Developer Tools · head to head
Hookdeck vs ScyllaDB

Hookdeck
Developer Tools
Event gateway that receives, queues, retries and replays inbound webhooks
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes

ScyllaDB
Databases
The real-time big data database compatible with Cassandra
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
The short version
- ScyllaDB is a high-performance NoSQL database compatible.
- ScyllaDB is free; Hookdeck starts at $39/mo.
- Only Hookdeck lists ingest and persist; only ScyllaDB lists cassandra Compatible.
- Where Hookdeck falls short: pricing meters delivered events, so fan-out multiplies the bill: one inbound event routed to four services counts as four deliveries.
- Where ScyllaDB falls short: enterprise tier requires custom quote from sales.
- Prices and features on this page were last checked on 13 November 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Hookdeck and ScyllaDB actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes).
Not yet recorded: founded for Hookdeck.
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Hookdeck
- Ingest and persist
- Automatic retries
- Filters and fan-out
- Transformations
- Local development CLI
- Rate limiting
Only in ScyllaDB
- Cassandra Compatible
- DynamoDB Compatible
- 10x Throughput
- Low Latency
- Auto-tuning
- Lightweight Transactions
- Change Data Capture
- Cassandra Drivers
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Hookdeck
- A payments integration where losing a Stripe event during a deploy causes an order to go unfulfillednot ScyllaDB
- Fanning one provider webhook out to several internal services without each subscribing separatelynot ScyllaDB
- Debugging a partner integration by replaying the exact failing payload after shipping a fixnot ScyllaDB
- Receiving production-shaped webhooks on a developer laptop without running a public tunnelnot ScyllaDB
ScyllaDB
- Real-time applicationsnot Hookdeck
- Content managementnot Hookdeck
- User profilesnot Hookdeck
- Mobile backendsnot Hookdeck
- Cachingnot Hookdeck
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Hookdeck
- Pricing meters delivered events, so fan-out multiplies the bill: one inbound event routed to four services counts as four deliveries
- Free-tier retention is three days, which is shorter than the time it typically takes to notice a failing integration, so the payloads needed for a replay are often already gone
- It becomes a single point of failure in front of every third-party integration, and an outage there means every provider webhook queues or fails at once
- The transformation layer runs JavaScript in a constrained environment, so anything that needs a database lookup or an external call has to happen downstream instead
- For a team already running Kafka or SQS the value is mostly the console and the replay UI, which is a hard cost to justify against infrastructure they already operate
ScyllaDB
- Enterprise tier requires custom quote from sales
- Pricing varies by cloud provider, storage, and instance configuration
- Contracts available but commitment required for subscription discounts
Pricing, plan by plan
Hookdeck
Free- DeveloperFree
- Up to ten thousand events per month
- Three-day retention
- One user
- Team$39/mo
- Ten thousand events included
- Unlimited users
- Pay as you go metering above the included events
- Growth$499/mo
- Ten thousand events included plus metered usage
- Thirty-day retention
- Uptime and latency SLAs
- EnterpriseOn request
- Negotiated event volume
- Custom retention
- Dedicated support
ScyllaDB
Free- ScyllaDB Cloud StandardOn request
- Usage-based billing: vCPU, RAM, NVMe SSD storage
- 2-hour P1 support response time
- 99.9% uptime SLA
- ScyllaDB Cloud ProfessionalOn request
- Enterprise-grade scalability
- 1-hour P1 support response
- Enhanced features included
- ScyllaDB Cloud PremiumOn request
- Custom security and networking
- 15-minute P1 support response
- 99.99% uptime SLA
- ScyllaDB EnterpriseOn request
- Self-managed deployment
- On-premise or private cloud
- Custom quote required
Which should you pick?
Choose Hookdeck if
- You need ingest and persist.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Linux, macOS, Windows.
- You also want automatic retries.
Choose ScyllaDB if
- You need cassandra compatible.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Self-hosted, Web.
- You also want dynamodb compatible.
Questions people ask
- Is Hookdeck or ScyllaDB better?
- Neither clearly leads. Hookdeck starts at Free and ScyllaDB at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Hookdeck or ScyllaDB?
- Hookdeck starts at Free and ScyllaDB at Free.
- Does Hookdeck or ScyllaDB run on more platforms?
- Hookdeck runs on Web, Linux, macOS, Windows. ScyllaDB runs on Linux, Self-hosted, Web.
- Can I use Hookdeck for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Hookdeck best used for?
- Hookdeck is most often used for a payments integration where losing a stripe event during a deploy causes an order to go unfulfilled, fanning one provider webhook out to several internal services without each subscribing separately, debugging a partner integration by replaying the exact failing payload after shipping a fix, receiving production-shaped webhooks on a developer laptop without running a public tunnel. Of those, a payments integration where losing a stripe event during a deploy causes an order to go unfulfilled and fanning one provider webhook out to several internal services without each subscribing separately are not what ScyllaDB is typically brought in for.
