Design · head to head
InVision vs Maze
The short version
- Each has a real cost: InVision service discontinued as of end of 2024; no longer available or supported; Maze maze publishes no prices on its pricing page; every plan routes to contact sales, so pricing is by quote only with no published rate or minimum
- They diverge on capability: InVision covers Interactive prototypes, Maze covers Prototype testing.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which InVision and Maze actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in InVision
- Interactive prototypes
- Design collaboration
- Freehand whiteboarding
- Design system manager
- Inspect mode
- Comments & feedback
- Version control
- User testing
Only in Maze
- Prototype testing
- Usability testing
- Card sorting
- Tree testing
- Surveys
- 5-second tests
- A/B testing
- Analytics dashboard
Both cover
- Sketch
- Slack
- Microsoft Teams
- Jira
- SOC2
- GDPR
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
InVision
- Prototype creationnot Maze
- Design feedbacknot Maze
- Whiteboarding sessionsnot Maze
- Design handoffnot Maze
- User testingnot Maze
Maze
- User research and testingnot InVision
- AI-powered moderation featuresnot InVision
- Prototype and website testingnot InVision
- User feedback panelsnot InVision
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
InVision
- Service discontinued as of end of 2024; no longer available or supported
- Workflow required constant switching between design software (Sketch/Photoshop) and InVision for prototyping, creating inefficiency
- Performance issues and glitches reported, especially with larger projects
- Limited development capabilities; required additional hosting and developer support for deployment
- Could not export working web or mobile applications without additional development
Maze
- Maze publishes no prices on its pricing page; every plan routes to contact sales, so pricing is by quote only with no published rate or minimum
- The AI study builder, AI moderated interviews and moderated interview studies are Enterprise only
- Mobile testing and testing through the Maze mobile app are Enterprise only
- Interview scheduling, card sorting and information architecture testing are Enterprise only
- Role-based access, SSO and compliance controls are Enterprise only
- Panel recruitment is available on all plans but with stated limits, and prototype testing carries limits below Enterprise
- Qualitative analysis of clip recordings, interview transcription and automated theme analysis are Enterprise only
Pricing, plan by plan
InVision
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the InVision review.
Maze
Free- FreeFree
- 1 active project
- Preview link testing
- Basic analytics
- Starter$75/month
- 3 active projects
- Unlimited responses
- Advanced analytics
- Team$150/month
- Unlimited projects
- Team collaboration
- Custom branding
- Enterprise$undefined/month
- Everything in Team
- SSO
- Dedicated CSM
Which should you pick?
Choose InVision if
- You need interactive prototypes.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Macos, Windows, Ios, Android.
- You also want design collaboration.
Choose Maze if
- You need prototype testing.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Mobile, Api.
- You also want usability testing.
Questions people ask
- Is InVision or Maze better?
- Neither clearly leads. InVision starts at Free and Maze at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, InVision or Maze?
- InVision starts at Free and Maze at Free.
- Does InVision or Maze run on more platforms?
- InVision runs on Web, Macos, Windows, Ios, Android. Maze runs on Web, Mobile, Api.
- Can I use InVision for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is InVision best used for?
- InVision is most often used for prototype creation, design feedback, whiteboarding sessions, design handoff. Of those, prototype creation and design feedback are not what Maze is typically brought in for.
- What can InVision do that Maze cannot?
- InVision covers Interactive prototypes, Design collaboration, Freehand whiteboarding, Design system manager. Maze covers Prototype testing, Usability testing, Card sorting, Tree testing. Both handle Sketch, Slack, Microsoft Teams, Jira.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
InVision: Is InVision still active and supported in 2026?
No. InVision announced discontinuation of all services by end of 2024. The platform is no longer available or supported.
SourceMaze: Does Maze offer a free trial or freemium tier?
Maze site indicates 'Try Maze for free' option, suggesting free tier or trial availability, but specific terms and limitations not stated on main page.
SourceInVision: What were InVision's core features?
InVision allowed designers to transform designs into interactive prototypes and mockups for web and mobile. It supported Craft Player for Sketch, Craft Sync for Photoshop, and preview mode in Studio, enabling design-to-prototype workflows.
SourceMaze: Can I request a custom demo if standard plans don't fit my needs?
Yes, Maze offers 'Request a demo' option, indicating willingness to discuss custom requirements and potentially custom pricing arrangements.
SourceInVision: What were InVision's pricing plans?
InVision offered Free ($0), Starter ($25/month), Professional ($99/month), and Team plans. Annual billing provided a 10% discount. Free plan included basic prototyping; paid plans added collaboration and file access.
SourceMaze: What testing capabilities does Maze include in paid plans?
Maze features AI Moderator, prototype testing, panel recruitment, and website testing capabilities across plans, but specific feature tiers and pricing not disclosed publicly.
SourceInVision: Why did InVision fail in the market?
InVision's market position was disrupted by Figma, which unified design, prototyping, and collaboration in a single web-based platform. InVision required switching between design software and prototyping, creating friction and reducing competitiveness.
SourceInVision: What integrations did InVision support?
InVision integrated with design tools like Sketch and Photoshop, and supported sharing and collaboration workflows. The platform did not support deployment or direct development integration.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- InVision vs Proto.io
- InVision vs Adobe XD
- InVision vs Framer
- InVision vs Marvel
- InVision vs Origami Studio
- InVision vs ProtoPie
- InVision vs Principle
- InVision vs Axure RP
- InVision vs Procreate
- InVision vs Krita
- InVision vs Webflow
- InVision vs Canva
- InVision vs Magnific
- InVision vs Subframe
- InVision vs Vectr
- InVision vs Figma
- InVision vs Linear
- InVision vs Asana
- InVision vs ClickUp
- InVision vs Storybook
- InVision vs Sketch
- InVision vs Postman
- InVision vs Lovable
- InVision vs Canny
- InVision vs LaunchDarkly
- InVision vs Mixpanel
- InVision vs Pendo
- InVision vs Jira
- InVision vs Mozilla Firefox
- InVision vs Redis
- InVision vs Segment
- InVision vs Supabase
- InVision vs Safari
- Maze vs Proto.io
- Maze vs Adobe XD
- Maze vs Framer
- Maze vs Marvel
- Maze vs Origami Studio
- Maze vs ProtoPie
- Maze vs Principle
- Maze vs Axure RP
- Maze vs Procreate
- Maze vs Krita
- Maze vs Webflow
- Maze vs Canva
- Maze vs Magnific
- Maze vs Subframe
- Maze vs Vectr
- Maze vs Figma
- Maze vs Linear
- Maze vs Asana
- Maze vs ClickUp
- Maze vs Storybook
- Maze vs Sketch
- Maze vs Postman
- Maze vs Lovable
- Maze vs Canny
- Maze vs LaunchDarkly
- Maze vs Mixpanel
- Maze vs Pendo
- Maze vs Jira
- Maze vs Mozilla Firefox
- Maze vs Redis
- Maze vs Segment
- Maze vs Supabase
- Maze vs Safari


