Technology · head to head
Heap vs Sigma Computing

Sigma Computing
Spreadsheets
Spreadsheet-style analytics that queries a cloud data warehouse directly with no extract layer
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Heap has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Heap no built-in A/B testing or feature flags; requires integration with separate tools for experimentation; Sigma Computing every user interaction is a live warehouse query, so compute costs rise with adoption and land on the warehouse invoice rather than the BI line item, which routinely surprises the team that approved the purchase.
- They diverge on capability: Heap covers Autocapture, Sigma Computing covers Spreadsheet interface over SQL.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Heap and Sigma Computing actually diverge.
| Attribute | Heap | Sigma Computing |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | On request |
| Pricing model | Unknown | quote |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Platforms | Web, iOS, Android | Web |
| Category | Technology | Spreadsheets |
| Founded | 2013 | Unknown |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Heap
- Autocapture
- Retroactive analytics
- Session replay
- Funnel analysis
- User segmentation
- Path analysis
- Data science
- Virtual events
Only in Sigma Computing
- Spreadsheet interface over SQL
- No extract layer
- Input tables and write-back
- Workbooks
- Embedded analytics
- Version control and dbt awareness
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Heap
- User behavior analysisnot Sigma Computing
- Conversion optimizationnot Sigma Computing
- Product adoptionnot Sigma Computing
- Customer journey mappingnot Sigma Computing
- A/B testing analysisnot Sigma Computing
Sigma Computing
- A finance or operations team that lives in spreadsheets and needs warehouse-scale data without exporting CSVsnot Heap
- An organisation that has consolidated on Snowflake or Databricks and wants one governed access layer rather than several desktop toolsnot Heap
- Planning and scenario work where users need to type assumptions back into governed tables rather than into a local filenot Heap
- Embedding customer-facing analytics into a product where each tenant must only see their own rowsnot Heap
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Heap
- No built-in A/B testing or feature flags; requires integration with separate tools for experimentation
- Group analytics and advanced features require a sales conversation, not self-serve
- Cloud-only deployment; no self-hosted option for data security or compliance requirements
- Session replay lacks developer debugging tools compared to PostHog
- Pricing for Growth and Pro plans requires direct sales contact; no transparency on how pricing scales
Sigma Computing
- Every user interaction is a live warehouse query, so compute costs rise with adoption and land on the warehouse invoice rather than the BI line item, which routinely surprises the team that approved the purchase.
- It cannot work without a supported cloud data warehouse, so an organisation running analytics on an on-premises database or a plain application database has nothing to connect to.
- Pricing is not published and seats are differentiated by capability, so budgeting requires a sales cycle and a headcount forecast before you can compare it with a tool you could simply buy.
- Performance is only as good as the warehouse behind it, which means slow or badly modelled tables surface as a slow interface and the fix is a data engineering project, not a Sigma setting.
- Statistical and scientific visualisation is limited compared with dedicated tools, so anything beyond standard business charting has to be done elsewhere and brought back in.
Pricing, plan by plan
Heap
Free- FreeFree
- Up to 10,000 monthly sessions
- Basic charts
- 6 months data history
- Growth$undefined/custom
- Custom session pricing
- Sense AI assistant
- 12 months data history
- Pro$undefined/custom
- Custom session pricing
- Account analytics
- Engagement matrix
- Premier$undefined/custom
- Custom session pricing
- Data warehouse integration
- Unlimited projects
Sigma Computing
On request- Sigma Computing$undefined/year
- Quoted per organisation
- Seat types are differentiated by whether a user views, explores or authors
- Warehouse compute is billed separately by your cloud data warehouse vendor
Which should you pick?
Choose Heap if
- You need autocapture.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want retroactive analytics.
Choose Sigma Computing if
- You need spreadsheet interface over sql.
- You also want no extract layer.
Questions people ask
- Is Heap or Sigma Computing better?
- Neither clearly leads. Heap starts at Free and Sigma Computing at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Heap or Sigma Computing?
- Heap has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Heap and On request for Sigma Computing.
- Does Heap or Sigma Computing run on more platforms?
- Heap runs on Web, iOS, Android. Sigma Computing runs on Web.
- Can I use Heap for free?
- Yes. Heap has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Sigma Computing starts at On request.
- What is Heap best used for?
- Heap is most often used for user behavior analysis, conversion optimization, product adoption, customer journey mapping. Of those, user behavior analysis and conversion optimization are not what Sigma Computing is typically brought in for.
- What can Heap do that Sigma Computing cannot?
