Nonprofits · head to head
Aplos vs Give Lively

Aplos
Nonprofits
Fund accounting for nonprofits and churches, with donor management and online giving attached
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Give Lively
Nonprofits
Fundraising software given free to nonprofits, funded by its founders rather than by fees
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Give Lively has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Aplos the donor management side is record keeping rather than fundraising software, so any organisation running segmented appeals or automation will still buy a CRM and pay twice.; Give Lively eligibility is limited to US 501(c)(3) organisations, so charities registered in the UK, Canada, Australia or the EU cannot use it at all regardless of fit.
- They diverge on capability: Aplos covers Fund accounting ledger, Give Lively covers Branded donation pages.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Aplos and Give Lively actually diverge.
| Attribute | Aplos | Give Lively |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | On request | Free |
| Pricing model | Per month by feature tier | Free to nonprofits, card processing charged by the processor |
| Free tier | No | Yes |
| Platforms | Web, iOS, Android | Web |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Nonprofits).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Aplos
- Fund accounting ledger
- Nonprofit financial statements
- Donor management
- Online giving pages
- Budgeting by fund
- Church tools
Only in Give Lively
- Branded donation pages
- Peer-to-peer fundraising
- Text-to-donate
- Event ticketing
- Donor database
- DAFpay
- Multiple processors
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Aplos
- A nonprofit whose auditor has raised restricted fund reporting as a findingnot Give Lively
- A church tracking contributions, designated funds and giving statements in one systemnot Give Lively
- A small organisation replacing QuickBooks plus a spreadsheet of fund balancesnot Give Lively
- An Aplos and Keela buyer wanting gifts to post from the CRM into the ledger without exportnot Give Lively
Give Lively
- A US nonprofit currently paying a percentage platform fee on every gift and wanting that money back in programme budgetnot Aplos
- Running a peer-to-peer campaign where thin margins make a per-donation platform cut painfulnot Aplos
- A small organisation with no software budget that still needs branded, mobile-ready donation pagesnot Aplos
- Adding donor advised fund giving at checkout without paying for a separate DAF integrationnot Aplos
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Aplos
- The donor management side is record keeping rather than fundraising software, so any organisation running segmented appeals or automation will still buy a CRM and pay twice.
- It is not a general ledger for complex structures, so multi entity groups, consolidations and intercompany transactions push organisations back to a mainstream accounting package.
- Higher tiers are needed for the budgeting and custom reporting many buyers assume are standard, so the entry price is rarely the real price.
- Payroll is handled through a partner rather than natively, which adds a vendor and a reconciliation step for organisations with staff.
- The bookkeeper ecosystem is far smaller than QuickBooks, so finding an accountant already fluent in the product is harder and handover after staff turnover takes longer.
Give Lively
- Eligibility is limited to US 501(c)(3) organisations, so charities registered in the UK, Canada, Australia or the EU cannot use it at all regardless of fit.
- The platform is funded by its founders' personal philanthropy rather than by revenue, so there is no contractual commitment to a roadmap or a service level and no paying customer base to keep it alive if that funding stops.
- Support is email based with no paid escalation tier, so an organisation mid-campaign with a broken form has no way to buy faster attention.
- The donor database is adequate for gift tracking but thin compared with a real CRM, so most organisations still pay for Bloomerang, DonorPerfect or Salesforce alongside it and maintain a sync.
- Optional donor tips appear at checkout to fund the platform, which some boards object to because it puts a second ask in front of a donor who has already decided what to give.
Pricing, plan by plan
Aplos
On request- Aplos$undefined/month
- Published monthly tiers separating core accounting from the full suite
- Advanced accounting, budgeting by fund and custom reporting sit in higher tiers
- Card and bank processing on donations charged separately
Give Lively
Free- Give LivelyFree
- All fundraising products included
- No platform fee on donations
- No setup or subscription charge
Which should you pick?
Choose Aplos if
- You need fund accounting ledger.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want nonprofit financial statements.
Choose Give Lively if
- You need branded donation pages.
- You want to start without paying.
- You also want peer-to-peer fundraising.
Questions people ask
- Is Aplos or Give Lively better?
- Neither clearly leads. Aplos starts at On request and Give Lively at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Aplos or Give Lively?
- Give Lively has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at On request for Aplos and Free for Give Lively.
- Does Aplos or Give Lively run on more platforms?
- Aplos runs on Web, iOS, Android. Give Lively runs on Web.
