Government · head to head
Mark43 vs Proofpoint

Proofpoint
Cybersecurity
Email security and data protection suite from a private company owned by Thoma Bravo, licensed per user with modules sold separately.
- From
- $6/month
- Free plan
- No
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Mark43 no published pricing on homepage; sales contact required for all cost details; Proofpoint licensing is per user per year with each capability as a separate stock item, so the platform shown in a proof of concept is normally several products, and adding awareness training, data loss prevention or insider threat monitoring later is a fresh negotiation rather than enabling a feature.
- They diverge on capability: Mark43 covers Computer-Aided Dispatch, Proofpoint covers Inline secure email gateway.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Mark43 and Proofpoint actually diverge.
| Attribute | Mark43 | Proofpoint |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $2000/month | $6/month |
| Platforms | Web, Ios, Android | Email, Cloud, Web |
| Category | Government | Cybersecurity |
| Founded | 2012 | 2002 |
Identical on both: pricing model (subscription), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Mark43
- Computer-Aided Dispatch
- Records Management
- Evidence Management
- Analytics
- Mobile
- FBI CJIS
- NCIC
- State Systems
Only in Proofpoint
- Inline secure email gateway
- Attachment sandboxing
- URL rewriting and click-time analysis
- Threat Response Auto-Pull
- Email Fraud Defense
- Security awareness training
- Insider Threat Management
- Enterprise DLP
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Mark43
- Citizen Servicesnot Proofpoint
- Records Managementnot Proofpoint
- Public Safetynot Proofpoint
- Civic Engagementnot Proofpoint
Proofpoint
- A regulated organisation that needs a filtering layer, DMARC enforcement and archiving with an auditable trail across all threenot Mark43
- An organisation that suffered a business email compromise and must show its board a control that stops delivery rather than remediating afterwardsnot Mark43
- Concentrating stronger controls and training on the specific individuals who actually receive targeted attacks rather than applying uniform policynot Mark43
- Retracting a phishing message from thousands of mailboxes after the verdict changes, including copies that were forwarded internallynot Mark43
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Mark43
- No published pricing on homepage; sales contact required for all cost details
- Only reference to pricing is 'early bird pricing' for 2027 conference registration
- No transparent pricing structure visible for public evaluation
Proofpoint
- Licensing is per user per year with each capability as a separate stock item, so the platform shown in a proof of concept is normally several products, and adding awareness training, data loss prevention or insider threat monitoring later is a fresh negotiation rather than enabling a feature.
- It sits inline with MX records pointed at it, so any service degradation is a mail outage for the entire organisation, and both migrating on and migrating off are cutovers with queueing, rollback planning and a real risk of message loss.
- Most customers on Microsoft 365 E5 or Google Workspace Enterprise are already paying for native filtering, so Proofpoint is a second licence layered over a capability the organisation owns, and that comparison is raised by finance at every single renewal.
- The administration console carries a decade of acquisitions: the classic gateway policy routes and filters do not share a model with the newer module interfaces, rule evaluation is order-sensitive in ways that surprise untrained administrators, and mistakes there silently change what is delivered.
- Quarantine management is a standing helpdesk workload because legitimate bulk mail, invoices and supplier notifications are held, and unless end-user digests are configured and users are taught to use them, the security team becomes the mail release desk.
Pricing, plan by plan
Mark43
$2000/month- Public Safety Suite$2000/month
- CAD
- RMS
- Analytics
Proofpoint
$6/month- Email Protection$6/month
- Per user
- Advanced threat detection
- Data loss prevention
- Compliance$8/month
- All Email Protection
- Archive & search
- eDiscovery
- Advanced Threat$10/month
- All Compliance features
- Targeted attack detection
- Behavior analytics
Which should you pick?
Choose Mark43 if
- You need computer-aided dispatch.
- You work on Web, Ios, Android.
- You also want records management.
Choose Proofpoint if
- You need inline secure email gateway.
- You work on Email, Cloud, Web.
- You also want attachment sandboxing.
Questions people ask
- Is Mark43 or Proofpoint better?
- Neither clearly leads. Mark43 starts at $2000/month and Proofpoint at $6/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Mark43 or Proofpoint?
- Mark43 starts at $2000/month and Proofpoint at $6/month.
- Does Mark43 or Proofpoint run on more platforms?
- Mark43 runs on Web, Ios, Android. Proofpoint runs on Email, Cloud, Web.
- What is Mark43 best used for?
- Mark43 is most often used for citizen services, records management, public safety, civic engagement. Of those, citizen services and records management are not what Proofpoint is typically brought in for.
- What can Mark43 do that Proofpoint cannot?
