Nonprofits · head to head
CiviCRM vs Give Lively

CiviCRM
Nonprofits
Open source constituent relationship management for nonprofits, with no per contact or per donation fee
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Give Lively
Nonprofits
Fundraising software given free to nonprofits, funded by its founders rather than by fees
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: CiviCRM nobody maintains it for you, so security patches and major version upgrades are your operational responsibility and organisations that skip them end up stranded on an old release.; Give Lively eligibility is limited to US 501(c)(3) organisations, so charities registered in the UK, Canada, Australia or the EU cannot use it at all regardless of fit.
- They diverge on capability: CiviCRM covers Contribution and pledge tracking, Give Lively covers Branded donation pages.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which CiviCRM and Give Lively actually diverge.
| Attribute | CiviCRM | Give Lively |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Open source, no licence fee | Free to nonprofits, card processing charged by the processor |
| Platforms | Web, Linux, Self-hosted | Web |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Nonprofits).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in CiviCRM
- Contribution and pledge tracking
- Membership management
- Events and registration
- Case management
- CMS integration
- Extension framework
Only in Give Lively
- Branded donation pages
- Peer-to-peer fundraising
- Text-to-donate
- Event ticketing
- Donor database
- DAFpay
- Multiple processors
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
CiviCRM
- A membership organisation with a large contact file that refuses to pay a per contact meternot Give Lively
- An advocacy group needing to hold constituent data on infrastructure it controlsnot Give Lively
- A charity already running Drupal or WordPress that wants CRM inside the same stacknot Give Lively
- An organisation with unusual data requirements that no hosted product will build for itnot Give Lively
Give Lively
- A US nonprofit currently paying a percentage platform fee on every gift and wanting that money back in programme budgetnot CiviCRM
- Running a peer-to-peer campaign where thin margins make a per-donation platform cut painfulnot CiviCRM
- A small organisation with no software budget that still needs branded, mobile-ready donation pagesnot CiviCRM
- Adding donor advised fund giving at checkout without paying for a separate DAF integrationnot CiviCRM
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
CiviCRM
- Nobody maintains it for you, so security patches and major version upgrades are your operational responsibility and organisations that skip them end up stranded on an old release.
- The interface and configuration model are dated compared with hosted competitors, and staff turnover is expensive when the next fundraiser has to be trained on it from scratch.
- Extension quality is inconsistent, so a payment processor or integration that works on one version can break on the next with no vendor obligation to fix it.
- Total cost of ownership is genuinely low only at scale, and a five person charity often pays more to a partner for setup and support than a hosted product would have charged outright.
- Implementation partners hold the practical knowledge of your configuration, so switching partners can be as disruptive as switching products despite the software being free.
Give Lively
- Eligibility is limited to US 501(c)(3) organisations, so charities registered in the UK, Canada, Australia or the EU cannot use it at all regardless of fit.
- The platform is funded by its founders' personal philanthropy rather than by revenue, so there is no contractual commitment to a roadmap or a service level and no paying customer base to keep it alive if that funding stops.
- Support is email based with no paid escalation tier, so an organisation mid-campaign with a broken form has no way to buy faster attention.
- The donor database is adequate for gift tracking but thin compared with a real CRM, so most organisations still pay for Bloomerang, DonorPerfect or Salesforce alongside it and maintain a sync.
- Optional donor tips appear at checkout to fund the platform, which some boards object to because it puts a second ask in front of a donor who has already decided what to give.
Pricing, plan by plan
CiviCRM
Free- CiviCRMFree
- No licence fee, no per contact charge and no percentage of donations
- Costs are hosting, implementation partner time and upgrade work
- Paid hosting and support available from partners at their own rates
Give Lively
Free- Give LivelyFree
- All fundraising products included
- No platform fee on donations
- No setup or subscription charge
Which should you pick?
Choose CiviCRM if
- You need contribution and pledge tracking.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Linux, Self-hosted.
- You also want membership management.
Choose Give Lively if
- You need branded donation pages.
- You want to start without paying.
- You also want peer-to-peer fundraising.
Questions people ask
- Is CiviCRM or Give Lively better?
- Neither clearly leads. CiviCRM starts at Free and Give Lively at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, CiviCRM or Give Lively?
- CiviCRM starts at Free and Give Lively at Free.
- Does CiviCRM or Give Lively run on more platforms?
- CiviCRM runs on Web, Linux, Self-hosted. Give Lively runs on Web.
- Can I use CiviCRM for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is CiviCRM best used for?
