Developer Tools · head to head
Keycloak vs Linear

Keycloak
Developer Tools
Open-source identity and access management server.
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Keycloak requires self-hosted deployment and operational expertise to install, configure and maintain; Linear no task-level Gantt chart; Timeline view is available for projects only, not individual issues
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Keycloak and Linear actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Keycloak
Nothing recorded that Linear does not also cover.
Only in Linear
- Fast, real-time sync
- Keyboard-first design
- Automatic issue tracking
- Cycles (sprints)
- Projects & milestones
- Custom workflows
- API & webhooks
- Built-in roadmaps
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Keycloak
- Organisations requiring self-hosted identity infrastructure for compliance or data residencynot Linear
- Companies with existing LDAP/Active Directory systems needing federated authenticationnot Linear
- Open-source projects and communities requiring free IAM without licensing costsnot Linear
- Enterprises building custom identity workflows requiring fine-grained authorisationnot Linear
- Teams with sufficient operational expertise to manage infrastructurenot Linear
Linear
- Issue management and triage, converting customer feedback into prioritized issuesnot Keycloak
- Strategic planning via initiatives, roadmaps, and PRDs from idea to launchnot Keycloak
- Agent-assisted development, with agents drafting docs and submitting pull requestsnot Keycloak
- Code review with structural diffs for human and agent outputnot Keycloak
- Progress monitoring via dashboards tracking cycle times and project healthnot Keycloak
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Keycloak
- Requires self-hosted deployment and operational expertise to install, configure and maintain
- No managed cloud option provided by Red Hat; organisations must operate infrastructure themselves or use third-party distributions
- Clustering and high-availability configurations require additional operational knowledge
- Community support only; commercial support requires third-party vendors or distributions
Linear
- No task-level Gantt chart; Timeline view is available for projects only, not individual issues
- No native time-tracking or hour-logging feature
- No native Linux desktop app; official FAQ states it 'may come in the future but it's not on the roadmap for now'
- Free tier capped at 250 issues and 2 teams
Pricing, plan by plan
Keycloak
Free- Open-sourceFree
- Full platform functionality
- Self-hosted deployment
- Community support
Linear
Free- FreeFree
- Unlimited members
- 2 teams
- 250 issues
- Basic$10/month
- 5 teams
- Unlimited issues
- Unlimited file uploads
- Business$16/month
- Unlimited teams
- Private teams/guests
- Triage Intelligence
- Enterprise$undefined/month
- SAML/SCIM
- Granular admin controls
- Invoice/PO billing
Which should you pick?
Choose Keycloak if
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Self-hosted, Docker, Kubernetes, Linux, Windows, API.
Choose Linear if
- You need fast, real-time sync.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android, macOS, Windows.
- You also want keyboard-first design.
Questions people ask
- Is Keycloak or Linear better?
- Neither clearly leads. Keycloak starts at Free and Linear at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Keycloak or Linear?
- Keycloak starts at Free and Linear at Free.
- Does Keycloak or Linear run on more platforms?
- Keycloak runs on Self-hosted, Docker, Kubernetes, Linux, Windows, API. Linear runs on Web, iOS, Android, macOS, Windows.
- Can I use Keycloak for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Keycloak best used for?
- Keycloak is most often used for organisations requiring self-hosted identity infrastructure for compliance or data residency, companies with existing ldap/active directory systems needing federated authentication, open-source projects and communities requiring free iam without licensing costs, enterprises building custom identity workflows requiring fine-grained authorisation. Of those, organisations requiring self-hosted identity infrastructure for compliance or data residency and companies with existing ldap/active directory systems needing federated authentication are not what Linear is typically brought in for.
- What can Keycloak do that Linear cannot?
- Linear covers Fast, real-time sync, Keyboard-first design, Automatic issue tracking, Cycles (sprints).
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Keycloak: What protocols does Keycloak support?
Keycloak supports OpenID Connect, OAuth 2.0 and SAML 2.0 protocols for authentication and authorisation.
SourceLinear: How much does Linear cost?
Linear has a free tier supporting 2 teams and 250 issues. Paid plans start at $10 per user per month for Basic and $16 per user per month for Business. Annual billing is required for paid tiers.
SourceKeycloak: Can Keycloak integrate with existing user directories?
Yes. Keycloak supports user federation with LDAP and Active Directory systems, allowing organisations to leverage existing user directories.
SourceLinear: What are the file upload limits on Linear?
The free tier is restricted to 10MB file uploads per team. Paid plans offer unlimited file uploads.
SourceKeycloak: Is Keycloak free?
Yes. Keycloak is fully open-source and free to deploy and use. No licensing fees are required.
SourceLinear: Does Linear offer an Enterprise plan?
Yes, Linear offers an Enterprise tier with custom pricing, annual billing required, SAML and SCIM support, granular admin controls, and priority support.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Keycloak vs Penpot
- Keycloak vs Soketi
- Keycloak vs Ansible
- Keycloak vs Atlantis
- Keycloak vs Vite
- Keycloak vs Depot
- Keycloak vs Pants Build
- Keycloak vs Buildkite
- Keycloak vs Coder
- Keycloak vs Jitsu
- Keycloak vs Bitbucket
- Keycloak vs Sweep
- Keycloak vs Azure DevOps
- Keycloak vs Backstage
- Keycloak vs Claude Code
- Keycloak vs Cloud Native Buildpacks
- Keycloak vs Cody
- Keycloak vs Plane
- Keycloak vs Jira
- Keycloak vs Shortcut
- Keycloak vs Aha!
- Keycloak vs Attio
- Keycloak vs Height
- Keycloak vs Sublime Text
- Keycloak vs Productboard
- Keycloak vs Canny
- Keycloak vs Superhuman
- Keycloak vs Greenhouse
- Keycloak vs Netlify
- Keycloak vs PyCharm
- Keycloak vs Sketch
- Keycloak vs Thought Machine
- Keycloak vs Userpilot
- Keycloak vs Alkami
- Linear vs Penpot
- Linear vs Soketi
- Linear vs Ansible
- Linear vs Atlantis
- Linear vs Vite
- Linear vs Depot
- Linear vs Pants Build
- Linear vs Buildkite
- Linear vs Coder
- Linear vs Jitsu
- Linear vs Bitbucket
- Linear vs Sweep
- Linear vs Azure DevOps
- Linear vs Backstage
- Linear vs Claude Code
- Linear vs Cloud Native Buildpacks
- Linear vs Cody
- Linear vs Plane
- Linear vs Jira
- Linear vs Shortcut
- Linear vs Aha!
- Linear vs Attio
- Linear vs Height
- Linear vs Sublime Text
- Linear vs Productboard
- Linear vs Canny
- Linear vs Superhuman
- Linear vs Greenhouse
- Linear vs Netlify
- Linear vs PyCharm
- Linear vs Sketch
- Linear vs Thought Machine
- Linear vs Userpilot
- Linear vs Alkami

