Databases · head to head
CosmosDB vs Hookdeck

CosmosDB
Databases
Globally distributed, multi-model database service from Azure
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes

Hookdeck
Developer Tools
Event gateway that receives, queues, retries and replays inbound webhooks
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
The short version
- CosmosDB is free; Hookdeck starts at $39/mo.
- Only CosmosDB lists global Distribution; only Hookdeck lists ingest and persist.
- Where CosmosDB falls short: autoscale provisioned throughput enforces a minimum of 1,000 RU/s, billed hourly whether or not the database is used.
- Where Hookdeck falls short: pricing meters delivered events, so fan-out multiplies the bill: one inbound event routed to four services counts as four deliveries.
- Prices and features on this page were last checked on 13 November 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which CosmosDB and Hookdeck actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes).
Not yet recorded: founded for Hookdeck.
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in CosmosDB
- Global Distribution
- Multi-model APIs
- Elastic Scaling
- Five Consistency Levels
- SLA-backed Latency
- Automatic Indexing
- Serverless
- Azure Functions
Only in Hookdeck
- Ingest and persist
- Automatic retries
- Filters and fan-out
- Transformations
- Local development CLI
- Rate limiting
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
CosmosDB
- Running a globally distributed multi model database on Azurenot Hookdeck
- Serving low latency reads and writes from multiple Azure regionsnot Hookdeck
- Storing document, key value and graph data behind a managed servicenot Hookdeck
Hookdeck
- A payments integration where losing a Stripe event during a deploy causes an order to go unfulfillednot CosmosDB
- Fanning one provider webhook out to several internal services without each subscribing separatelynot CosmosDB
- Debugging a partner integration by replaying the exact failing payload after shipping a fixnot CosmosDB
- Receiving production-shaped webhooks on a developer laptop without running a public tunnelnot CosmosDB
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
CosmosDB
- Autoscale provisioned throughput enforces a minimum of 1,000 RU/s, billed hourly whether or not the database is used
- Provisioned throughput is charged in every region the account is replicated to, so multi region accounts multiply the RU bill
- Storage charges cover data, indexes and backups in each replicated region
- Egress out of Azure and between regions is charged, though ingress is free
- The free allowance is one account per Azure subscription, limited to 1,000 RU/s and 25 GB
- RU/s rates vary by region and are only shown through the pricing calculator rather than a flat published rate
Hookdeck
- Pricing meters delivered events, so fan-out multiplies the bill: one inbound event routed to four services counts as four deliveries
- Free-tier retention is three days, which is shorter than the time it typically takes to notice a failing integration, so the payloads needed for a replay are often already gone
- It becomes a single point of failure in front of every third-party integration, and an outage there means every provider webhook queues or fails at once
- The transformation layer runs JavaScript in a constrained environment, so anything that needs a database lookup or an external call has to happen downstream instead
- For a team already running Kafka or SQS the value is mostly the console and the replay UI, which is a hard cost to justify against infrastructure they already operate
Pricing, plan by plan
CosmosDB
Free- Free TierFree
- 1000 RU/s
- 25GB storage
- First 12 months
- ServerlessFree
- Pay per request
- Auto-scaling
- Event-driven workloads
Hookdeck
Free- DeveloperFree
- Up to ten thousand events per month
- Three-day retention
- One user
- Team$39/mo
- Ten thousand events included
- Unlimited users
- Pay as you go metering above the included events
- Growth$499/mo
- Ten thousand events included plus metered usage
- Thirty-day retention
- Uptime and latency SLAs
- EnterpriseOn request
- Negotiated event volume
- Custom retention
- Dedicated support
Which should you pick?
Choose CosmosDB if
- You need global distribution.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Azure.
- You also want multi-model apis.
Choose Hookdeck if
- You need ingest and persist.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Linux, macOS, Windows.
- You also want automatic retries.
Questions people ask
- Is CosmosDB or Hookdeck better?
- Neither clearly leads. CosmosDB starts at Free and Hookdeck at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, CosmosDB or Hookdeck?
- CosmosDB starts at Free and Hookdeck at Free.
- Does CosmosDB or Hookdeck run on more platforms?
- CosmosDB runs on Web, Azure. Hookdeck runs on Web, Linux, macOS, Windows.
- Can I use CosmosDB for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is CosmosDB best used for?
- CosmosDB is most often used for running a globally distributed multi model database on azure, serving low latency reads and writes from multiple azure regions, storing document, key value and graph data behind a managed service. Of those, running a globally distributed multi model database on azure and serving low latency reads and writes from multiple azure regions are not what Hookdeck is typically brought in for.
