Nonprofits · head to head
CiviCRM vs Raisely

CiviCRM
Nonprofits
Open source constituent relationship management for nonprofits, with no per contact or per donation fee
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Raisely
Nonprofits
Peer to peer and campaign fundraising platform funded by optional donor tips rather than a platform fee
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only CiviCRM has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: CiviCRM nobody maintains it for you, so security patches and major version upgrades are your operational responsibility and organisations that skip them end up stranded on an old release.; Raisely the tip model performs unevenly, so an organisation with an older or offline recruited donor base sees a lower tip rate and quietly absorbs more of the platform cost than the model assumes.
- They diverge on capability: CiviCRM covers Contribution and pledge tracking, Raisely covers Peer to peer fundraising.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which CiviCRM and Raisely actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Nonprofits).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in CiviCRM
- Contribution and pledge tracking
- Membership management
- Events and registration
- Case management
- CMS integration
- Extension framework
Only in Raisely
- Peer to peer fundraising
- Customisable campaign pages
- Recurring giving
- Matched giving and appeals
- Open API and webhooks
- Automations
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
CiviCRM
- A membership organisation with a large contact file that refuses to pay a per contact meternot Raisely
- An advocacy group needing to hold constituent data on infrastructure it controlsnot Raisely
- A charity already running Drupal or WordPress that wants CRM inside the same stacknot Raisely
- An organisation with unusual data requirements that no hosted product will build for itnot Raisely
Raisely
- A charity running a challenge or endurance event where supporters raise money on their own pagesnot CiviCRM
- A campaign team that wants each appeal to look bespoke without rebuilding infrastructure each timenot CiviCRM
- An organisation unwilling to give a platform a percentage of a large peer to peer income linenot CiviCRM
- A digital team with front end skills or an agency partner who will customise the supporter journeynot CiviCRM
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
CiviCRM
- Nobody maintains it for you, so security patches and major version upgrades are your operational responsibility and organisations that skip them end up stranded on an old release.
- The interface and configuration model are dated compared with hosted competitors, and staff turnover is expensive when the next fundraiser has to be trained on it from scratch.
- Extension quality is inconsistent, so a payment processor or integration that works on one version can break on the next with no vendor obligation to fix it.
- Total cost of ownership is genuinely low only at scale, and a five person charity often pays more to a partner for setup and support than a hosted product would have charged outright.
- Implementation partners hold the practical knowledge of your configuration, so switching partners can be as disruptive as switching products despite the software being free.
Raisely
- The tip model performs unevenly, so an organisation with an older or offline recruited donor base sees a lower tip rate and quietly absorbs more of the platform cost than the model assumes.
- It is a campaign platform, not a CRM, so supporter data must be synced onward and organisations that skip that step lose cross channel giving history.
- Getting the most out of the customisation requires front end capability, and charities without it run campaigns that look like the default template while paying for a platform built for the opposite.
- Support hours are anchored to Australian time zones, which leaves European and North American teams waiting overnight during a live campaign.
- Payment processing is tied to a small set of processors, so organisations with an existing merchant relationship or unusual regional payment needs may not be able to keep it.
Pricing, plan by plan
CiviCRM
Free- CiviCRMFree
- No licence fee, no per contact charge and no percentage of donations
- Costs are hosting, implementation partner time and upgrade work
- Paid hosting and support available from partners at their own rates
Raisely
On request- Raisely$undefined/year
- No platform percentage charged to the organisation on the core plan
- Donors are prompted to add an optional contribution to the platform at checkout
- Card processing is charged separately by the payment processor
Which should you pick?
Choose CiviCRM if
- You need contribution and pledge tracking.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Linux, Self-hosted.
- You also want membership management.
Choose Raisely if
- You need peer to peer fundraising.
- You also want customisable campaign pages.
Questions people ask
- Is CiviCRM or Raisely better?
- Neither clearly leads. CiviCRM starts at Free and Raisely at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, CiviCRM or Raisely?
- CiviCRM has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for CiviCRM and On request for Raisely.
- Does CiviCRM or Raisely run on more platforms?
