Nonprofits · head to head
GiveSmart vs Tendenci

GiveSmart
Nonprofits
Mobile bidding and event fundraising for charity auctions and galas
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Tendenci
Nonprofits
Open-source association management system for nonprofits
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Tendenci has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: GiveSmart licensing is annual while many buyers run a single event a year, so the effective cost per event is far higher than the annual figure makes it look.; Tendenci self-hosting is a real operational commitment, and organisations without technical capacity should not treat the free licence as a free system
- They diverge on capability: GiveSmart covers Mobile bidding, Tendenci covers Open-source licence.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which GiveSmart and Tendenci actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Nonprofits).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in GiveSmart
- Mobile bidding
- Auction management
- Ticketing and check in
- Text to give
- Paddle raise and appeals
- Payment settlement
Only in Tendenci
- Open-source licence
- Membership management
- Events and registration
- Donations
- Content-managed website
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
GiveSmart
- A hospital or school foundation running an annual gala with a live and silent auctionnot Tendenci
- An organisation losing revenue to uncollected pledges after event nightnot Tendenci
- A charity running several auction events a year that can amortise an annual licencenot Tendenci
- A team wanting bidding, check in and payment settlement handled by one system on the nightnot Tendenci
Tendenci
- Nonprofits whose boards require member and donor data to stay under their own controlnot GiveSmart
- Organisations with data residency obligations a hosted platform cannot satisfynot GiveSmart
- Groups with technical capacity wanting to avoid per-member subscription costs at scalenot GiveSmart
- Associations needing to customise workflows beyond what a proprietary platform allowsnot GiveSmart
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
GiveSmart
- Licensing is annual while many buyers run a single event a year, so the effective cost per event is far higher than the annual figure makes it look.
- Pricing is not published, and quotes commonly separate the licence, payment processing, hardware and event night staffing, so the first number a buyer sees is rarely the total.
- On site technical support and equipment are usually extra, and organisations that decline them discover that event night is the worst possible time to be self supporting.
- It is event software rather than a donor CRM, so guest and bidder data has to be pushed into the CRM afterwards or the relationship built at the gala is not retained.
- Consolidation under Community Brands means several nominally competing products share an owner, which reduces the negotiating leverage a buyer thinks a shortlist gives them.
Tendenci
- Self-hosting is a real operational commitment, and organisations without technical capacity should not treat the free licence as a free system
- The community is small compared with mainstream open-source projects, so answers are harder to find and contributors are few
- The interface is dated against the commercial association platforms and this is the most common user complaint
- Fewer integrations than commercial competitors, and building them is a development task rather than a configuration one
- Feature depth in events and continuing education is behind the specialist commercial systems
Pricing, plan by plan
GiveSmart
On request- GiveSmart$undefined/year
- Quoted as an annual licence rather than per event
- Payment processing charged separately on funds raised
- On site staffing, hardware and additional event support quoted as add ons
Tendenci
Free- Self-hostedFree
- Full source code
- No per-member licence
- Community support
- Managed hosting$undefined/month
- Hosted and maintained
- Updates applied
- Support included
Which should you pick?
Choose GiveSmart if
- You need mobile bidding.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want auction management.
Choose Tendenci if
- You need open-source licence.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Linux, Self-hosted, Cloud.
- You also want membership management.
Questions people ask
- Is GiveSmart or Tendenci better?
- Neither clearly leads. GiveSmart starts at On request and Tendenci at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, GiveSmart or Tendenci?
- Tendenci has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at On request for GiveSmart and Free for Tendenci.
- Does GiveSmart or Tendenci run on more platforms?
- GiveSmart runs on Web, iOS, Android. Tendenci runs on Web, Linux, Self-hosted, Cloud.
- Can I use Tendenci for free?
- Yes. Tendenci has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. GiveSmart starts at On request.
- What is GiveSmart best used for?
- GiveSmart is most often used for a hospital or school foundation running an annual gala with a live and silent auction, an organisation losing revenue to uncollected pledges after event night, a charity running several auction events a year that can amortise an annual licence, a team wanting bidding, check in and payment settlement handled by one system on the night. Of those, a hospital or school foundation running an annual gala with a live and silent auction and an organisation losing revenue to uncollected pledges after event night are not what Tendenci is typically brought in for.