- What can CosmosDB do that Hookdeck cannot?
- CosmosDB covers Global Distribution, Multi-model APIs, Elastic Scaling, Five Consistency Levels. Hookdeck covers Ingest and persist, Automatic retries, Filters and fan-out, Transformations.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
CosmosDB: Is there a free tier for Azure Cosmos DB?
Yes, Cosmos DB offers a free tier with 1,000 RU/s of throughput and 25 GB of storage per month for the lifetime of the account, available to new accounts.
SourceHookdeck: Is there a free plan?
Yes, ten thousand events a month with three-day retention and one user.
CosmosDB: How is Cosmos DB priced after the free tier?
Cosmos DB uses three billing models: provisioned throughput billed per request unit per second, vCore pricing for certain APIs, or serverless consumption pricing where you pay only for requests processed. Reserved capacity offers 20% discount for one year or 30% for three years.
SourceHookdeck: How is usage counted?
By delivered events, so a single inbound webhook fanned out to three destinations counts as three.
CosmosDB: Can I change my pricing model after choosing one?
No. Once you select a compute pricing model and API, they cannot be changed. This choice is permanent for that database.
SourceHookdeck: Can I replay a failed webhook?
Yes, individually or in bulk from the console, with the original payload.
CosmosDB: Is there a trial period for Cosmos DB beyond the free tier?
Azure offers a 30-day free trial account for all Azure services. Additionally, Azure AI customers may be eligible for a 90-day free Cosmos DB subscription through the Azure AI Advantage program.
SourceHookdeck: Does it work for outbound webhooks too?
Yes, the same queueing, retry and observability applies to webhooks you send.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- CosmosDB vs MongoDB
- CosmosDB vs Cockroach Labs
- CosmosDB vs Amazon Redshift
- CosmosDB vs Google Cloud SQL
- CosmosDB vs ArangoDB
- CosmosDB vs DataStax
- CosmosDB vs FaunaDB
- CosmosDB vs Firebolt
- CosmosDB vs RavenDB
- CosmosDB vs RisingWave
- CosmosDB vs ScyllaDB
- CosmosDB vs Solace PubSub+
- CosmosDB vs SQLite
- CosmosDB vs StarRocks
- CosmosDB vs SurrealDB
- CosmosDB vs Amazon Aurora
- CosmosDB vs BigQuery
- CosmosDB vs Amazon RDS
- CosmosDB vs Jitsu
- CosmosDB vs Envoy
- CosmosDB vs Istio
- CosmosDB vs GitLab
- CosmosDB vs Spacelift
- CosmosDB vs Garden
- CosmosDB vs Webpack
- CosmosDB vs Backstage
- CosmosDB vs Cloud Native Buildpacks
- CosmosDB vs Dagger
- CosmosDB vs Okteto
- CosmosDB vs Terraform
- CosmosDB vs GitHub
- CosmosDB vs Harness
- CosmosDB vs IAR Embedded Workbench
- CosmosDB vs Keil MDK
- CosmosDB vs Moonrepo
- CosmosDB vs Nx Cloud
- Hookdeck vs MongoDB
- Hookdeck vs Cockroach Labs
- Hookdeck vs Amazon Redshift
- Hookdeck vs Google Cloud SQL
- Hookdeck vs ArangoDB
- Hookdeck vs DataStax
- Hookdeck vs FaunaDB
- Hookdeck vs Firebolt
- Hookdeck vs RavenDB
- Hookdeck vs RisingWave
- Hookdeck vs ScyllaDB
- Hookdeck vs Solace PubSub+
- Hookdeck vs SQLite
- Hookdeck vs StarRocks
- Hookdeck vs SurrealDB
- Hookdeck vs Amazon Aurora
- Hookdeck vs BigQuery
- Hookdeck vs Amazon RDS
- Hookdeck vs Jitsu
- Hookdeck vs Envoy
- Hookdeck vs Istio
- Hookdeck vs GitLab
- Hookdeck vs Spacelift
- Hookdeck vs Garden
- Hookdeck vs Webpack
- Hookdeck vs Backstage
- Hookdeck vs Cloud Native Buildpacks
- Hookdeck vs Dagger
- Hookdeck vs Okteto
- Hookdeck vs Terraform
- Hookdeck vs GitHub
- Hookdeck vs Harness
- Hookdeck vs IAR Embedded Workbench
- Hookdeck vs Keil MDK
- Hookdeck vs Moonrepo
- Hookdeck vs Nx Cloud