- Heap covers Autocapture, Retroactive analytics, Session replay, Funnel analysis. Sigma Computing covers Spreadsheet interface over SQL, No extract layer, Input tables and write-back, Workbooks.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Heap: What does Heap's autocapture feature do?
Heap's autocapture is a single code snippet that automatically captures every click, swipe, tap, pageview, and form fill on your website and apps without requiring manual event setup. Once installed, Heap captures the entire digital experience of every user on every platform with no ongoing engineering maintenance needed.
SourceSigma Computing: Does Sigma store a copy of my data?
No. Queries are executed on your warehouse and results are returned for display, which is why there is no extract refresh to manage.
Heap: What are Heap's pricing plans and how much do they cost?
Heap offers a Free plan for up to 10,000 monthly sessions. Growth, Pro, and Premier plans use custom session-based pricing that requires contacting sales for a quote. Free includes basic charts and 6 months data history. Growth adds the Sense AI assistant. Pro adds account analytics. Premier adds data warehouse integration and dedicated customer success management.
SourceSigma Computing: What does it actually cost?
The vendor does not publish prices. Expect an annual contract priced by seat type, plus a warehouse compute increase you should model separately.
Heap: Does Heap include session replay and A/B testing?
Heap includes integrated session replay showing exactly what users did on your site. However, Heap does not include built-in A/B testing or feature flags. Teams requiring these capabilities must use separate tools or integrate with third-party platforms.
SourceSigma Computing: Can business users break the warehouse?
They can run expensive queries. Warehouse sizing, query limits and materialised tables are the controls, and they need configuring before a wide rollout.
Heap: What integrations does Heap support?
Heap supports over 100 integrations connecting to business tools including marketing platforms, CRMs, and data warehouses. This allows insights to reach relevant teams and ensures data flows to other business systems automatically.
SourceSigma Computing: Is it a replacement for a modelling layer like dbt?
No. Sigma works best on top of modelled tables and is usually deployed alongside dbt rather than instead of it.
Heap: Does Heap offer self-hosting or is it cloud-only?
Heap is cloud-only and does not offer self-hosted options. Organizations requiring on-premises deployment should consider alternatives like PostHog which supports self-hosting alongside its cloud product.
SourceHeap: What is Sense and how does it help with analytics?
Sense Chat is Heap's AI assistant that enables users to access analytics without extensive technical knowledge. It allows teams to ask questions about user behavior and get answers directly without lengthy onboarding or technical expertise, making insights more accessible to non-technical stakeholders.
SourceRelated pages
More on Sigma Computing
Other head to heads
- Heap vs Mixpanel
- Heap vs PostHog
- Heap vs Amplitude
- Heap vs Pendo
- Heap vs Userpilot
- Heap vs Segment
- Heap vs RescueTime
- Heap vs Lovable
- Heap vs Coda
- Heap vs Istio
- Heap vs Linear
- Heap vs Terraform
- Heap vs Intercom
- Heap vs LaunchDarkly
- Heap vs Monday.com
- Heap vs Tableau
- Heap vs Metabase
- Heap vs Looker
- Heap vs Equals
- Heap vs Redash
- Heap vs Apache Superset
- Heap vs APITable
- Heap vs Coefficient
- Heap vs Mathesar
- Heap vs SeaTable
- Heap vs Numbers
- Heap vs Zoho Sheet
- Heap vs Cube Software
- Heap vs Quadratic
- Heap vs Rowy
- Heap vs Teable
- Sigma Computing vs Mixpanel
- Sigma Computing vs PostHog
- Sigma Computing vs Amplitude
- Sigma Computing vs Pendo
- Sigma Computing vs Userpilot
- Sigma Computing vs Segment
- Sigma Computing vs RescueTime
- Sigma Computing vs Lovable
- Sigma Computing vs Coda
- Sigma Computing vs Istio
- Sigma Computing vs Linear
- Sigma Computing vs Terraform
- Sigma Computing vs Intercom
- Sigma Computing vs LaunchDarkly
- Sigma Computing vs Monday.com
- Sigma Computing vs Tableau
- Sigma Computing vs Metabase
- Sigma Computing vs Looker
- Sigma Computing vs Equals
- Sigma Computing vs Redash
- Sigma Computing vs Apache Superset
- Sigma Computing vs APITable
- Sigma Computing vs Coefficient
- Sigma Computing vs Mathesar
- Sigma Computing vs SeaTable
- Sigma Computing vs Numbers
- Sigma Computing vs Zoho Sheet
- Sigma Computing vs Cube Software
- Sigma Computing vs Quadratic
- Sigma Computing vs Rowy
- Sigma Computing vs Teable