- Can I use Give Lively for free?
- Yes. Give Lively has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Aplos starts at On request.
- What is Aplos best used for?
- Aplos is most often used for a nonprofit whose auditor has raised restricted fund reporting as a finding, a church tracking contributions, designated funds and giving statements in one system, a small organisation replacing quickbooks plus a spreadsheet of fund balances, an aplos and keela buyer wanting gifts to post from the crm into the ledger without export. Of those, a nonprofit whose auditor has raised restricted fund reporting as a finding and a church tracking contributions, designated funds and giving statements in one system are not what Give Lively is typically brought in for.
- What can Aplos do that Give Lively cannot?
- Aplos covers Fund accounting ledger, Nonprofit financial statements, Donor management, Online giving pages. Give Lively covers Branded donation pages, Peer-to-peer fundraising, Text-to-donate, Event ticketing.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Aplos: Is Aplos an accounting system or a CRM?
Primarily fund accounting. The donor management is included but shallow compared with a dedicated nonprofit CRM.
Give Lively: Is it genuinely free, or free with a percentage taken?
Genuinely free. Give Lively takes no cut of donations and charges no subscription. You pay only the card processing fee, which goes to Stripe, Shift4 or PayPal, starting around 1.99% plus $0.25.
Aplos: What is the relationship with Keela?
Aplos acquired Keela in 2023. The two are being integrated, so a buyer comparing them is comparing products from one company.
Give Lively: How does the company make money?
It does not, in the ordinary sense. Operating costs are covered by its founders as a philanthropic commitment, plus voluntary tips donors can add at checkout.
Aplos: Can it replace QuickBooks?
For a single entity nonprofit, usually yes, and it handles restricted funds far better. For multi entity consolidation, no.
Give Lively: Can a UK or Canadian charity use it?
No. Give Lively requires US 501(c)(3) status.
Aplos: Does it handle payroll?
Through a partner integration rather than natively, so payroll is an extra subscription and an extra reconciliation.
Give Lively: Does it replace a donor CRM?
Not for most organisations. It stores donors and gift history, but fundraisers running major gift or grant pipelines usually keep a dedicated CRM and sync to it.
Related pages
More on Give Lively
Other head to heads
- Aplos vs Blackbaud Raiser's Edge
- Aplos vs Bloomerang
- Aplos vs CharityEngine
- Aplos vs Sumac
- Aplos vs NeonCRM
- Aplos vs DonorPerfect
- Aplos vs Salesforce for Nonprofits
- Aplos vs Little Green Light
- Aplos vs Kindful
- Aplos vs Network for Good
- Aplos vs Virtuous
- Aplos vs CiviCRM
- Aplos vs Fundraise Up
- Aplos vs Get Connected
- Aplos vs GiveSmart
- Aplos vs Google Nonprofit Tools
- Aplos vs InitLive
- Aplos vs Classy
- Aplos vs Donorbox
- Aplos vs Givebutter
- Aplos vs Zeffy
- Aplos vs Raisely
- Aplos vs Qgiv
- Aplos vs Charity Navigator
- Aplos vs Instrumentl
- Aplos vs Keela
- Aplos vs OneCause
- Aplos vs SmartSimple Cloud
- Aplos vs Apptio Monetize
- Aplos vs Blackbaud Grantmaking
- Give Lively vs Blackbaud Raiser's Edge
- Give Lively vs Bloomerang
- Give Lively vs CharityEngine
- Give Lively vs Sumac
- Give Lively vs NeonCRM
- Give Lively vs DonorPerfect
- Give Lively vs Salesforce for Nonprofits
- Give Lively vs Little Green Light
- Give Lively vs Kindful
- Give Lively vs Network for Good
- Give Lively vs Virtuous
- Give Lively vs CiviCRM
- Give Lively vs Fundraise Up
- Give Lively vs Get Connected
- Give Lively vs GiveSmart
- Give Lively vs Google Nonprofit Tools
- Give Lively vs InitLive
- Give Lively vs Classy
- Give Lively vs Donorbox
- Give Lively vs Givebutter
- Give Lively vs Zeffy
- Give Lively vs Raisely
- Give Lively vs Qgiv
- Give Lively vs Charity Navigator
- Give Lively vs Instrumentl
- Give Lively vs Keela
- Give Lively vs OneCause
- Give Lively vs SmartSimple Cloud
- Give Lively vs Apptio Monetize
- Give Lively vs Blackbaud Grantmaking
