Nonprofits · head to head
GuideStar vs Sumac

Sumac
Nonprofits
Modular nonprofit CRM that pairs donor management with client case management
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only GuideStar has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: GuideStar guideStar and Foundation Directory are being retired and merged into a single Candid platform, per Candid's own learning.candid.org help pages, with existing subscribers redirected to log in at app.candid.org; Sumac pricing is not published at all, so a small organisation cannot compare Sumac against per contact priced competitors without committing to a sales process.
- They diverge on capability: GuideStar covers Nonprofit profile, Sumac covers Donor and gift management.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which GuideStar and Sumac actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Nonprofits).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in GuideStar
- Nonprofit profile
- Impact data
- Donor verification
- Financial transparency
- Ratings
- Salesforce
- Google Analytics
- Web support
Only in Sumac
- Donor and gift management
- Case management module
- Memberships and volunteers
- Grant management
- Role based permissions
- Custom fields and forms
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
GuideStar
- Business operationsnot Sumac
- Productivitynot Sumac
- Automationnot Sumac
Sumac
- A social service agency that must record client cases and donor gifts without buying two systemsnot GuideStar
- A charity that wants only donor and grant modules and refuses to pay for an events suite it will not usenot GuideStar
- A Canadian organisation wanting local support hours and receipting conventionsnot GuideStar
- An agency replacing a legacy Access or FileMaker database with something supportednot GuideStar
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
GuideStar
- GuideStar and Foundation Directory are being retired and merged into a single Candid platform, per Candid's own learning.candid.org help pages, with existing subscribers redirected to log in at app.candid.org
- Candid's own pricing page lists Candid Premium (annual) at $1,199 per year in USD, and $219 per month if billed monthly, with an Ultimate annual tier at $1,699 per year adding compliance monitoring features
- Candid's free tier limits search results, profile views and dashboards; full grants and profile data downloads are capped even on Premium annual, at 1,000 grants downloads and 5,000 profile downloads per month
Sumac
- Pricing is not published at all, so a small organisation cannot compare Sumac against per contact priced competitors without committing to a sales process.
- The interface reflects the product's age, and staff arriving from consumer grade software find navigation and data entry slower than in newer CRMs.
- Holding client case notes and donor records in one database makes permission design a compliance obligation, and a misconfigured role can expose confidential client material to fundraising staff.
- The integration catalogue is small, so payment, email and accounting connections outside the listed few mean manual export or paid custom work.
- Modular licensing means the price rises in visible steps as programmes expand, and organisations frequently discover the module they need most was not in the original quote.
Pricing, plan by plan
GuideStar
Free- ProfileFree
- Nonprofit profile
- Basic data
- Gold$300/month
- Enhanced profile
- Donor verification
- Impact reporting
Sumac
On request- Sumac$undefined/year
- Quoted by module selection and organisation size
- Case management is a separately licensed module
- Implementation and data migration quoted separately
Which should you pick?
Choose GuideStar if
- You need nonprofit profile.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Mobile-responsive.
- You also want impact data.
Choose Sumac if
- You need donor and gift management.
- You work on Web, Windows.
- You also want case management module.
Questions people ask
- Is GuideStar or Sumac better?
- Neither clearly leads. GuideStar starts at Free and Sumac at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, GuideStar or Sumac?
- GuideStar has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for GuideStar and On request for Sumac.
- Does GuideStar or Sumac run on more platforms?
- GuideStar runs on Web, Mobile-responsive. Sumac runs on Web, Windows.
- Can I use GuideStar for free?
- Yes. GuideStar has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Sumac starts at On request.
- What is GuideStar best used for?
- GuideStar is most often used for business operations, productivity, automation. Of those, business operations and productivity are not what Sumac is typically brought in for.
- What can GuideStar do that Sumac cannot?
- GuideStar covers Nonprofit profile, Impact data, Donor verification, Financial transparency. Sumac covers Donor and gift management, Case management module, Memberships and volunteers, Grant management.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Sumac: Is Sumac the same product as Societ?
The vendor has been moving its products under the Societ brand, so you may see both names for the same platform during a sales cycle.
Sumac: Can it handle client case management?
Yes, that is its clearest differentiator among donor CRMs. It is a licensed module, not part of the base product.
Sumac: Is pricing published?
No. It is quoted by module and organisation size, which makes like for like comparison harder than with published per contact products.
Sumac: Does it work for US charities?
Yes, though the vendor is Canadian and its receipting and support conventions are strongest for Canadian organisations.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- GuideStar vs GrantStation
- GuideStar vs Instrumentl
- GuideStar vs Constant Contact
- GuideStar vs GiveWP
- GuideStar vs Classy
- GuideStar vs Donorbox
- GuideStar vs Fluxx
- GuideStar vs Foundant Technologies
- GuideStar vs OpenGrants
- GuideStar vs Charity Navigator
- GuideStar vs EveryAction
- GuideStar vs QuickBooks for Nonprofits
- GuideStar vs Kindful
- GuideStar vs Microsoft Nonprofit Program
- GuideStar vs Mightycause
- GuideStar vs MobileCause
- GuideStar vs CharityEngine
- GuideStar vs Bloomerang
- GuideStar vs DonorPerfect
- GuideStar vs Bonterra
- GuideStar vs Keela
- GuideStar vs Blackbaud Raiser's Edge
- GuideStar vs CiviCRM
- GuideStar vs SmartSimple Cloud
- GuideStar vs Aplos
- GuideStar vs Wild Apricot
- GuideStar vs CommCare
- GuideStar vs Raisely
- GuideStar vs SignUpGenius
- GuideStar vs TechSoup
- GuideStar vs Tendenci
- Sumac vs GrantStation
- Sumac vs Instrumentl
- Sumac vs Constant Contact
- Sumac vs GiveWP
- Sumac vs Classy
- Sumac vs Donorbox
- Sumac vs Fluxx
- Sumac vs Foundant Technologies
- Sumac vs OpenGrants
- Sumac vs Charity Navigator
- Sumac vs EveryAction
- Sumac vs QuickBooks for Nonprofits
- Sumac vs Kindful
- Sumac vs Microsoft Nonprofit Program
- Sumac vs Mightycause
- Sumac vs MobileCause
- Sumac vs CharityEngine
- Sumac vs Bloomerang
- Sumac vs DonorPerfect
- Sumac vs Bonterra
- Sumac vs Keela
- Sumac vs Blackbaud Raiser's Edge
- Sumac vs CiviCRM
- Sumac vs SmartSimple Cloud
- Sumac vs Aplos
- Sumac vs Wild Apricot
- Sumac vs CommCare
- Sumac vs Raisely
- Sumac vs SignUpGenius
- Sumac vs TechSoup
- Sumac vs Tendenci

