Marketing · head to head
Freshpaint vs Qualtrics CoreXM

Freshpaint
Marketing
Privacy layer that lets healthcare organisations run marketing analytics without sending PHI
- From
- On request
- Free plan
- No

Qualtrics CoreXM
Surveys
Enterprise survey and market research platform, priced by seat and response volume through negotiated contracts
- From
- On request
- Free plan
- No
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Freshpaint filtering necessarily degrades what advertising platforms receive, so campaign optimisation and lookalike modelling perform worse than an unfiltered pixel would, and the marketing team must accept measurably weaker targeting as the price of compliance.; Qualtrics CoreXM there is no public pricing for any deployment beyond a small individual self-service plan, so budgeting requires a sales conversation before a shortlist can even be built.
- They diverge on capability: Freshpaint covers PHI detection and redaction, Qualtrics CoreXM covers Advanced survey logic.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Freshpaint and Qualtrics CoreXM actually diverge.
| Attribute | Freshpaint | Qualtrics CoreXM |
|---|---|---|
| Platforms | Web | Web, iOS, Android |
| Category | Marketing | Surveys |
Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (quote), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Freshpaint
- PHI detection and redaction
- Business associate agreement
- Event verification
- Pixel replacement
- Consent governance
- Advertising destinations
- Analytics and session tools
- Audience activation
Only in Qualtrics CoreXM
- Advanced survey logic
- Statistical analysis tools
- Text analytics
- Dashboards and reporting
- Panel integration
- API and platform integrations
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Freshpaint
- A health system told by legal to remove its Meta and Google pixels that still needs to report cost per acquisition on service line campaignsnot Qualtrics CoreXM
- A provider running paid search for elective procedures that must send conversion signals without disclosing which condition page a visitor viewednot Qualtrics CoreXM
- A compliance officer who needs a field level record of exactly what patient related data leaves the website, for a privacy committeenot Qualtrics CoreXM
- A multi-site provider group standardising tracking governance across marketing agencies that would otherwise each add their own tagsnot Qualtrics CoreXM
Qualtrics CoreXM
- A market research team running quantitative studies that need built-in statistical significance testingnot Freshpaint
- A product team wanting text analytics on open-ended customer feedback at scalenot Freshpaint
- An enterprise consolidating multiple survey tools into one platform with a single data warehouse integrationnot Freshpaint
- A researcher who needs access to third-party respondent panels alongside the survey buildernot Freshpaint
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Freshpaint
- Filtering necessarily degrades what advertising platforms receive, so campaign optimisation and lookalike modelling perform worse than an unfiltered pixel would, and the marketing team must accept measurably weaker targeting as the price of compliance.
- Pricing is not published on the vendor site despite three named tiers, and third party reports of entry around 599 US dollars a month cover only the lowest tier, with audiences and advertising activation sitting above it.
- It addresses web and marketing tracking rather than the whole protected health information estate, so it solves one exposure while patient data in the CRM, call centre and email tooling remains a separate problem.
- The commercial case rests on a specific regulatory interpretation of online tracking technologies, and litigation and future guidance could narrow or widen it, which makes the size of the problem it solves less stable than a compliance purchase usually is.
- It is built for healthcare and priced accordingly, so an organisation wanting a general customer data platform pays for a regulatory specialism it does not need and gets narrower general purpose functionality than Segment or RudderStack.
Qualtrics CoreXM
- There is no public pricing for any deployment beyond a small individual self-service plan, so budgeting requires a sales conversation before a shortlist can even be built.
- Typical small enterprise contracts run 25,000 to 50,000 US dollars a year, which puts it far outside the budget of small businesses that Typeform, Jotform or SurveyMonkey serve well.
- The interface and logic builder have a steep learning curve compared with lighter tools, so new users need training before building complex surveys confidently.
- It is easy to confuse with Qualtrics EmployeeXM in the same product family; buyers evaluating employee engagement specifically should look at EmployeeXM, not CoreXM.
- Multi-year contracts with per-module add-ons mean the effective cost tends to grow year over year as teams add capabilities piecemeal.
Pricing, plan by plan
Freshpaint
On request- Comply$undefined/month
- Governance and consent foundation
- PHI detection and redaction
- Web analytics, funnels and surveys
- Perform$undefined/month
- Everything in Comply
- Audiences and demand side platform activation
- Attribution, journeys and recommendations
- Scale$undefined/month
- Everything in Perform
- Ad performance reporting
- Full AI feature access
Qualtrics CoreXM
On request- CoreXM$undefined/year
- Self-service entry plan around 35 USD a month for small individual use
- Typical small enterprise contracts between 25,000 and 50,000 USD a year
- Priced by seats, response volume and modules selected
Which should you pick?
Choose Freshpaint if
- You need phi detection and redaction.
- You also want business associate agreement.
Choose Qualtrics CoreXM if
- You need advanced survey logic.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want statistical analysis tools.
Questions people ask
- Is Freshpaint or Qualtrics CoreXM better?
- Neither clearly leads. Freshpaint starts at On request and Qualtrics CoreXM at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Freshpaint or Qualtrics CoreXM?
