Technology · head to head
Height vs Keycloak
Height
Technology
A project management tool from a small independent vendor that uses AI agents to handle routine ticket maintenance.
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
Keycloak
Developer Tools
Open-source identity and access management server.
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Height it is one product from one small venture-funded company with no second line of business underwriting it, so adopting it as your system of record is a bet on that company's funding, and the tool holds work history you would have to reconstruct elsewhere if the bet fails.; Keycloak requires self-hosted deployment and operational expertise to install, configure and maintain
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Height and Keycloak actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Height
- Autonomous triage
- Duplicate detection
- Attribute maintenance
- Per-task chat
- Multiple views
- Developer integrations
- Custom fields and filters
- Public API
Only in Keycloak
Nothing recorded that Height does not also cover.
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Height
- A product or engineering team with no dedicated project manager, where backlog upkeep currently falls on whoever has timenot Keycloak
- Teams leaving Jira because its configuration and administration cost more attention than the tracking is worthnot Keycloak
- A support or intake queue where incoming requests need categorising and deduplicating before anyone can plan themnot Keycloak
- Startups that want tasks, chat and progress tracking in one tool rather than stitching a tracker to a chat appnot Keycloak
Keycloak
- Organisations requiring self-hosted identity infrastructure for compliance or data residencynot Height
- Companies with existing LDAP/Active Directory systems needing federated authenticationnot Height
- Open-source projects and communities requiring free IAM without licensing costsnot Height
- Enterprises building custom identity workflows requiring fine-grained authorisationnot Height
- Teams with sufficient operational expertise to manage infrastructurenot Height
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Height
- It is one product from one small venture-funded company with no second line of business underwriting it, so adopting it as your system of record is a bet on that company's funding, and the tool holds work history you would have to reconstruct elsewhere if the bet fails.
- The 2024 relaunch as Height 2.0 reoriented the product around AI agents and changed workflows customers had already built on, which is the clearest available evidence of how much the product may be re-shaped again under you.
- The ecosystem is small next to Jira, Linear and Asana: fewer third-party integrations, no consultancy market, and far less written material to search when something behaves unexpectedly, so support questions go to the vendor and wait.
- The automation only pays off if tasks contain enough substance for a model to work with; on a team whose tickets are two-word titles, the agents have nothing to triage or deduplicate and the product reduces to an ordinary tracker at a premium.
- Task content is processed by hosted large language models, so a security review becomes a question about subprocessors and data handling, and there is no self-hosted or on-premises deployment to fall back on if the answer is unacceptable.
- There is no widely used two-way synchronisation with Jira, so an organisation where one team adopts Height and the rest stay on Jira ends up with two systems of record and manual reconciliation between them.
Keycloak
- Requires self-hosted deployment and operational expertise to install, configure and maintain
- No managed cloud option provided by Red Hat; organisations must operate infrastructure themselves or use third-party distributions
- Clustering and high-availability configurations require additional operational knowledge
- Community support only; commercial support requires third-party vendors or distributions
Pricing, plan by plan
Height
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the Height review.
Keycloak
Free- Open-sourceFree
- Full platform functionality
- Self-hosted deployment
- Community support
Which should you pick?
Choose Height if
- You need autonomous triage.
- You want to start without paying.
- You also want duplicate detection.
Choose Keycloak if
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Self-hosted, Docker, Kubernetes, Linux, Windows, API.
Questions people ask
- Is Height or Keycloak better?
- Neither clearly leads. Height starts at Free and Keycloak at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Height or Keycloak?
- Height starts at Free and Keycloak at Free.
- Does Height or Keycloak run on more platforms?
- Height runs on Web. Keycloak runs on Self-hosted, Docker, Kubernetes, Linux, Windows, API.
- Can I use Height for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Height best used for?
