Maritime · head to head
INTTRA vs Q88
The short version
- Each has a real cost: INTTRA iNTTRA's own homepage as captured by the Internet Archive on 18 January 2022 confirms it operates under E2open with a 'Learn About E2open' link on its own navigation, and pricing remains bare contact-sales with no named editions; a customer testimonial quoted on the same page (not INTTRA's own pricing) cites Bill of Lading fee savings of $25 to $75 per shipment from consolidating onto the platform; Q88 the Internet Archive's capture of Q88 LLC's corporate homepage on 19 February 2016 stated Q88.com had 75% of the world-wide tanker industry onboard and served over 1,000 clients across four named products (Q88.com, Q88Dry.com, Milbros.com, Q88VMS.com), with no price figure published for any; this is a 2016 capture and figures are dated.
- They diverge on capability: INTTRA covers Electronic booking, Q88 covers Vessel questionnaires.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which INTTRA and Q88 actually diverge.
Identical on both: free tier (No), platforms (Web, Api), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Maritime).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in INTTRA
- Electronic booking
- Container tracking
- Documentation
- Rate management
- TMS platforms
- ERP systems
- Carrier systems
Only in Q88
- Vessel questionnaires
- Vetting support
- Documentation management
- Compliance tracking
- Oil major systems
- Chartering platforms
- Fleet management
Both cover
- Web support
- Api support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
INTTRA
- Booking and managing ocean shipments across global carrier networks from central platformnot Q88
- Reducing shipping costs by 25-30% through streamlined consolidation operationsnot Q88
- Decreasing operational staffing from six to two employees per 100 shipmentsnot Q88
- Standardizing electronic data conversion and transmission faster than manual processesnot Q88
- Managing over 1.5 million container movements across 120+ countriesnot Q88
- Performing real-time regulatory compliance verification for export and import requirementsnot Q88
Q88
No use cases recorded yet. See the Q88 review.
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
INTTRA
- INTTRA's own homepage as captured by the Internet Archive on 18 January 2022 confirms it operates under E2open with a 'Learn About E2open' link on its own navigation, and pricing remains bare contact-sales with no named editions; a customer testimonial quoted on the same page (not INTTRA's own pricing) cites Bill of Lading fee savings of $25 to $75 per shipment from consolidating onto the platform
Q88
- The Internet Archive's capture of Q88 LLC's corporate homepage on 19 February 2016 stated Q88.com had 75% of the world-wide tanker industry onboard and served over 1,000 clients across four named products (Q88.com, Q88Dry.com, Milbros.com, Q88VMS.com), with no price figure published for any; this is a 2016 capture and figures are dated.
Pricing, plan by plan
INTTRA
$0.5/per-transaction- Enterprise$1000/month
- E-booking
- Tracking
- Documentation
Q88
$200/month- Vessel Manager$500/month
- Q88 questionnaires
- Vessel profiles
- Documentation
Which should you pick?
Choose INTTRA if
- You need electronic booking.
- You work on Web, Api.
- You also want container tracking.
Choose Q88 if
- You need vessel questionnaires.
- You work on Web, Api.
- You also want vetting support.
Questions people ask
- Is INTTRA or Q88 better?
- Neither clearly leads. INTTRA starts at $0.5/per-transaction and Q88 at $200/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, INTTRA or Q88?
- INTTRA starts at $0.5/per-transaction and Q88 at $200/month.
- Does INTTRA or Q88 run on more platforms?
- Both run on Web, Api, so platform support will not decide this one for you.
- What is INTTRA best used for?
- INTTRA is most often used for booking and managing ocean shipments across global carrier networks from central platform, reducing shipping costs by 25-30% through streamlined consolidation operations, decreasing operational staffing from six to two employees per 100 shipments, standardizing electronic data conversion and transmission faster than manual processes. Of those, booking and managing ocean shipments across global carrier networks from central platform and reducing shipping costs by 25-30% through streamlined consolidation operations are not what Q88 is typically brought in for.
- What can INTTRA do that Q88 cannot?
- INTTRA covers Electronic booking, Container tracking, Documentation, Rate management. Q88 covers Vessel questionnaires, Vetting support, Documentation management, Compliance tracking. Both handle Web support, Api support.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
INTTRA: How much can INTTRA help reduce ocean shipping costs?
INTTRA users report 25-30% cost reductions through operational efficiency, with some achieving savings of $25-$75 per Bill of Lading through the consolidation platform.
SourceINTTRA: Can INTTRA help with regulatory compliance for international shipments?
Yes, INTTRA provides real-time verification of changing export and import regulations, helping organizations like Etihad Airways manage constantly evolving international shipping requirements.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- INTTRA vs MarineTraffic
- INTTRA vs Flexport
- INTTRA vs Kongsberg Maritime
- INTTRA vs ChartCo
- INTTRA vs Sea Machines
- INTTRA vs Sea-Intelligence
- INTTRA vs CargoSmart
- INTTRA vs Vizion
- INTTRA vs project44
- INTTRA vs Freightos
- INTTRA vs FourKites
- INTTRA vs Sofar Ocean
- INTTRA vs Voyager Worldwide
- INTTRA vs Wartsila Fleet Operations Solution
- INTTRA vs ZeroNorth
- INTTRA vs Windward
- INTTRA vs DNV Maritime
- INTTRA vs DNV Navigator Port
- INTTRA vs NAVTOR
- INTTRA vs Pole Star Global
- INTTRA vs Kpler
- INTTRA vs Helm Operations
- INTTRA vs Navis N4
- INTTRA vs ShipNet
- INTTRA vs SpeedyDock
- INTTRA vs Danaos
- Q88 vs MarineTraffic
- Q88 vs Flexport
- Q88 vs Kongsberg Maritime
- Q88 vs ChartCo
- Q88 vs Sea Machines
- Q88 vs Sea-Intelligence
- Q88 vs CargoSmart
- Q88 vs Vizion
- Q88 vs project44
- Q88 vs Freightos
- Q88 vs FourKites
- Q88 vs Sofar Ocean
- Q88 vs Voyager Worldwide
- Q88 vs Wartsila Fleet Operations Solution
- Q88 vs ZeroNorth
- Q88 vs Windward
- Q88 vs DNV Maritime
- Q88 vs DNV Navigator Port
- Q88 vs NAVTOR
- Q88 vs Pole Star Global
- Q88 vs Kpler
- Q88 vs Helm Operations
- Q88 vs Navis N4
- Q88 vs ShipNet
- Q88 vs SpeedyDock
- Q88 vs Danaos


