Developer Tools · head to head
Hookdeck vs Neo4j

Hookdeck
Developer Tools
Event gateway that receives, queues, retries and replays inbound webhooks
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
The short version
- Neo4j is a native graph database.
- Free plans on both; paid from $39/mo and $65/mo.
- Only Hookdeck lists ingest and persist; only Neo4j lists native Graph Storage.
- Where Hookdeck falls short: pricing meters delivered events, so fan-out multiplies the bill: one inbound event routed to four services counts as four deliveries.
- Where Neo4j falls short: AuraDB Free has no service availability SLA, no backups and no point-in-time recovery.
- Prices and features on this page were last checked on 13 November 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Hookdeck and Neo4j actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes).
Not yet recorded: founded for Hookdeck.
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Hookdeck
- Ingest and persist
- Automatic retries
- Filters and fan-out
- Transformations
- Local development CLI
- Rate limiting
Only in Neo4j
- Native Graph Storage
- Cypher Query Language
- ACID Transactions
- High Availability
- Graph Data Science
- Full-text Search
- Native Indexes
- GraphQL
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Hookdeck
- A payments integration where losing a Stripe event during a deploy causes an order to go unfulfillednot Neo4j
- Fanning one provider webhook out to several internal services without each subscribing separatelynot Neo4j
- Debugging a partner integration by replaying the exact failing payload after shipping a fixnot Neo4j
- Receiving production-shaped webhooks on a developer laptop without running a public tunnelnot Neo4j
Neo4j
- Graph database for learning and explorationnot Hookdeck
- Production workloads requiring high availability and multi-zone redundancynot Hookdeck
- Enterprise deployments needing custom infrastructurenot Hookdeck
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Hookdeck
- Pricing meters delivered events, so fan-out multiplies the bill: one inbound event routed to four services counts as four deliveries
- Free-tier retention is three days, which is shorter than the time it typically takes to notice a failing integration, so the payloads needed for a replay are often already gone
- It becomes a single point of failure in front of every third-party integration, and an outage there means every provider webhook queues or fails at once
- The transformation layer runs JavaScript in a constrained environment, so anything that needs a database lookup or an external call has to happen downstream instead
- For a team already running Kafka or SQS the value is mostly the console and the replay UI, which is a hard cost to justify against infrastructure they already operate
Neo4j
- AuraDB Free has no service availability SLA, no backups and no point-in-time recovery
- AuraDB Free imposes limits on node and relationship counts and runs single-zone only
- SSO authentication and role-based access control are excluded from AuraDB Free and AuraDB Professional, starting only at Business Critical at $146 per GB per month with a 2GB minimum cluster
- AuraDB Professional starts at $65 per GB per month with a minimum 1GB cluster and caps at 128GB memory per instance
- AuraDB Professional backups are daily with only 7-day retention, against 30 days on Business Critical
- Customer managed keys and private endpoints are available only on AuraDB Virtual Dedicated Cloud, which is quote only with no published price
- Change data capture, query log forwarding, secondaries and access to Neo4j Professional Services are excluded below the Business Critical tier
- Support on AuraDB Free is community only and AuraDB Professional is best effort, with 24x7 one-hour response starting at Business Critical
- AuraDB Virtual Dedicated Cloud is sold on prepaid contract terms with enterprise commercial negotiation rather than self-serve card payment
Pricing, plan by plan
Hookdeck
Free- DeveloperFree
- Up to ten thousand events per month
- Three-day retention
- One user
- Team$39/mo
- Ten thousand events included
- Unlimited users
- Pay as you go metering above the included events
- Growth$499/mo
- Ten thousand events included plus metered usage
- Thirty-day retention
- Uptime and latency SLAs
- EnterpriseOn request
- Negotiated event volume
- Custom retention
- Dedicated support
Neo4j
Free- FreeFree
- Learning and exploration access
- No credit card required
- All graph tools included
- AuraDB Professional$65/gb/month
- 1GB minimum cluster
- Hourly billing available ($0.09/hour for 1GB)
- Daily backups with 7-day retention
- AuraDB Business Critical$146/gb/month
- 2GB minimum cluster
- Hourly billing available ($0.40/hour for 2GB)
- Up to 512GB maximum
- Virtual Dedicated CloudOn request
- Custom pricing via sales contact
- Dedicated VPC infrastructure
- Hourly backups with 60-day retention
Which should you pick?
Choose Hookdeck if
- You need ingest and persist.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Linux, macOS, Windows.
- You also want automatic retries.
Choose Neo4j if
- You need native graph storage.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Windows, macOS, Self-hosted, Web.
- You also want cypher query language.
Questions people ask
- Is Hookdeck or Neo4j better?
- Neither clearly leads. Hookdeck starts at Free and Neo4j at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Hookdeck or Neo4j?
- Hookdeck starts at Free and Neo4j at Free.
