Government · head to head
Incode vs Proofpoint

Incode
Government
Financial & HR Software for Government
- From
- $700/month
- Free plan
- No

Proofpoint
Cybersecurity
Email security and data protection suite from a private company owned by Thoma Bravo, licensed per user with modules sold separately.
- From
- $6/month
- Free plan
- No
The short version
- Incode starts at $700/mo, Proofpoint at $6/mo.
- Only Incode lists general Ledger; only Proofpoint lists inline secure email gateway.
- Where Incode falls short: Incode is now sold as Tyler ERP Pro and tylertech.com/products/incode redirects to the ERP Pro product page.
- Prices and features on this page were last checked on 13 November 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Incode and Proofpoint actually diverge.
| Attribute | Incode | Proofpoint |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $700/month | $6/month |
| Platforms | Web, Windows, macOS | Email, Web |
| Category | Government | Cybersecurity |
| Founded | 1966 | 2002 |
Identical on both: pricing model (Subscription), free tier (No).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Incode
- General Ledger
- Accounts Payable
- Payroll Management
- Utility Billing
- Budget Management
- Bank Integrations
- ADP
- Third-party Payroll
Only in Proofpoint
- Inline secure email gateway
- Attachment sandboxing
- URL rewriting and click-time analysis
- Threat Response Auto-Pull
- Email Fraud Defense
- Security awareness training
- Insider Threat Management
- Enterprise DLP
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Incode
- Financial management and ERP for small and mid-sized local governmentsnot Proofpoint
- Utility billing, payroll and human resources for city and county administrationnot Proofpoint
- Court and public safety records for municipalitiesnot Proofpoint
Proofpoint
- A regulated organisation that needs a filtering layer, DMARC enforcement and archiving with an auditable trail across all threenot Incode
- An organisation that suffered a business email compromise and must show its board a control that stops delivery rather than remediating afterwardsnot Incode
- Concentrating stronger controls and training on the specific individuals who actually receive targeted attacks rather than applying uniform policynot Incode
- Retracting a phishing message from thousands of mailboxes after the verdict changes, including copies that were forwarded internallynot Incode
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Incode
- Incode is now sold as Tyler ERP Pro and tylertech.com/products/incode redirects to the ERP Pro product page
- No pricing is published; Tyler routes all enquiries through contact and demo requests with no published rate, minimum or cost driver
- The product is sold only to public sector organisations
Proofpoint
- Licensing is per user per year with each capability as a separate stock item, so the platform shown in a proof of concept is normally several products, and adding awareness training, data loss prevention or insider threat monitoring later is a fresh negotiation rather than enabling a feature
- It sits inline with MX records pointed at it, so any service degradation is a mail outage for the entire organisation, and both migrating on and migrating off are cutovers with queueing, rollback planning and a real risk of message loss
- Most customers on Microsoft 365 E5 or Google Workspace Enterprise are already paying for native filtering, so Proofpoint is a second licence layered over a capability the organisation owns, and that comparison is raised by finance at every single renewal
- The administration console carries a decade of acquisitions: the classic gateway policy routes and filters do not share a model with the newer module interfaces, rule evaluation is order-sensitive in ways that surprise untrained administrators, and mistakes there silently change what is delivered
- Quarantine management is a standing helpdesk workload because legitimate bulk mail, invoices and supplier notifications are held, and unless end-user digests are configured and users are taught to use them, the security team becomes the mail release desk
Pricing, plan by plan
Incode
$700/month- Municipal Suite$700/mo
- Financial Management
- HR/Payroll
- Utility Billing
Proofpoint
$6/month- Email Protection$6/mo
- Per user
- Advanced threat detection
- Data loss prevention
- Compliance$8/mo
- All Email Protection
- Archive & search
- eDiscovery
- Advanced Threat$10/mo
- All Compliance features
- Targeted attack detection
- Behavior analytics
Which should you pick?
Choose Incode if
- You need general ledger.
- You work on Web, Windows, macOS.
- You also want accounts payable.
Choose Proofpoint if
- You need inline secure email gateway.
- You work on Email, Web.
- You also want attachment sandboxing.
Questions people ask
- Is Incode or Proofpoint better?
- Neither clearly leads. Incode starts at $700/month and Proofpoint at $6/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Incode or Proofpoint?
- Incode starts at $700/month and Proofpoint at $6/month.
- Does Incode or Proofpoint run on more platforms?
- Incode runs on Web, Windows, macOS. Proofpoint runs on Email, Web.