- CiviCRM runs on Web, Linux, Self-hosted. Raisely runs on Web.
- Can I use CiviCRM for free?
- Yes. CiviCRM has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Raisely starts at On request.
- What is CiviCRM best used for?
- CiviCRM is most often used for a membership organisation with a large contact file that refuses to pay a per contact meter, an advocacy group needing to hold constituent data on infrastructure it controls, a charity already running drupal or wordpress that wants crm inside the same stack, an organisation with unusual data requirements that no hosted product will build for it. Of those, a membership organisation with a large contact file that refuses to pay a per contact meter and an advocacy group needing to hold constituent data on infrastructure it controls are not what Raisely is typically brought in for.
- What can CiviCRM do that Raisely cannot?
- CiviCRM covers Contribution and pledge tracking, Membership management, Events and registration, Case management. Raisely covers Peer to peer fundraising, Customisable campaign pages, Recurring giving, Matched giving and appeals.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
CiviCRM: Is CiviCRM really free?
The software is, with no licence, per contact or per donation charge. Hosting, implementation and support are real costs and are where the budget goes.
Raisely: How does Raisely make money if there is no platform fee?
Donors are prompted to add a voluntary contribution to the platform at checkout, and some organisations pay for plans that remove the prompt.
CiviCRM: Do we need a developer?
You need technical capacity, either in house or a retained partner. Treating it as a hosted product without support is the common failure mode.
Raisely: Does the tip prompt reduce donation totals?
It changes the checkout, and results vary by audience. Test it against your own list rather than relying on published averages.
CiviCRM: Where does it win against commercial CRMs?
At scale. A large contact file or high donation volume that would cost tens of thousands a year in metered fees costs nothing in licence here.
Raisely: Is it a donor CRM?
No. It runs campaigns and pushes data to a CRM through the API or an integration.
CiviCRM: Can it be hosted for us?
Yes, several partners offer managed CiviCRM hosting, which removes the upgrade burden and reintroduces a monthly fee.
Raisely: Who is it best for?
Peer to peer and challenge event fundraising where a percentage platform fee on high volume would be the largest single cost.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- CiviCRM vs DonorPerfect
- CiviCRM vs Salsa CRM
- CiviCRM vs EveryAction
- CiviCRM vs Tendenci
- CiviCRM vs CharityEngine
- CiviCRM vs Keela
- CiviCRM vs Sumac
- CiviCRM vs Bloomerang
- CiviCRM vs NeonCRM
- CiviCRM vs Virtuous
- CiviCRM vs Blackbaud Raiser's Edge
- CiviCRM vs Network for Good
- CiviCRM vs Fundraise Up
- CiviCRM vs Get Connected
- CiviCRM vs Give Lively
- CiviCRM vs GiveSmart
- CiviCRM vs Google Nonprofit Tools
- CiviCRM vs InitLive
- CiviCRM vs Classy
- CiviCRM vs Givebutter
- CiviCRM vs Funraise
- CiviCRM vs Qgiv
- CiviCRM vs GuideStar
- CiviCRM vs Wild Apricot
- CiviCRM vs Handbid
- CiviCRM vs Foundant Technologies
- Raisely vs DonorPerfect
- Raisely vs Salsa CRM
- Raisely vs EveryAction
- Raisely vs Tendenci
- Raisely vs CharityEngine
- Raisely vs Keela
- Raisely vs Sumac
- Raisely vs Bloomerang
- Raisely vs NeonCRM
- Raisely vs Virtuous
- Raisely vs Blackbaud Raiser's Edge
- Raisely vs Network for Good
- Raisely vs Fundraise Up
- Raisely vs Get Connected
- Raisely vs Give Lively
- Raisely vs GiveSmart
- Raisely vs Google Nonprofit Tools
- Raisely vs InitLive
- Raisely vs Classy
- Raisely vs Givebutter
- Raisely vs Funraise
- Raisely vs Qgiv
- Raisely vs GuideStar
- Raisely vs Wild Apricot
- Raisely vs Handbid
- Raisely vs Foundant Technologies