- What can GiveSmart do that Tendenci cannot?
- GiveSmart covers Mobile bidding, Auction management, Ticketing and check in, Text to give. Tendenci covers Open-source licence, Membership management, Events and registration, Donations.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
GiveSmart: Is GiveSmart priced per event?
It is normally an annual licence, so organisations running one event a year carry the full cost against one night.
Tendenci: Is Tendenci really free?
The software is, under an open-source licence with no per-member fee. Running it is not: hosting, updates, backups and security are the organisation responsibility unless managed hosting is purchased.
GiveSmart: Who owns GiveSmart?
Community Brands, the private equity backed nonprofit and association software group that also owns MemberClicks.
Tendenci: Who should choose it?
Organisations with a genuine requirement to control their own data, and the technical capacity to act on it. Choosing it purely to avoid subscription cost usually ends badly.
GiveSmart: Does it replace our donor database?
No. It captures bidders and guests at an event and needs to feed a CRM afterwards.
Tendenci: Can I move my data out?
Yes, entirely. That is the point. Data lives in a PostgreSQL database you control, and there is no vendor holding it.
GiveSmart: What is the actual benefit over paper bid sheets?
Bidding continues across the room and payment settles before guests leave, which is where paper auctions lose money.
Tendenci: How does it compare to Wild Apricot?
Wild Apricot is easier, better supported and better looking. Tendenci is the answer when data ownership is a requirement rather than a preference.
Tendenci: Is it actively maintained?
It is developed openly on GitHub with a small team and community. Check recent commit activity before committing, as with any small open-source project.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- GiveSmart vs Handbid
- GiveSmart vs Qgiv
- GiveSmart vs OneCause
- GiveSmart vs Give Lively
- GiveSmart vs Raisely
- GiveSmart vs Classy
- GiveSmart vs MobileCause
- GiveSmart vs Candid
- GiveSmart vs SmartSimple Cloud
- GiveSmart vs CiviCRM
- GiveSmart vs InitLive
- GiveSmart vs Constant Contact
- GiveSmart vs Bloomerang Volunteer
- GiveSmart vs Bonterra
- GiveSmart vs Canva for Nonprofits
- GiveSmart vs Cause IQ
- GiveSmart vs Charity Navigator
- GiveSmart vs MemberClicks
- GiveSmart vs Glue Up
- GiveSmart vs Submittable
- GiveSmart vs Blackbaud Raiser's Edge
- GiveSmart vs Bloomerang
- GiveSmart vs NeonCRM
- GiveSmart vs DonorPerfect
- GiveSmart vs CharityEngine
- GiveSmart vs GrantStation
- GiveSmart vs Little Green Light
- GiveSmart vs Salesforce for Nonprofits
- GiveSmart vs Salsa CRM
- GiveSmart vs Virtuous
- GiveSmart vs CommCare
- GiveSmart vs Wild Apricot
- Tendenci vs Handbid
- Tendenci vs Qgiv
- Tendenci vs OneCause
- Tendenci vs Give Lively
- Tendenci vs Raisely
- Tendenci vs Classy
- Tendenci vs MobileCause
- Tendenci vs Candid
- Tendenci vs SmartSimple Cloud
- Tendenci vs CiviCRM
- Tendenci vs InitLive
- Tendenci vs Constant Contact
- Tendenci vs Bloomerang Volunteer
- Tendenci vs Bonterra
- Tendenci vs Canva for Nonprofits
- Tendenci vs Cause IQ
- Tendenci vs Charity Navigator
- Tendenci vs MemberClicks
- Tendenci vs Glue Up
- Tendenci vs Submittable
- Tendenci vs Blackbaud Raiser's Edge
- Tendenci vs Bloomerang
- Tendenci vs NeonCRM
- Tendenci vs DonorPerfect
- Tendenci vs CharityEngine
- Tendenci vs GrantStation
- Tendenci vs Little Green Light
- Tendenci vs Salesforce for Nonprofits
- Tendenci vs Salsa CRM
- Tendenci vs Virtuous
- Tendenci vs CommCare
- Tendenci vs Wild Apricot