- Mark43 covers Computer-Aided Dispatch, Records Management, Evidence Management, Analytics. Proofpoint covers Inline secure email gateway, Attachment sandboxing, URL rewriting and click-time analysis, Threat Response Auto-Pull.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Mark43: Does Mark43 publish pricing online?
No, Mark43 pricing is not published on the public website. The only pricing reference is early bird conference registration. Prospective customers must contact Mark43 through 'Book A Demo' or 'Let's Connect' for pricing consultation.
SourceProofpoint: Does it replace Microsoft Defender for Office 365?
Functionally it overlaps heavily, and running both means paying twice for filtering. Most Proofpoint customers on Microsoft 365 keep Defender licensed because it is bundled in E5 and use Proofpoint as the inline gateway. Expect to justify that duplication annually.
Mark43: What payment methods or financing options does Mark43 offer?
No information about payment methods or financing options is disclosed on the public homepage. Pricing and payment details are handled through direct sales consultations.
SourceProofpoint: Who owns Proofpoint?
Thoma Bravo, a private equity firm, which took the company private in 2021. It has continued to acquire since, including Tessian, Normalyze and Hornetsecurity, which is why the portfolio spans so many adjacent categories.
Mark43: Are there volume discounts or specialized pricing for different agency sizes?
Mark43 website does not disclose any volume pricing, per-user costs, or specialized rates for agencies of different sizes. All pricing inquiries require direct contact with sales team.
SourceProofpoint: Do I have to change my MX records?
For the gateway, yes. That is what makes it inline and able to block before delivery. Some newer capabilities integrate through the mailbox API instead, but the core protection model is MX-level.
Proofpoint: Is security awareness training included?
No, it is a separate subscription. It integrates well with the threat data, so training can target the users actually being attacked, but it is a distinct line item on the quote.
Proofpoint: What does Threat Response Auto-Pull actually do?
It removes messages from mailboxes after delivery when the verdict changes, including copies that users forwarded internally. It is the answer to the case where a link was clean at delivery and weaponised an hour later.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Mark43 vs Accela
- Mark43 vs CivicPlus
- Mark43 vs Granicus
- Mark43 vs DocuWare
- Mark43 vs CentralSquare
- Mark43 vs Tyler Brazos
- Mark43 vs Axon Records
- Mark43 vs Ring Neighbors
- Mark43 vs SafeCity
- Mark43 vs Vigilant Solutions
- Mark43 vs Citizen
- Mark43 vs IAPro
- Mark43 vs CitizenLab
- Mark43 vs ClearGov
- Mark43 vs DemandStar
- Mark43 vs eCode360
- Mark43 vs MyRec.com
- Mark43 vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Mark43 vs Norton 360
- Mark43 vs 1Password
- Mark43 vs LastPass
- Mark43 vs Trend Micro Vision One
- Mark43 vs Mimecast
- Mark43 vs Qualys VMDR
- Mark43 vs Zscaler Internet Access
- Mark43 vs IBM QRadar
- Mark43 vs Varonis Data Security Platform
- Mark43 vs VMware Carbon Black
- Mark43 vs Sysdig
- Mark43 vs Dahua Technology
- Mark43 vs Descope
- Mark43 vs Drata
- Mark43 vs DTiQ
- Mark43 vs ESET NOD32 Antivirus
- Mark43 vs ExpressVPN
- Proofpoint vs Accela
- Proofpoint vs CivicPlus
- Proofpoint vs Granicus
- Proofpoint vs DocuWare
- Proofpoint vs CentralSquare
- Proofpoint vs Tyler Brazos
- Proofpoint vs Axon Records
- Proofpoint vs Ring Neighbors
- Proofpoint vs SafeCity
- Proofpoint vs Vigilant Solutions
- Proofpoint vs Citizen
- Proofpoint vs IAPro
- Proofpoint vs CitizenLab
- Proofpoint vs ClearGov
- Proofpoint vs DemandStar
- Proofpoint vs eCode360
- Proofpoint vs MyRec.com
- Proofpoint vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Proofpoint vs Norton 360
- Proofpoint vs 1Password
- Proofpoint vs LastPass
- Proofpoint vs Trend Micro Vision One
- Proofpoint vs Mimecast
- Proofpoint vs Qualys VMDR
- Proofpoint vs Zscaler Internet Access
- Proofpoint vs IBM QRadar
- Proofpoint vs Varonis Data Security Platform
- Proofpoint vs VMware Carbon Black
- Proofpoint vs Sysdig
- Proofpoint vs Dahua Technology
- Proofpoint vs Descope
- Proofpoint vs Drata
- Proofpoint vs DTiQ
- Proofpoint vs ESET NOD32 Antivirus
- Proofpoint vs ExpressVPN