- What can Hookdeck do that ScyllaDB cannot?
- Hookdeck covers Ingest and persist, Automatic retries, Filters and fan-out, Transformations. ScyllaDB covers Cassandra Compatible, DynamoDB Compatible, 10x Throughput, Low Latency.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Hookdeck: Is there a free plan?
Yes, ten thousand events a month with three-day retention and one user.
ScyllaDB: How is ScyllaDB Cloud pricing calculated?
ScyllaDB Cloud uses transparent, resource-based billing based on instance type (vCPU and RAM), NVMe SSD storage, service plan tier, deployment model, and cloud provider costs.
SourceHookdeck: How is usage counted?
By delivered events, so a single inbound webhook fanned out to three destinations counts as three.
ScyllaDB: Does ScyllaDB offer a free trial?
ScyllaDB offers a 30-day developer trial on smaller instances and a 48-hour production evaluation trial with full-grade instances.
SourceHookdeck: Can I replay a failed webhook?
Yes, individually or in bulk from the console, with the original payload.
ScyllaDB: What cost savings are available for long-term ScyllaDB commitments?
ScyllaDB subscription contracts provide up to 70% or more in savings compared to on-demand hourly billing. 1-year and 3-year contract options are available.
SourceHookdeck: Does it work for outbound webhooks too?
Yes, the same queueing, retry and observability applies to webhooks you send.
ScyllaDB: How much cheaper is ScyllaDB than DynamoDB?
Unlike DynamoDB which charges per read/write unit, ScyllaDB charges based on resource usage only, potentially delivering 50% or greater cost reduction for high-throughput workloads.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Hookdeck vs Jitsu
- Hookdeck vs Envoy
- Hookdeck vs Istio
- Hookdeck vs GitLab
- Hookdeck vs Spacelift
- Hookdeck vs Garden
- Hookdeck vs Webpack
- Hookdeck vs Backstage
- Hookdeck vs Cloud Native Buildpacks
- Hookdeck vs Dagger
- Hookdeck vs Okteto
- Hookdeck vs Terraform
- Hookdeck vs GitHub
- Hookdeck vs Harness
- Hookdeck vs IAR Embedded Workbench
- Hookdeck vs Keil MDK
- Hookdeck vs Moonrepo
- Hookdeck vs Nx Cloud
- Hookdeck vs Cassandra
- Hookdeck vs MongoDB
- Hookdeck vs Couchbase
- Hookdeck vs DataStax
- Hookdeck vs Firebase Realtime Database
- Hookdeck vs DynamoDB
- Hookdeck vs RavenDB
- Hookdeck vs DataGrip
- Hookdeck vs Dgraph
- Hookdeck vs Instaclustr
- Hookdeck vs Elasticsearch
- Hookdeck vs turbopuffer
- Hookdeck vs VerneMQ
- Hookdeck vs Vespa
- Hookdeck vs Xata
- Hookdeck vs YugabyteDB
- Hookdeck vs Zilliz
- Hookdeck vs CouchDB
- ScyllaDB vs Jitsu
- ScyllaDB vs Envoy
- ScyllaDB vs Istio
- ScyllaDB vs GitLab
- ScyllaDB vs Spacelift
- ScyllaDB vs Garden
- ScyllaDB vs Webpack
- ScyllaDB vs Backstage
- ScyllaDB vs Cloud Native Buildpacks
- ScyllaDB vs Dagger
- ScyllaDB vs Okteto
- ScyllaDB vs Terraform
- ScyllaDB vs GitHub
- ScyllaDB vs Harness
- ScyllaDB vs IAR Embedded Workbench
- ScyllaDB vs Keil MDK
- ScyllaDB vs Moonrepo
- ScyllaDB vs Nx Cloud
- ScyllaDB vs Cassandra
- ScyllaDB vs MongoDB
- ScyllaDB vs Couchbase
- ScyllaDB vs DataStax
- ScyllaDB vs Firebase Realtime Database
- ScyllaDB vs DynamoDB
- ScyllaDB vs RavenDB
- ScyllaDB vs DataGrip
- ScyllaDB vs Dgraph
- ScyllaDB vs Instaclustr
- ScyllaDB vs Elasticsearch
- ScyllaDB vs turbopuffer
- ScyllaDB vs VerneMQ
- ScyllaDB vs Vespa
- ScyllaDB vs Xata
- ScyllaDB vs YugabyteDB
- ScyllaDB vs Zilliz
- ScyllaDB vs CouchDB