- Does Hookdeck or Neo4j run on more platforms?
- Hookdeck runs on Web, Linux, macOS, Windows. Neo4j runs on Linux, Windows, macOS, Self-hosted, Web.
- Can I use Hookdeck for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Hookdeck best used for?
- Hookdeck is most often used for a payments integration where losing a stripe event during a deploy causes an order to go unfulfilled, fanning one provider webhook out to several internal services without each subscribing separately, debugging a partner integration by replaying the exact failing payload after shipping a fix, receiving production-shaped webhooks on a developer laptop without running a public tunnel. Of those, a payments integration where losing a stripe event during a deploy causes an order to go unfulfilled and fanning one provider webhook out to several internal services without each subscribing separately are not what Neo4j is typically brought in for.
- What can Hookdeck do that Neo4j cannot?
- Hookdeck covers Ingest and persist, Automatic retries, Filters and fan-out, Transformations. Neo4j covers Native Graph Storage, Cypher Query Language, ACID Transactions, High Availability.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Hookdeck: Is there a free plan?
Yes, ten thousand events a month with three-day retention and one user.
Neo4j: Is Neo4j free?
Neo4j offers a free tier (AuraDB Free) for learning and exploration with no credit card required. Community Edition is also free and GPL3-licensed. Paid tiers start at $65/GB per month for AuraDB Professional.
SourceHookdeck: How is usage counted?
By delivered events, so a single inbound webhook fanned out to three destinations counts as three.
Neo4j: What does Neo4j's Professional tier include?
AuraDB Professional costs $65/GB per month with a 1GB minimum cluster, includes daily backups with 7-day retention, single-zone availability, and best-effort support. Hourly billing is available at $0.09/hour per GB.
SourceHookdeck: Can I replay a failed webhook?
Yes, individually or in bulk from the console, with the original payload.
Neo4j: What is Neo4j's most advanced pricing tier?
AuraDB Business Critical costs $146/GB per month with a 2GB minimum and includes multi-zone redundancy, 99.95% uptime SLA, 24/7 premium support with one-hour response times, and point-in-time recovery.
SourceHookdeck: Does it work for outbound webhooks too?
Yes, the same queueing, retry and observability applies to webhooks you send.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Hookdeck vs Jitsu
- Hookdeck vs Envoy
- Hookdeck vs Istio
- Hookdeck vs GitLab
- Hookdeck vs Spacelift
- Hookdeck vs Garden
- Hookdeck vs Webpack
- Hookdeck vs Backstage
- Hookdeck vs Cloud Native Buildpacks
- Hookdeck vs Dagger
- Hookdeck vs Okteto
- Hookdeck vs Terraform
- Hookdeck vs GitHub
- Hookdeck vs Harness
- Hookdeck vs IAR Embedded Workbench
- Hookdeck vs Keil MDK
- Hookdeck vs Moonrepo
- Hookdeck vs Nx Cloud
- Hookdeck vs Elasticsearch
- Hookdeck vs ArangoDB
- Hookdeck vs Dgraph
- Hookdeck vs Firebase Realtime Database
- Hookdeck vs DynamoDB
- Hookdeck vs Couchbase
- Hookdeck vs Cassandra
- Hookdeck vs DataGrip
- Hookdeck vs MongoDB
- Hookdeck vs RavenDB
- Hookdeck vs ScyllaDB
- Hookdeck vs Vitess
- Hookdeck vs Aiven
- Hookdeck vs BigQuery
- Hookdeck vs CosmosDB
- Hookdeck vs DataStax
- Hookdeck vs dbt
- Hookdeck vs CouchDB
- Neo4j vs Jitsu
- Neo4j vs Envoy
- Neo4j vs Istio
- Neo4j vs GitLab
- Neo4j vs Spacelift
- Neo4j vs Garden
- Neo4j vs Webpack
- Neo4j vs Backstage
- Neo4j vs Cloud Native Buildpacks
- Neo4j vs Dagger
- Neo4j vs Okteto
- Neo4j vs Terraform
- Neo4j vs GitHub
- Neo4j vs Harness
- Neo4j vs IAR Embedded Workbench
- Neo4j vs Keil MDK
- Neo4j vs Moonrepo
- Neo4j vs Nx Cloud
- Neo4j vs Elasticsearch
- Neo4j vs ArangoDB
- Neo4j vs Dgraph
- Neo4j vs Firebase Realtime Database
- Neo4j vs DynamoDB
- Neo4j vs Couchbase
- Neo4j vs Cassandra
- Neo4j vs DataGrip
- Neo4j vs MongoDB
- Neo4j vs RavenDB
- Neo4j vs ScyllaDB
- Neo4j vs Vitess
- Neo4j vs Aiven
- Neo4j vs BigQuery
- Neo4j vs CosmosDB
- Neo4j vs DataStax
- Neo4j vs dbt
- Neo4j vs CouchDB

