Maps · head to head
Kepler.gl vs Leica Infinity

Kepler.gl
Maps
Powerful open-source geospatial analysis tool for large-scale datasets, enabling beautiful data visualizations without coding
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Leica Infinity
Maps
Office software that combines total station, GNSS, level, UAV and scanner data into one survey project
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Kepler.gl kepler.gl is a free open source library with no vendor-sold edition; confirmed by the absence of any App Store, marketplace or G-Cloud listing, support is limited to community GitHub issues rather than a purchased SLA.; Leica Infinity leica publishes no pricing at all and sells through dealers, so identical firms in different regions pay different rates for the same modules and cannot benchmark a quote.
- They diverge on capability: Kepler.gl covers Core Functionality, Leica Infinity covers Multi-sensor project.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Kepler.gl and Leica Infinity actually diverge.
| Attribute | Kepler.gl | Leica Infinity |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | freemium | quote |
| Platforms | Web | Windows |
Identical on both: starting price (On request), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Maps).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Kepler.gl
- Core Functionality
- User Interface
Only in Leica Infinity
- Multi-sensor project
- Network adjustment
- GNSS baseline processing
- Point cloud handling
- Surface and volume
- Field data exchange
- Imaging and UAV workflow
- CAD, GIS and BIM export
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Kepler.gl
No use cases recorded yet. See the Kepler.gl review.
Leica Infinity
- A survey practice running Leica instruments that wants control adjustment, GNSS post-processing and scan registration in one project rather than three packagesnot Kepler.gl
- A contractor computing monthly earthworks volumes from drone and GNSS data measured against a design surface for payment applicationsnot Kepler.gl
- A monitoring job comparing repeated survey epochs of a structure or slope where the adjustment history and residuals must be defensiblenot Kepler.gl
- An office preparing stakeout data and control for field crews on Leica Captivate and receiving as-built observations back into the same projectnot Kepler.gl
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Kepler.gl
- Kepler.gl is a free open source library with no vendor-sold edition; confirmed by the absence of any App Store, marketplace or G-Cloud listing, support is limited to community GitHub issues rather than a purchased SLA.
Leica Infinity
- Leica publishes no pricing at all and sells through dealers, so identical firms in different regions pay different rates for the same modules and cannot benchmark a quote.
- It is modular, which means the advertised capability list is not what you get: sensor and processing modules are licensed separately and the useful configuration costs considerably more than the entry one.
- Third-party instrument data is supported but always second-class; a mixed Leica and Trimble fleet will have one manufacturer’s raw data going through a lossier import path.
- Windows only, with no macOS, Linux or browser option, which is a hard constraint for organisations moving field and office work to tablets or cloud desktops.
- Perpetual licences require an ongoing customer care contract to receive updates and support, so the perpetual option saves less over five years than it first appears.
Pricing, plan by plan
Kepler.gl
On requestNo published plan breakdown. See the Kepler.gl review.
Leica Infinity
On request- Infinity perpetual licence$undefined/year
- Bought once, owned outright
- Modular by sensor and processing capability
- Annual customer care contract needed for updates
- Infinity subscription$undefined/year
- Annual or multi-year term
- Includes updates for the term
- Modules added or removed at renewal
Which should you pick?
Choose Leica Infinity if
- You need multi-sensor project.
- You work on Windows.
- You also want network adjustment.
Questions people ask
- Is Kepler.gl or Leica Infinity better?
- Neither clearly leads. Kepler.gl starts at On request and Leica Infinity at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Kepler.gl or Leica Infinity?
- Kepler.gl starts at On request and Leica Infinity at On request.
- Does Kepler.gl or Leica Infinity run on more platforms?
- Kepler.gl runs on Web. Leica Infinity runs on Windows.
- What can Kepler.gl do that Leica Infinity cannot?
- Kepler.gl covers Core Functionality, User Interface. Leica Infinity covers Multi-sensor project, Network adjustment, GNSS baseline processing, Point cloud handling.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Leica Infinity: Is Leica Infinity available as a perpetual licence?
Yes. Leica sells Infinity both as a subscription and as a perpetual licence, though updates on a perpetual licence require an active customer care contract.
Leica Infinity: How much does it cost?
Leica does not publish prices. Infinity is quoted per module through authorised dealers.
Leica Infinity: Does it work with non-Leica instruments?
It imports common third-party and standard formats, but Leica raw data is the first-class path. Expect reduced fidelity with competing raw formats.
Leica Infinity: Is there a free version?
No, only a 30-day trial.
Leica Infinity: Does it replace Cyclone for scanning?
No. Infinity handles scan data in a survey context; heavy registration and modelling work still belongs in Leica Cyclone.
Related pages
More on Leica Infinity
Other head to heads
- Kepler.gl vs Fused
- Kepler.gl vs Mapbox
- Kepler.gl vs Google Maps Platform
- Kepler.gl vs HERE Technologies
- Kepler.gl vs Apple Maps
- Kepler.gl vs deck.gl
- Kepler.gl vs QGIS
- Kepler.gl vs Cesium ion
- Kepler.gl vs GRASS GIS
- Kepler.gl vs WhiteboxTools
- Kepler.gl vs Foursquare Spatial Studio
- Kepler.gl vs Lonboard
- Kepler.gl vs Atlas.co
- Kepler.gl vs Geographic Calculator
- Kepler.gl vs Correlator3D
- Kepler.gl vs Emlid Studio
- Kepler.gl vs ArcGIS Field Maps
- Kepler.gl vs Felt
- Kepler.gl vs Global Mapper
- Kepler.gl vs SW Maps
- Kepler.gl vs Agisoft Metashape
- Kepler.gl vs Potree
- Kepler.gl vs Polaris Navigation GPS
- Kepler.gl vs Trailforks
- Kepler.gl vs ArcGIS Survey123
- Kepler.gl vs onX Maps
- Kepler.gl vs Navmii GPS
- Kepler.gl vs Nominatim
- Kepler.gl vs OpenLayers
- Kepler.gl vs OpenRouteService
- Kepler.gl vs OpenStreetMap
- Kepler.gl vs OsmAnd
- Leica Infinity vs Fused
- Leica Infinity vs Mapbox
- Leica Infinity vs Google Maps Platform
- Leica Infinity vs HERE Technologies
- Leica Infinity vs Apple Maps
- Leica Infinity vs deck.gl
- Leica Infinity vs QGIS
- Leica Infinity vs Cesium ion
- Leica Infinity vs GRASS GIS
- Leica Infinity vs WhiteboxTools
- Leica Infinity vs Foursquare Spatial Studio
- Leica Infinity vs Lonboard
- Leica Infinity vs Atlas.co
- Leica Infinity vs Geographic Calculator
- Leica Infinity vs Correlator3D
- Leica Infinity vs Emlid Studio
- Leica Infinity vs ArcGIS Field Maps
- Leica Infinity vs Felt
- Leica Infinity vs Global Mapper
- Leica Infinity vs SW Maps
- Leica Infinity vs Agisoft Metashape
- Leica Infinity vs Potree
- Leica Infinity vs Polaris Navigation GPS
- Leica Infinity vs Trailforks
- Leica Infinity vs ArcGIS Survey123
- Leica Infinity vs onX Maps
- Leica Infinity vs Navmii GPS
- Leica Infinity vs Nominatim
- Leica Infinity vs OpenLayers
- Leica Infinity vs OpenRouteService
- Leica Infinity vs OpenStreetMap
- Leica Infinity vs OsmAnd
