Ignition
- JobBOSS² vs KCF Technologies
- JobBOSS² vs IBM Maximo Application Suite
- JobBOSS² vs SKF Enlight Centre
- Propel vs AMFG
- Propel vs Paperless Parts
- Propel vs ProShop ERP
- Propel vs Xometry
- Propel vs Yokogawa CENTUM VP
- Propel vs Prodsmart
- Propel vs PTC Windchill
- Propel vs QAD Redzone
- Propel vs SolidWorks
- Propel vs LabVIEW
- Propel vs ABB 800xA
- Propel vs AVEVA System Platform
- Propel vs Authentise
- Propel vs COPA-DATA zenon
- Propel vs Duro PLM
- Propel vs Dyndrite
- Propel vs Erbessd Instruments
- Propel vs Autodesk Netfabb
- Propel vs Arena PLM
- Propel vs Aras Innovator
- Propel vs OpenBOM
- Propel vs Materialise Magics
- Propel vs Rockwell FactoryTalk
- Propel vs Fusion 360
- Propel vs TrakSYS
- Propel vs Litmus Edge
- Propel vs Ignition
- Propel vs KCF Technologies
- Propel vs IBM Maximo Application Suite
- Propel vs SKF Enlight Centre