- Freshpaint starts at On request and Qualtrics CoreXM at On request.
- Does Freshpaint or Qualtrics CoreXM run on more platforms?
- Freshpaint runs on Web. Qualtrics CoreXM runs on Web, iOS, Android.
- What is Freshpaint best used for?
- Freshpaint is most often used for a health system told by legal to remove its meta and google pixels that still needs to report cost per acquisition on service line campaigns, a provider running paid search for elective procedures that must send conversion signals without disclosing which condition page a visitor viewed, a compliance officer who needs a field level record of exactly what patient related data leaves the website, for a privacy committee, a multi-site provider group standardising tracking governance across marketing agencies that would otherwise each add their own tags. Of those, a health system told by legal to remove its meta and google pixels that still needs to report cost per acquisition on service line campaigns and a provider running paid search for elective procedures that must send conversion signals without disclosing which condition page a visitor viewed are not what Qualtrics CoreXM is typically brought in for.
- What can Freshpaint do that Qualtrics CoreXM cannot?
- Freshpaint covers PHI detection and redaction, Business associate agreement, Event verification, Pixel replacement. Qualtrics CoreXM covers Advanced survey logic, Statistical analysis tools, Text analytics, Dashboards and reporting.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Freshpaint: Why can a hospital not just use Google Analytics?
US Department of Health and Human Services guidance treats IP addresses and health related page URLs as protected health information in this context, and advertising and analytics platforms will not sign a business associate agreement, so the disclosure is unlawful without an intermediary that filters.
Qualtrics CoreXM: How is CoreXM different from Qualtrics EmployeeXM?
CoreXM is the general-purpose survey and market research engine; EmployeeXM is a separate, HR-focused product built specifically for employee engagement programmes.
Freshpaint: Does Freshpaint sign a BAA?
Yes, and it holds SOC 2 Type II. That is the central reason it exists, because the destination platforms will not.
Qualtrics CoreXM: Is there a published price list?
No, only a small self-service plan around 35 USD a month is public; organisational deployments are negotiated and typically run into five or six figures annually.
Freshpaint: What does it cost?
Freshpaint does not publish prices. Three tiers, Comply, Perform and Scale, are all sales led, and third party sources report entry around 599 US dollars a month for the lowest.
Qualtrics CoreXM: Does CoreXM include text analytics?
Yes, automated theme and sentiment extraction on open-ended responses is included as a core capability.
Freshpaint: Will my ad performance suffer?
Somewhat. Stripping identifiers reduces what platforms can optimise against. The trade is weaker targeting in exchange for measurement that a compliance committee will approve.
Related pages
More on Qualtrics CoreXM
Other head to heads
- Freshpaint vs Fathom Analytics
- Freshpaint vs Simple Analytics
- Freshpaint vs Google Analytics
- Freshpaint vs Umami
- Freshpaint vs Attribution
- Freshpaint vs Matomo
- Freshpaint vs Plausible
- Freshpaint vs Bloomreach
- Freshpaint vs Insider
- Freshpaint vs Invoca
- Freshpaint vs Madgicx
- Freshpaint vs Mautic
- Freshpaint vs Typeform
- Freshpaint vs MoEngage
- Freshpaint vs Optimizely
- Freshpaint vs Vimeo
- Freshpaint vs Countly
- Freshpaint vs Sogolytics
- Freshpaint vs GetFeedback
- Freshpaint vs Alchemer
- Freshpaint vs QuestionPro
- Freshpaint vs Medallia
- Freshpaint vs Zonka Feedback
- Freshpaint vs SurveyCTO
- Freshpaint vs Retool
- Freshpaint vs Gravity Forms
- Freshpaint vs Tally
- Freshpaint vs Google Forms
- Freshpaint vs Wufoo
- Freshpaint vs Microsoft Forms
- Freshpaint vs SurveyLegend
- Qualtrics CoreXM vs Fathom Analytics
- Qualtrics CoreXM vs Simple Analytics
- Qualtrics CoreXM vs Google Analytics
- Qualtrics CoreXM vs Umami
- Qualtrics CoreXM vs Attribution
- Qualtrics CoreXM vs Matomo
- Qualtrics CoreXM vs Plausible
- Qualtrics CoreXM vs Bloomreach
- Qualtrics CoreXM vs Insider
- Qualtrics CoreXM vs Invoca
- Qualtrics CoreXM vs Madgicx
- Qualtrics CoreXM vs Mautic
- Qualtrics CoreXM vs Typeform
- Qualtrics CoreXM vs MoEngage
- Qualtrics CoreXM vs Optimizely
- Qualtrics CoreXM vs Vimeo
- Qualtrics CoreXM vs Countly
- Qualtrics CoreXM vs Sogolytics
- Qualtrics CoreXM vs GetFeedback
- Qualtrics CoreXM vs Alchemer
- Qualtrics CoreXM vs QuestionPro
- Qualtrics CoreXM vs Medallia
- Qualtrics CoreXM vs Zonka Feedback
- Qualtrics CoreXM vs SurveyCTO
- