Nonprofits · head to head
CiviCRM vs GiveSmart

CiviCRM
Nonprofits
Open source constituent relationship management for nonprofits, with no per contact or per donation fee
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

GiveSmart
Nonprofits
Mobile bidding and event fundraising for charity auctions and galas
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only CiviCRM has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: CiviCRM nobody maintains it for you, so security patches and major version upgrades are your operational responsibility and organisations that skip them end up stranded on an old release.; GiveSmart licensing is annual while many buyers run a single event a year, so the effective cost per event is far higher than the annual figure makes it look.
- They diverge on capability: CiviCRM covers Contribution and pledge tracking, GiveSmart covers Mobile bidding.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which CiviCRM and GiveSmart actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Nonprofits).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in CiviCRM
- Contribution and pledge tracking
- Membership management
- Events and registration
- Case management
- CMS integration
- Extension framework
Only in GiveSmart
- Mobile bidding
- Auction management
- Ticketing and check in
- Text to give
- Paddle raise and appeals
- Payment settlement
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
CiviCRM
- A membership organisation with a large contact file that refuses to pay a per contact meternot GiveSmart
- An advocacy group needing to hold constituent data on infrastructure it controlsnot GiveSmart
- A charity already running Drupal or WordPress that wants CRM inside the same stacknot GiveSmart
- An organisation with unusual data requirements that no hosted product will build for itnot GiveSmart
GiveSmart
- A hospital or school foundation running an annual gala with a live and silent auctionnot CiviCRM
- An organisation losing revenue to uncollected pledges after event nightnot CiviCRM
- A charity running several auction events a year that can amortise an annual licencenot CiviCRM
- A team wanting bidding, check in and payment settlement handled by one system on the nightnot CiviCRM
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
CiviCRM
- Nobody maintains it for you, so security patches and major version upgrades are your operational responsibility and organisations that skip them end up stranded on an old release.
- The interface and configuration model are dated compared with hosted competitors, and staff turnover is expensive when the next fundraiser has to be trained on it from scratch.
- Extension quality is inconsistent, so a payment processor or integration that works on one version can break on the next with no vendor obligation to fix it.
- Total cost of ownership is genuinely low only at scale, and a five person charity often pays more to a partner for setup and support than a hosted product would have charged outright.
- Implementation partners hold the practical knowledge of your configuration, so switching partners can be as disruptive as switching products despite the software being free.
GiveSmart
- Licensing is annual while many buyers run a single event a year, so the effective cost per event is far higher than the annual figure makes it look.
- Pricing is not published, and quotes commonly separate the licence, payment processing, hardware and event night staffing, so the first number a buyer sees is rarely the total.
- On site technical support and equipment are usually extra, and organisations that decline them discover that event night is the worst possible time to be self supporting.
- It is event software rather than a donor CRM, so guest and bidder data has to be pushed into the CRM afterwards or the relationship built at the gala is not retained.
- Consolidation under Community Brands means several nominally competing products share an owner, which reduces the negotiating leverage a buyer thinks a shortlist gives them.
Pricing, plan by plan
CiviCRM
Free- CiviCRMFree
- No licence fee, no per contact charge and no percentage of donations
- Costs are hosting, implementation partner time and upgrade work
- Paid hosting and support available from partners at their own rates
GiveSmart
On request- GiveSmart$undefined/year
- Quoted as an annual licence rather than per event
- Payment processing charged separately on funds raised
- On site staffing, hardware and additional event support quoted as add ons
Which should you pick?
Choose CiviCRM if
- You need contribution and pledge tracking.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Linux, Self-hosted.
- You also want membership management.
Choose GiveSmart if
- You need mobile bidding.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want auction management.
Questions people ask
- Is CiviCRM or GiveSmart better?
- Neither clearly leads. CiviCRM starts at Free and GiveSmart at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, CiviCRM or GiveSmart?
- CiviCRM has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for CiviCRM and On request for GiveSmart.
- Does CiviCRM or GiveSmart run on more platforms?
- CiviCRM runs on Web, Linux, Self-hosted. GiveSmart runs on Web, iOS, Android.
- Can I use CiviCRM for free?
- Yes. CiviCRM has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. GiveSmart starts at On request.
- What is CiviCRM best used for?
- CiviCRM is most often used for a membership organisation with a large contact file that refuses to pay a per contact meter, an advocacy group needing to hold constituent data on infrastructure it controls, a charity already running drupal or wordpress that wants crm inside the same stack, an organisation with unusual data requirements that no hosted product will build for it. Of those, a membership organisation with a large contact file that refuses to pay a per contact meter and an advocacy group needing to hold constituent data on infrastructure it controls are not what GiveSmart is typically brought in for.
- What can CiviCRM do that GiveSmart cannot?
- CiviCRM covers Contribution and pledge tracking, Membership management, Events and registration, Case management. GiveSmart covers Mobile bidding, Auction management, Ticketing and check in, Text to give.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
CiviCRM: Is CiviCRM really free?
The software is, with no licence, per contact or per donation charge. Hosting, implementation and support are real costs and are where the budget goes.
GiveSmart: Is GiveSmart priced per event?
It is normally an annual licence, so organisations running one event a year carry the full cost against one night.
CiviCRM: Do we need a developer?
You need technical capacity, either in house or a retained partner. Treating it as a hosted product without support is the common failure mode.
GiveSmart: Who owns GiveSmart?
Community Brands, the private equity backed nonprofit and association software group that also owns MemberClicks.
CiviCRM: Where does it win against commercial CRMs?
At scale. A large contact file or high donation volume that would cost tens of thousands a year in metered fees costs nothing in licence here.
GiveSmart: Does it replace our donor database?
No. It captures bidders and guests at an event and needs to feed a CRM afterwards.
CiviCRM: Can it be hosted for us?
Yes, several partners offer managed CiviCRM hosting, which removes the upgrade burden and reintroduces a monthly fee.
GiveSmart: What is the actual benefit over paper bid sheets?
Bidding continues across the room and payment settles before guests leave, which is where paper auctions lose money.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- CiviCRM vs DonorPerfect
- CiviCRM vs Salsa CRM
- CiviCRM vs EveryAction
- CiviCRM vs Tendenci
- CiviCRM vs CharityEngine
- CiviCRM vs Keela
- CiviCRM vs Sumac
- CiviCRM vs Bloomerang
- CiviCRM vs NeonCRM
- CiviCRM vs Virtuous
- CiviCRM vs Blackbaud Raiser's Edge
- CiviCRM vs Network for Good
- CiviCRM vs Fundraise Up
- CiviCRM vs Get Connected
- CiviCRM vs Give Lively
- CiviCRM vs Google Nonprofit Tools
- CiviCRM vs InitLive
- CiviCRM vs Handbid
- CiviCRM vs Qgiv
- CiviCRM vs OneCause
- CiviCRM vs Raisely
- CiviCRM vs Classy
- CiviCRM vs MobileCause
- CiviCRM vs Candid
- CiviCRM vs SmartSimple Cloud
- CiviCRM vs Constant Contact
- CiviCRM vs Bloomerang Volunteer
- CiviCRM vs Bonterra
- CiviCRM vs Canva for Nonprofits
- CiviCRM vs Cause IQ
- CiviCRM vs Charity Navigator
- GiveSmart vs DonorPerfect
- GiveSmart vs Salsa CRM
- GiveSmart vs EveryAction
- GiveSmart vs Tendenci
- GiveSmart vs CharityEngine
- GiveSmart vs Keela
- GiveSmart vs Sumac
- GiveSmart vs Bloomerang
- GiveSmart vs NeonCRM
- GiveSmart vs Virtuous
- GiveSmart vs Blackbaud Raiser's Edge
- GiveSmart vs Network for Good
- GiveSmart vs Fundraise Up
- GiveSmart vs Get Connected
- GiveSmart vs Give Lively
- GiveSmart vs Google Nonprofit Tools
- GiveSmart vs InitLive
- GiveSmart vs Handbid
- GiveSmart vs Qgiv
- GiveSmart vs OneCause
- GiveSmart vs Raisely
- GiveSmart vs Classy
- GiveSmart vs MobileCause
- GiveSmart vs Candid
- GiveSmart vs SmartSimple Cloud
- GiveSmart vs Constant Contact
- GiveSmart vs Bloomerang Volunteer
- GiveSmart vs Bonterra
- GiveSmart vs Canva for Nonprofits
- GiveSmart vs Cause IQ
- GiveSmart vs Charity Navigator