- What is Incode best used for?
- Incode is most often used for financial management and erp for small and mid-sized local governments, utility billing, payroll and human resources for city and county administration, court and public safety records for municipalities. Of those, financial management and erp for small and mid-sized local governments and utility billing, payroll and human resources for city and county administration are not what Proofpoint is typically brought in for.
- What can Incode do that Proofpoint cannot?
- Incode covers General Ledger, Accounts Payable, Payroll Management, Utility Billing. Proofpoint covers Inline secure email gateway, Attachment sandboxing, URL rewriting and click-time analysis, Threat Response Auto-Pull.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Proofpoint: Does it replace Microsoft Defender for Office 365?
Functionally it overlaps heavily, and running both means paying twice for filtering. Most Proofpoint customers on Microsoft 365 keep Defender licensed because it is bundled in E5 and use Proofpoint as the inline gateway. Expect to justify that duplication annually.
Proofpoint: Who owns Proofpoint?
Thoma Bravo, a private equity firm, which took the company private in 2021. It has continued to acquire since, including Tessian, Normalyze and Hornetsecurity, which is why the portfolio spans so many adjacent categories.
Proofpoint: Do I have to change my MX records?
For the gateway, yes. That is what makes it inline and able to block before delivery. Some newer capabilities integrate through the mailbox API instead, but the core protection model is MX-level.
Proofpoint: Is security awareness training included?
No, it is a separate subscription. It integrates well with the threat data, so training can target the users actually being attacked, but it is a distinct line item on the quote.
Proofpoint: What does Threat Response Auto-Pull actually do?
It removes messages from mailboxes after delivery when the verdict changes, including copies that users forwarded internally. It is the answer to the case where a link was clean at delivery and weaponised an hour later.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Incode vs Workday Government
- Incode vs Springbrook Software
- Incode vs SAP for Government
- Incode vs CivicPlus Asset Management
- Incode vs Mapbox Government
- Incode vs OpenCities
- Incode vs Granicus
- Incode vs CentralSquare
- Incode vs Axon Records
- Incode vs ClearGov
- Incode vs AWS GovCloud
- Incode vs Google Cloud for Government
- Incode vs GovPilot
- Incode vs IAPro
- Incode vs iCompass
- Incode vs Mark43
- Incode vs CivicPlus
- Incode vs GovQA
- Incode vs Trend Micro Vision One
- Incode vs Mimecast
- Incode vs Qualys VMDR
- Incode vs Zscaler Internet Access
- Incode vs IBM QRadar
- Incode vs Varonis Data Security Platform
- Incode vs VMware Carbon Black
- Incode vs Sysdig
- Incode vs Fortinet FortiGate
- Incode vs Recorded Future
- Incode vs SentinelOne
- Incode vs Unit21
- Incode vs Veracode
- Incode vs Very Good Security
- Incode vs VIVOTEK VAST Security Station
- Incode vs Windscribe
- Incode vs Yoti
- Incode vs SentinelOne Singularity
- Proofpoint vs Workday Government
- Proofpoint vs Springbrook Software
- Proofpoint vs SAP for Government
- Proofpoint vs CivicPlus Asset Management
- Proofpoint vs Mapbox Government
- Proofpoint vs OpenCities
- Proofpoint vs Granicus
- Proofpoint vs CentralSquare
- Proofpoint vs Axon Records
- Proofpoint vs ClearGov
- Proofpoint vs AWS GovCloud
- Proofpoint vs Google Cloud for Government
- Proofpoint vs GovPilot
- Proofpoint vs IAPro
- Proofpoint vs iCompass
- Proofpoint vs Mark43
- Proofpoint vs CivicPlus
- Proofpoint vs GovQA
- Proofpoint vs Trend Micro Vision One
- Proofpoint vs Mimecast
- Proofpoint vs Qualys VMDR
- Proofpoint vs Zscaler Internet Access
- Proofpoint vs IBM QRadar
- Proofpoint vs Varonis Data Security Platform
- Proofpoint vs VMware Carbon Black
- Proofpoint vs Sysdig
- Proofpoint vs Fortinet FortiGate
- Proofpoint vs Recorded Future
- Proofpoint vs SentinelOne
- Proofpoint vs Unit21
- Proofpoint vs Veracode
- Proofpoint vs Very Good Security
- Proofpoint vs VIVOTEK VAST Security Station
- Proofpoint vs Windscribe
- Proofpoint vs Yoti
- Proofpoint vs SentinelOne Singularity
