Nonprofits · head to head
Sumac vs Tendenci

Sumac
Nonprofits
Modular nonprofit CRM that pairs donor management with client case management
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Tendenci
Nonprofits
Open-source association management system for nonprofits
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Tendenci has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Sumac pricing is not published at all, so a small organisation cannot compare Sumac against per contact priced competitors without committing to a sales process.; Tendenci self-hosting is a real operational commitment, and organisations without technical capacity should not treat the free licence as a free system
- They diverge on capability: Sumac covers Donor and gift management, Tendenci covers Open-source licence.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Sumac and Tendenci actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Nonprofits).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Sumac
- Donor and gift management
- Case management module
- Memberships and volunteers
- Grant management
- Role based permissions
- Custom fields and forms
Only in Tendenci
- Open-source licence
- Membership management
- Events and registration
- Donations
- Content-managed website
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Sumac
- A social service agency that must record client cases and donor gifts without buying two systemsnot Tendenci
- A charity that wants only donor and grant modules and refuses to pay for an events suite it will not usenot Tendenci
- A Canadian organisation wanting local support hours and receipting conventionsnot Tendenci
- An agency replacing a legacy Access or FileMaker database with something supportednot Tendenci
Tendenci
- Nonprofits whose boards require member and donor data to stay under their own controlnot Sumac
- Organisations with data residency obligations a hosted platform cannot satisfynot Sumac
- Groups with technical capacity wanting to avoid per-member subscription costs at scalenot Sumac
- Associations needing to customise workflows beyond what a proprietary platform allowsnot Sumac
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Sumac
- Pricing is not published at all, so a small organisation cannot compare Sumac against per contact priced competitors without committing to a sales process.
- The interface reflects the product's age, and staff arriving from consumer grade software find navigation and data entry slower than in newer CRMs.
- Holding client case notes and donor records in one database makes permission design a compliance obligation, and a misconfigured role can expose confidential client material to fundraising staff.
- The integration catalogue is small, so payment, email and accounting connections outside the listed few mean manual export or paid custom work.
- Modular licensing means the price rises in visible steps as programmes expand, and organisations frequently discover the module they need most was not in the original quote.
Tendenci
- Self-hosting is a real operational commitment, and organisations without technical capacity should not treat the free licence as a free system
- The community is small compared with mainstream open-source projects, so answers are harder to find and contributors are few
- The interface is dated against the commercial association platforms and this is the most common user complaint
- Fewer integrations than commercial competitors, and building them is a development task rather than a configuration one
- Feature depth in events and continuing education is behind the specialist commercial systems
Pricing, plan by plan
Sumac
On request- Sumac$undefined/year
- Quoted by module selection and organisation size
- Case management is a separately licensed module
- Implementation and data migration quoted separately
Tendenci
Free- Self-hostedFree
- Full source code
- No per-member licence
- Community support
- Managed hosting$undefined/month
- Hosted and maintained
- Updates applied
- Support included
Which should you pick?
Choose Sumac if
- You need donor and gift management.
- You work on Web, Windows.
- You also want case management module.
Choose Tendenci if
- You need open-source licence.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Linux, Self-hosted, Cloud.
- You also want membership management.
Questions people ask
- Is Sumac or Tendenci better?
- Neither clearly leads. Sumac starts at On request and Tendenci at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Sumac or Tendenci?
- Tendenci has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at On request for Sumac and Free for Tendenci.
- Does Sumac or Tendenci run on more platforms?
- Sumac runs on Web, Windows. Tendenci runs on Web, Linux, Self-hosted, Cloud.
- Can I use Tendenci for free?
- Yes. Tendenci has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Sumac starts at On request.
- What is Sumac best used for?
- Sumac is most often used for a social service agency that must record client cases and donor gifts without buying two systems, a charity that wants only donor and grant modules and refuses to pay for an events suite it will not use, a canadian organisation wanting local support hours and receipting conventions, an agency replacing a legacy access or filemaker database with something supported. Of those, a social service agency that must record client cases and donor gifts without buying two systems and a charity that wants only donor and grant modules and refuses to pay for an events suite it will not use are not what Tendenci is typically brought in for.
- What can Sumac do that Tendenci cannot?
- Sumac covers Donor and gift management, Case management module, Memberships and volunteers, Grant management. Tendenci covers Open-source licence, Membership management, Events and registration, Donations.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Sumac: Is Sumac the same product as Societ?
The vendor has been moving its products under the Societ brand, so you may see both names for the same platform during a sales cycle.
Tendenci: Is Tendenci really free?
The software is, under an open-source licence with no per-member fee. Running it is not: hosting, updates, backups and security are the organisation responsibility unless managed hosting is purchased.
Sumac: Can it handle client case management?
Yes, that is its clearest differentiator among donor CRMs. It is a licensed module, not part of the base product.
Tendenci: Who should choose it?
Organisations with a genuine requirement to control their own data, and the technical capacity to act on it. Choosing it purely to avoid subscription cost usually ends badly.
Sumac: Is pricing published?
No. It is quoted by module and organisation size, which makes like for like comparison harder than with published per contact products.
Tendenci: Can I move my data out?
Yes, entirely. That is the point. Data lives in a PostgreSQL database you control, and there is no vendor holding it.
Sumac: Does it work for US charities?
Yes, though the vendor is Canadian and its receipting and support conventions are strongest for Canadian organisations.
Tendenci: How does it compare to Wild Apricot?
Wild Apricot is easier, better supported and better looking. Tendenci is the answer when data ownership is a requirement rather than a preference.
Tendenci: Is it actively maintained?
It is developed openly on GitHub with a small team and community. Check recent commit activity before committing, as with any small open-source project.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Sumac vs CharityEngine
- Sumac vs Bloomerang
- Sumac vs DonorPerfect
- Sumac vs Bonterra
- Sumac vs Keela
- Sumac vs Blackbaud Raiser's Edge
- Sumac vs CiviCRM
- Sumac vs GrantStation
- Sumac vs SmartSimple Cloud
- Sumac vs Aplos
- Sumac vs Wild Apricot
- Sumac vs CommCare
- Sumac vs OpenGrants
- Sumac vs QuickBooks for Nonprofits
- Sumac vs Raisely
- Sumac vs SignUpGenius
- Sumac vs TechSoup
- Sumac vs MemberClicks
- Sumac vs Glue Up
- Sumac vs Submittable
- Sumac vs NeonCRM
- Sumac vs Little Green Light
- Sumac vs Salesforce for Nonprofits
- Sumac vs Salsa CRM
- Sumac vs Virtuous
- Tendenci vs CharityEngine
- Tendenci vs Bloomerang
- Tendenci vs DonorPerfect
- Tendenci vs Bonterra
- Tendenci vs Keela
- Tendenci vs Blackbaud Raiser's Edge
- Tendenci vs CiviCRM
- Tendenci vs GrantStation
- Tendenci vs SmartSimple Cloud
- Tendenci vs Aplos
- Tendenci vs Wild Apricot
- Tendenci vs CommCare
- Tendenci vs OpenGrants
- Tendenci vs QuickBooks for Nonprofits
- Tendenci vs Raisely
- Tendenci vs SignUpGenius
- Tendenci vs TechSoup
- Tendenci vs MemberClicks
- Tendenci vs Glue Up
- Tendenci vs Submittable
- Tendenci vs NeonCRM
- Tendenci vs Little Green Light
- Tendenci vs Salesforce for Nonprofits
- Tendenci vs Salsa CRM
- Tendenci vs Virtuous
