Softwr

Design · head to head

InVision vs Krita

InVision logo

InVision

Design

Digital product design platform

From
Free
Rated
-
Krita logo

Krita

Design

Free and open-source digital painting software

From
Free
Rated
-

The short version

  • Each has a real cost: InVision service discontinued as of end of 2024; no longer available or supported; Krita not portable across Windows/macOS/Linux with consistent performance
  • They diverge on capability: InVision covers Interactive prototypes, Krita covers Digital painting.
  • Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which InVision and Krita actually diverge.

Attributes where InVision and Krita differ
AttributeInVisionKrita
PlatformsWeb, Macos, Windows, Ios, AndroidWindows, macOS, Linux
Founded20111999

Identical on both: starting price (Free), pricing model (Unknown), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Design).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in InVision

  • Interactive prototypes
  • Design collaboration
  • Freehand whiteboarding
  • Design system manager
  • Inspect mode
  • Comments & feedback
  • Version control
  • User testing

Only in Krita

  • Digital painting
  • Brush engines
  • Layer management
  • Animation
  • Vector tools
  • OpenEXR
  • PSD files
  • Graphics tablets

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

InVision

  • Prototype creationnot Krita
  • Design feedbacknot Krita
  • Whiteboarding sessionsnot Krita
  • Design handoffnot Krita
  • User testingnot Krita

Krita

  • Digital paintingnot InVision
  • Concept artnot InVision
  • Character designnot InVision
  • 2D animationnot InVision
  • Texture paintingnot InVision

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

InVision

  • Service discontinued as of end of 2024; no longer available or supported
  • Workflow required constant switching between design software (Sketch/Photoshop) and InVision for prototyping, creating inefficiency
  • Performance issues and glitches reported, especially with larger projects
  • Limited development capabilities; required additional hosting and developer support for deployment
  • Could not export working web or mobile applications without additional development

Krita

  • Not portable across Windows/macOS/Linux with consistent performance
  • Performance limits on large projects with many layers compared to professional software
  • Requires system administrator privileges for installation on managed systems
  • Limited professional support compared to commercial alternatives

Pricing, plan by plan

InVision

Free

No published plan breakdown. See the InVision review.

Krita

Free

No published plan breakdown. See the Krita review.

Which should you pick?

Choose InVision if

  • You need interactive prototypes.
  • You want to start without paying.
  • You work on Web, Macos, Windows, Ios, Android.
  • You also want design collaboration.

Choose Krita if

  • You need digital painting.
  • You want to start without paying.
  • You work on Windows, macOS, Linux.
  • You also want brush engines.

Questions people ask

Is InVision or Krita better?
Neither clearly leads. InVision starts at Free and Krita at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, InVision or Krita?
InVision starts at Free and Krita at Free.
Does InVision or Krita run on more platforms?
InVision runs on Web, Macos, Windows, Ios, Android. Krita runs on Windows, macOS, Linux.
Can I use InVision for free?
Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
What is InVision best used for?
InVision is most often used for prototype creation, design feedback, whiteboarding sessions, design handoff. Of those, prototype creation and design feedback are not what Krita is typically brought in for.
What can InVision do that Krita cannot?
InVision covers Interactive prototypes, Design collaboration, Freehand whiteboarding, Design system manager. Krita covers Digital painting, Brush engines, Layer management, Animation.

Answered from the vendors’ own pages

InVision: Is InVision still active and supported in 2026?

No. InVision announced discontinuation of all services by end of 2024. The platform is no longer available or supported.

Source
Krita: Is Krita free and open source?

Yes, Krita is completely free and open source software developed by the KDE community. It is distributed under the LGPL license with no licensing fees.

Source
InVision: What were InVision's core features?

InVision allowed designers to transform designs into interactive prototypes and mockups for web and mobile. It supported Craft Player for Sketch, Craft Sync for Photoshop, and preview mode in Studio, enabling design-to-prototype workflows.

Source
Krita: What platforms does Krita support?

Krita is available for Windows, macOS, and Linux. It can be downloaded from krita.org or installed via package managers on Linux distributions.

Source
InVision: What were InVision's pricing plans?

InVision offered Free ($0), Starter ($25/month), Professional ($99/month), and Team plans. Annual billing provided a 10% discount. Free plan included basic prototyping; paid plans added collaboration and file access.

Source
Krita: What animation capabilities does Krita have?

Krita supports frame-by-frame animation with onion skin view, timeline management, and export to video formats for creating animated sequences.

Source
InVision: Why did InVision fail in the market?

InVision's market position was disrupted by Figma, which unified design, prototyping, and collaboration in a single web-based platform. InVision required switching between design software and prototyping, creating friction and reducing competitiveness.

Source
InVision: What integrations did InVision support?

InVision integrated with design tools like Sketch and Photoshop, and supported sharing and collaboration workflows. The platform did not support deployment or direct development integration.

Source
Share

Related pages

Other head to heads