- CiviCRM is most often used for a membership organisation with a large contact file that refuses to pay a per contact meter, an advocacy group needing to hold constituent data on infrastructure it controls, a charity already running drupal or wordpress that wants crm inside the same stack, an organisation with unusual data requirements that no hosted product will build for it. Of those, a membership organisation with a large contact file that refuses to pay a per contact meter and an advocacy group needing to hold constituent data on infrastructure it controls are not what Give Lively is typically brought in for.
- What can CiviCRM do that Give Lively cannot?
- CiviCRM covers Contribution and pledge tracking, Membership management, Events and registration, Case management. Give Lively covers Branded donation pages, Peer-to-peer fundraising, Text-to-donate, Event ticketing.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
CiviCRM: Is CiviCRM really free?
The software is, with no licence, per contact or per donation charge. Hosting, implementation and support are real costs and are where the budget goes.
Give Lively: Is it genuinely free, or free with a percentage taken?
Genuinely free. Give Lively takes no cut of donations and charges no subscription. You pay only the card processing fee, which goes to Stripe, Shift4 or PayPal, starting around 1.99% plus $0.25.
CiviCRM: Do we need a developer?
You need technical capacity, either in house or a retained partner. Treating it as a hosted product without support is the common failure mode.
Give Lively: How does the company make money?
It does not, in the ordinary sense. Operating costs are covered by its founders as a philanthropic commitment, plus voluntary tips donors can add at checkout.
CiviCRM: Where does it win against commercial CRMs?
At scale. A large contact file or high donation volume that would cost tens of thousands a year in metered fees costs nothing in licence here.
Give Lively: Can a UK or Canadian charity use it?
No. Give Lively requires US 501(c)(3) status.
CiviCRM: Can it be hosted for us?
Yes, several partners offer managed CiviCRM hosting, which removes the upgrade burden and reintroduces a monthly fee.
Give Lively: Does it replace a donor CRM?
Not for most organisations. It stores donors and gift history, but fundraisers running major gift or grant pipelines usually keep a dedicated CRM and sync to it.
Related pages
More on Give Lively
Other head to heads
- CiviCRM vs DonorPerfect
- CiviCRM vs Salsa CRM
- CiviCRM vs EveryAction
- CiviCRM vs Tendenci
- CiviCRM vs CharityEngine
- CiviCRM vs Keela
- CiviCRM vs Sumac
- CiviCRM vs Bloomerang
- CiviCRM vs NeonCRM
- CiviCRM vs Virtuous
- CiviCRM vs Blackbaud Raiser's Edge
- CiviCRM vs Network for Good
- CiviCRM vs Fundraise Up
- CiviCRM vs Get Connected
- CiviCRM vs GiveSmart
- CiviCRM vs Google Nonprofit Tools
- CiviCRM vs InitLive
- CiviCRM vs Classy
- CiviCRM vs Donorbox
- CiviCRM vs Givebutter
- CiviCRM vs Zeffy
- CiviCRM vs Raisely
- CiviCRM vs Qgiv
- CiviCRM vs Charity Navigator
- CiviCRM vs Instrumentl
- CiviCRM vs OneCause
- CiviCRM vs SmartSimple Cloud
- CiviCRM vs Aplos
- CiviCRM vs Apptio Monetize
- CiviCRM vs Blackbaud Grantmaking
- Give Lively vs DonorPerfect
- Give Lively vs Salsa CRM
- Give Lively vs EveryAction
- Give Lively vs Tendenci
- Give Lively vs CharityEngine
- Give Lively vs Keela
- Give Lively vs Sumac
- Give Lively vs Bloomerang
- Give Lively vs NeonCRM
- Give Lively vs Virtuous
- Give Lively vs Blackbaud Raiser's Edge
- Give Lively vs Network for Good
- Give Lively vs Fundraise Up
- Give Lively vs Get Connected
- Give Lively vs GiveSmart
- Give Lively vs Google Nonprofit Tools
- Give Lively vs InitLive
- Give Lively vs Classy
- Give Lively vs Donorbox
- Give Lively vs Givebutter
- Give Lively vs Zeffy
- Give Lively vs Raisely
- Give Lively vs Qgiv
- Give Lively vs Charity Navigator
- Give Lively vs Instrumentl
- Give Lively vs OneCause
- Give Lively vs SmartSimple Cloud
- Give Lively vs Aplos
- Give Lively vs Apptio Monetize
- Give Lively vs Blackbaud Grantmaking