- Height is most often used for a product or engineering team with no dedicated project manager, where backlog upkeep currently falls on whoever has time, teams leaving jira because its configuration and administration cost more attention than the tracking is worth, a support or intake queue where incoming requests need categorising and deduplicating before anyone can plan them, startups that want tasks, chat and progress tracking in one tool rather than stitching a tracker to a chat app. Of those, a product or engineering team with no dedicated project manager, where backlog upkeep currently falls on whoever has time and teams leaving jira because its configuration and administration cost more attention than the tracking is worth are not what Keycloak is typically brought in for.
- What can Height do that Keycloak cannot?
- Height covers Autonomous triage, Duplicate detection, Attribute maintenance, Per-task chat.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Height: How is this different from Jira automation?
Jira automation is rule-based: you define a trigger and an action. Height's agents read the content of tasks and act on judgement, such as recognising that two tickets describe the same bug, which no rule can express.
Keycloak: What protocols does Keycloak support?
Keycloak supports OpenID Connect, OAuth 2.0 and SAML 2.0 protocols for authentication and authorisation.
SourceHeight: Can we self-host it?
No. It is software as a service only, with no on-premises or private-cloud deployment. If your requirements rule out a hosted tracker, this is not a candidate.
Keycloak: Can Keycloak integrate with existing user directories?
Yes. Keycloak supports user federation with LDAP and Active Directory systems, allowing organisations to leverage existing user directories.
SourceHeight: What happens to our data if the company fails?
You would need an export and a migration to another tool. This is the standard risk with a single-product startup, and it is worth confirming the export path covers task history, comments and custom fields before committing to it.
Keycloak: Is Keycloak free?
Yes. Keycloak is fully open-source and free to deploy and use. No licensing fees are required.
SourceHeight: Does it work for non-engineering teams?
Yes, the views and custom fields are generic enough for marketing, operations or support queues. Its integrations, though, are aimed at software teams, so a non-engineering team gets less of the surrounding value.
Height: Do the AI features need our tickets to be well written?
In practice, yes. Triage, deduplication and attribute maintenance work from what is written in the task, so the return is much higher on a team that already writes descriptive tickets than on one that does not.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Height vs Asana
- Height vs ClickUp
- Height vs Linear
- Height vs Monday.com
- Height vs Shortcut
- Height vs Coda
- Height vs Intercom
- Height vs Attio
- Height vs Jenkins
- Height vs Kubernetes
- Height vs Notion
- Height vs Figma
- Height vs Site24x7
- Height vs StatusCake
- Height vs Storybook
- Height vs WebStorm
- Height vs Zabbix Cloud
- Height vs Penpot
- Height vs Soketi
- Height vs Ansible
- Height vs Atlantis
- Height vs Vite
- Height vs Depot
- Height vs Pants Build
- Height vs Buildkite
- Height vs Coder
- Height vs Jitsu
- Height vs Bitbucket
- Height vs Sweep
- Height vs Azure DevOps
- Height vs Backstage
- Height vs Claude Code
- Height vs Cloud Native Buildpacks
- Height vs Cody
- Keycloak vs Asana
- Keycloak vs ClickUp
- Keycloak vs Linear
- Keycloak vs Monday.com
- Keycloak vs Shortcut
- Keycloak vs Coda
- Keycloak vs Intercom
- Keycloak vs Attio
- Keycloak vs Jenkins
- Keycloak vs Kubernetes
- Keycloak vs Notion
- Keycloak vs Figma
- Keycloak vs Site24x7
- Keycloak vs StatusCake
- Keycloak vs Storybook
- Keycloak vs WebStorm
- Keycloak vs Zabbix Cloud
- Keycloak vs Penpot
- Keycloak vs Soketi
- Keycloak vs Ansible
- Keycloak vs Atlantis
- Keycloak vs Vite
- Keycloak vs Depot
- Keycloak vs Pants Build
- Keycloak vs Buildkite
- Keycloak vs Coder
- Keycloak vs Jitsu
- Keycloak vs Bitbucket
- Keycloak vs Sweep
- Keycloak vs Azure DevOps
- Keycloak vs Backstage
- Keycloak vs Claude Code
- Keycloak vs Cloud Native Buildpacks
- Keycloak vs Cody