Developer Tools · head to head
Keycloak vs Site24x7

Keycloak
Developer Tools
Open-source identity and access management server.
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes

Site24x7
Technology
All-in-one monitoring for DevOps and IT operations
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Keycloak requires self-hosted deployment and operational expertise to install, configure and maintain; Site24x7 website and infrastructure monitoring are sold as separate plan tracks; the entry Web Uptime plan ($9/month annual) covers only 25 websites and does not include server monitoring, which requires a separate Lite infrastructure plan
- Prices and features above were last checked on 29 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Keycloak and Site24x7 actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Keycloak
- Organisations requiring self-hosted identity infrastructure for compliance or data residencynot Site24x7
- Companies with existing LDAP/Active Directory systems needing federated authenticationnot Site24x7
- Open-source projects and communities requiring free IAM without licensing costsnot Site24x7
- Enterprises building custom identity workflows requiring fine-grained authorisationnot Site24x7
- Teams with sufficient operational expertise to manage infrastructurenot Site24x7
Site24x7
- Monitoring uptime and performance from worldwide locationsnot Keycloak
- Tracking real user performance for each page visitnot Keycloak
- Monitoring servers across AWS, Azure, GCP environmentsnot Keycloak
- Identifying code-level bottlenecks through distributed tracingnot Keycloak
- Detecting anomalies and root causes before impacting usersnot Keycloak
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Keycloak
- Requires self-hosted deployment and operational expertise to install, configure and maintain
- No managed cloud option provided by Red Hat; organisations must operate infrastructure themselves or use third-party distributions
- Clustering and high-availability configurations require additional operational knowledge
- Community support only; commercial support requires third-party vendors or distributions
Site24x7
- Website and infrastructure monitoring are sold as separate plan tracks; the entry Web Uptime plan ($9/month annual) covers only 25 websites and does not include server monitoring, which requires a separate Lite infrastructure plan
- Entry infrastructure Lite plan covers only 2 servers and 25 child resources before requiring an upgrade to Professional
- The discounted monthly-equivalent prices shown (e.g. $9/month for Web Uptime) require annual prepayment; standard monthly billing is priced higher (e.g. $10/month)
- Enterprise tier pricing starts at $625/month and Enterprise Plus Web at $899/month, both paid annually
Pricing, plan by plan
Keycloak
Free- Open-sourceFree
- Full platform functionality
- Self-hosted deployment
- Community support
Site24x7
Free- FreeFree
- Monitor uptime of up to 50 resources
- Instant downtime email alerts
- Web Uptime$9/month
- 25 websites included
- Annual billing
- Web Perf$36/month
- 40 websites
- 8 transaction monitors
- Annual billing
- Enterprise Plus Web$899/month
- 2,500 websites
- Enterprise features
Which should you pick?
Choose Keycloak if
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Self-hosted, Docker, Kubernetes, Linux, Windows, API.
Questions people ask
- Is Keycloak or Site24x7 better?
- Neither clearly leads. Keycloak starts at Free and Site24x7 at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Keycloak or Site24x7?
- Keycloak starts at Free and Site24x7 at Free.
- Does Keycloak or Site24x7 run on more platforms?
- Keycloak runs on Self-hosted, Docker, Kubernetes, Linux, Windows, API. Site24x7 runs on Web.
- Can I use Keycloak for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Keycloak best used for?
- Keycloak is most often used for organisations requiring self-hosted identity infrastructure for compliance or data residency, companies with existing ldap/active directory systems needing federated authentication, open-source projects and communities requiring free iam without licensing costs, enterprises building custom identity workflows requiring fine-grained authorisation. Of those, organisations requiring self-hosted identity infrastructure for compliance or data residency and companies with existing ldap/active directory systems needing federated authentication are not what Site24x7 is typically brought in for.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Keycloak: What protocols does Keycloak support?
Keycloak supports OpenID Connect, OAuth 2.0 and SAML 2.0 protocols for authentication and authorisation.
SourceSite24x7: How much does Site24x7 cost?
Site24x7 pricing starts at $9 per month for web monitoring (25 websites) with annual billing, or $10 per month with monthly billing. Enterprise plans scale to $899 per month for website monitoring and $625 per month for infrastructure monitoring.
SourceKeycloak: Can Keycloak integrate with existing user directories?
Yes. Keycloak supports user federation with LDAP and Active Directory systems, allowing organisations to leverage existing user directories.
SourceSite24x7: Does Site24x7 offer a free tier?
Yes, Site24x7 offers a free forever plan allowing users to monitor the uptime of up to 50 resources with instant downtime email alerts. Higher plans provide monitoring for hundreds or thousands of resources with advanced features.
SourceKeycloak: Is Keycloak free?
Yes. Keycloak is fully open-source and free to deploy and use. No licensing fees are required.
SourceSite24x7: What add-ons are available for Site24x7?
Site24x7 offers modular add-ons including uptime monitors ($18-$140/month), log ingestion ($3-$12 per 10GB monthly), RUM page views ($25-$300/month), and cloud monitoring (starting at $1/resource/month). Pricing varies based on usage and plan tier.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Keycloak vs Penpot
- Keycloak vs Soketi
- Keycloak vs Ansible
- Keycloak vs Atlantis
- Keycloak vs Vite
- Keycloak vs Depot
- Keycloak vs Pants Build
- Keycloak vs Buildkite
- Keycloak vs Coder
- Keycloak vs Jitsu
- Keycloak vs Bitbucket
- Keycloak vs Sweep
- Keycloak vs Azure DevOps
- Keycloak vs Backstage
- Keycloak vs Claude Code
- Keycloak vs Cloud Native Buildpacks
- Keycloak vs Cody
- Keycloak vs Asana
- Keycloak vs ClickUp
- Keycloak vs Figma
- Keycloak vs Linear
- Keycloak vs UptimeRobot
- Keycloak vs Checkmk
- Keycloak vs StatusCake
- Keycloak vs PagerDuty
- Keycloak vs Alkami
- Keycloak vs LogRocket
- Keycloak vs Jenkins
- Keycloak vs Nagios XI
- Keycloak vs Dropbox
- Keycloak vs Eclipse
- Keycloak vs Lovable
- Keycloak vs Miro
- Keycloak vs Personetics
- Site24x7 vs Penpot
- Site24x7 vs Soketi
- Site24x7 vs Ansible
- Site24x7 vs Atlantis
- Site24x7 vs Vite
- Site24x7 vs Depot
- Site24x7 vs Pants Build
- Site24x7 vs Buildkite
- Site24x7 vs Coder
- Site24x7 vs Jitsu
- Site24x7 vs Bitbucket
- Site24x7 vs Sweep
- Site24x7 vs Azure DevOps
- Site24x7 vs Backstage
- Site24x7 vs Claude Code
- Site24x7 vs Cloud Native Buildpacks
- Site24x7 vs Cody
- Site24x7 vs Asana
- Site24x7 vs ClickUp
- Site24x7 vs Figma
- Site24x7 vs Linear
- Site24x7 vs UptimeRobot
- Site24x7 vs Checkmk
- Site24x7 vs StatusCake
- Site24x7 vs PagerDuty
- Site24x7 vs Alkami
- Site24x7 vs LogRocket
- Site24x7 vs Jenkins
- Site24x7 vs Nagios XI
- Site24x7 vs Dropbox
- Site24x7 vs Eclipse
- Site24x7 vs Lovable
- Site24x7 vs Miro
- Site24x7 vs Personetics
