Cybersecurity · head to head
Proofpoint vs Very Good Security

Proofpoint
Cybersecurity
Email security and data protection suite from a private company owned by Thoma Bravo, licensed per user with modules sold separately.
- From
- $6/month
- Rated
- -

Very Good Security
Cybersecurity
Tokenisation proxy that keeps card and personal data out of your own systems and out of PCI scope
- From
- $1000/month
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Proofpoint licensing is per user per year with each capability as a separate stock item, so the platform shown in a proof of concept is normally several products, and adding awareness training, data loss prevention or insider threat monitoring later is a fresh negotiation rather than enabling a feature.; Very Good Security vGS sits in the live path of every request carrying sensitive data, so its latency and availability become yours, and an outage in the proxy is a payment outage no matter how healthy your own systems are.
- They diverge on capability: Proofpoint covers Inline secure email gateway, Very Good Security covers Aliasing proxy.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Proofpoint and Very Good Security actually diverge.
| Attribute | Proofpoint | Very Good Security |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $6/month | $1000/month |
| Pricing model | subscription | Per month |
| Platforms | Email, Cloud, Web | Web, API |
| Founded | 2002 | Unknown |
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cybersecurity).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Proofpoint
- Inline secure email gateway
- Attachment sandboxing
- URL rewriting and click-time analysis
- Threat Response Auto-Pull
- Email Fraud Defense
- Security awareness training
- Insider Threat Management
- Enterprise DLP
Only in Very Good Security
- Aliasing proxy
- PCI scope reduction
- Network tokenisation
- Processor optionality
- Card issuing data
- Vault and access controls
- Data residency options
- Compliance artefacts
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Proofpoint
- A regulated organisation that needs a filtering layer, DMARC enforcement and archiving with an auditable trail across all threenot Very Good Security
- An organisation that suffered a business email compromise and must show its board a control that stops delivery rather than remediating afterwardsnot Very Good Security
- Concentrating stronger controls and training on the specific individuals who actually receive targeted attacks rather than applying uniform policynot Very Good Security
- Retracting a phishing message from thousands of mailboxes after the verdict changes, including copies that were forwarded internallynot Very Good Security
Very Good Security
- A marketplace facing its first PCI DSS Level 1 assessment that wants to keep card data off its own estate rather than harden a dozen servicesnot Proofpoint
- A merchant negotiating with a second acquirer that needs card credentials portable so the negotiation is real rather than theoreticalnot Proofpoint
- A fintech collecting bank account and identity documents that wants sensitive fields absent from logs, backups and analytics warehouses by constructionnot Proofpoint
- A card issuer that must display a full PAN in its own mobile app without the app or its backend touching cardholder datanot Proofpoint
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Proofpoint
- Licensing is per user per year with each capability as a separate stock item, so the platform shown in a proof of concept is normally several products, and adding awareness training, data loss prevention or insider threat monitoring later is a fresh negotiation rather than enabling a feature.
- It sits inline with MX records pointed at it, so any service degradation is a mail outage for the entire organisation, and both migrating on and migrating off are cutovers with queueing, rollback planning and a real risk of message loss.
- Most customers on Microsoft 365 E5 or Google Workspace Enterprise are already paying for native filtering, so Proofpoint is a second licence layered over a capability the organisation owns, and that comparison is raised by finance at every single renewal.
- The administration console carries a decade of acquisitions: the classic gateway policy routes and filters do not share a model with the newer module interfaces, rule evaluation is order-sensitive in ways that surprise untrained administrators, and mistakes there silently change what is delivered.
- Quarantine management is a standing helpdesk workload because legitimate bulk mail, invoices and supplier notifications are held, and unless end-user digests are configured and users are taught to use them, the security team becomes the mail release desk.
Very Good Security
- VGS sits in the live path of every request carrying sensitive data, so its latency and availability become yours, and an outage in the proxy is a payment outage no matter how healthy your own systems are.
- Token portability is the whole selling point yet leaving VGS means migrating tokens back out, a project the vendor has no incentive to streamline, so the lock-in you removed from your acquirer partly moves to VGS.
- Entry pricing at around one thousand US dollars a month is real money for a pre-revenue fintech, and it buys volume-limited throughput, so cost scales with exactly the growth that made you buy it.
- Scope reduction is not scope elimination: your QSA still assesses how you integrate, and teams regularly discover that a support tool or an internal admin screen pulled plaintext back in and dragged systems into scope again.
- Proxy-based interception constrains how you design request flows, and non-standard payloads, streaming uploads or binary formats often need custom routing rules that make debugging production issues noticeably harder.
Pricing, plan by plan
Proofpoint
$6/month- Email Protection$6/month
- Per user
- Advanced threat detection
- Data loss prevention
- Compliance$8/month
- All Email Protection
- Archive & search
- eDiscovery
- Advanced Threat$10/month
- All Compliance features
- Targeted attack detection
- Behavior analytics
Very Good Security
$1000/month- Starter$1000/month
- Aliasing proxy
- Vault storage
- PCI scope reduction
- Growth$undefined/month
- Network tokenisation
- Multiple processors
- Data residency options
- Enterprise$undefined/year
- Custom vault architecture
- Dedicated support and SLA
- Contractual compliance coverage
Which should you pick?
Choose Proofpoint if
- You need inline secure email gateway.
- You work on Email, Cloud, Web.
- You also want attachment sandboxing.
Choose Very Good Security if
- You need aliasing proxy.
- You work on Web, API.
- You also want pci scope reduction.
Questions people ask
- Is Proofpoint or Very Good Security better?
- Neither clearly leads. Proofpoint starts at $6/month and Very Good Security at $1000/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Proofpoint or Very Good Security?
- Proofpoint starts at $6/month and Very Good Security at $1000/month.
- Does Proofpoint or Very Good Security run on more platforms?
- Proofpoint runs on Email, Cloud, Web. Very Good Security runs on Web, API.
- What is Proofpoint best used for?
- Proofpoint is most often used for a regulated organisation that needs a filtering layer, dmarc enforcement and archiving with an auditable trail across all three, an organisation that suffered a business email compromise and must show its board a control that stops delivery rather than remediating afterwards, concentrating stronger controls and training on the specific individuals who actually receive targeted attacks rather than applying uniform policy, retracting a phishing message from thousands of mailboxes after the verdict changes, including copies that were forwarded internally. Of those, a regulated organisation that needs a filtering layer, dmarc enforcement and archiving with an auditable trail across all three and an organisation that suffered a business email compromise and must show its board a control that stops delivery rather than remediating afterwards are not what Very Good Security is typically brought in for.
- What can Proofpoint do that Very Good Security cannot?
- Proofpoint covers Inline secure email gateway, Attachment sandboxing, URL rewriting and click-time analysis, Threat Response Auto-Pull. Very Good Security covers Aliasing proxy, PCI scope reduction, Network tokenisation, Processor optionality.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Proofpoint: Does it replace Microsoft Defender for Office 365?
Functionally it overlaps heavily, and running both means paying twice for filtering. Most Proofpoint customers on Microsoft 365 keep Defender licensed because it is bundled in E5 and use Proofpoint as the inline gateway. Expect to justify that duplication annually.
Very Good Security: Does VGS make me PCI compliant?
No. It removes cardholder data from your systems so your assessment covers a far smaller boundary, but you still complete an assessment and your integration is part of it.
Proofpoint: Who owns Proofpoint?
Thoma Bravo, a private equity firm, which took the company private in 2021. It has continued to acquire since, including Tessian, Normalyze and Hornetsecurity, which is why the portfolio spans so many adjacent categories.
Very Good Security: Can I move to another processor without re-collecting cards?
Yes, that is a core reason people buy it. The vault reveals stored credentials to whichever processor you route to.
Proofpoint: Do I have to change my MX records?
For the gateway, yes. That is what makes it inline and able to block before delivery. Some newer capabilities integrate through the mailbox API instead, but the core protection model is MX-level.
Very Good Security: What does it cost?
Published entry pricing is about one thousand US dollars per month; growth and enterprise tiers are quoted.
Proofpoint: Is security awareness training included?
No, it is a separate subscription. It integrates well with the threat data, so training can target the users actually being attacked, but it is a distinct line item on the quote.
Very Good Security: Is it only for card data?
No. The proxy handles any sensitive field, including bank details, national identifiers and documents, though payments is where the product is now focused.
Proofpoint: What does Threat Response Auto-Pull actually do?
It removes messages from mailboxes after delivery when the verdict changes, including copies that users forwarded internally. It is the answer to the case where a link was clean at delivery and weaponised an hour later.
Related pages
More on Very Good Security
Other head to heads
- Proofpoint vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Proofpoint vs Norton 360
- Proofpoint vs 1Password
- Proofpoint vs LastPass
- Proofpoint vs Trend Micro Vision One
- Proofpoint vs Mimecast
- Proofpoint vs Qualys VMDR
- Proofpoint vs Zscaler Internet Access
- Proofpoint vs IBM QRadar
- Proofpoint vs Varonis Data Security Platform
- Proofpoint vs VMware Carbon Black
- Proofpoint vs Sysdig
- Proofpoint vs Dahua Technology
- Proofpoint vs Descope
- Proofpoint vs Drata
- Proofpoint vs DTiQ
- Proofpoint vs ESET NOD32 Antivirus
- Proofpoint vs ExpressVPN
- Proofpoint vs Baffle
- Proofpoint vs HashiCorp Vault
- Proofpoint vs Feedzai
- Proofpoint vs Securiti
- Proofpoint vs Featurespace ARIC Risk Hub
- Proofpoint vs DataGrail
- Proofpoint vs Transcend
- Proofpoint vs Doppler
- Proofpoint vs Tuta
- Proofpoint vs Delinea
- Proofpoint vs Envysion
- Proofpoint vs Frontegg
- Proofpoint vs HashiCorp Boundary
- Very Good Security vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Very Good Security vs Norton 360
- Very Good Security vs 1Password
- Very Good Security vs LastPass
- Very Good Security vs Trend Micro Vision One
- Very Good Security vs Mimecast
- Very Good Security vs Qualys VMDR
- Very Good Security vs Zscaler Internet Access
- Very Good Security vs IBM QRadar
- Very Good Security vs Varonis Data Security Platform
- Very Good Security vs VMware Carbon Black
- Very Good Security vs Sysdig
- Very Good Security vs Dahua Technology
- Very Good Security vs Descope
- Very Good Security vs Drata
- Very Good Security vs DTiQ
- Very Good Security vs ESET NOD32 Antivirus
- Very Good Security vs ExpressVPN
- Very Good Security vs Baffle
- Very Good Security vs HashiCorp Vault
- Very Good Security vs Feedzai
- Very Good Security vs Securiti
- Very Good Security vs Featurespace ARIC Risk Hub
- Very Good Security vs DataGrail
- Very Good Security vs Transcend
- Very Good Security vs Doppler
- Very Good Security vs Tuta
- Very Good Security vs Delinea
- Very Good Security vs Envysion
- Very Good Security vs Frontegg
- Very Good Security vs HashiCorp Boundary
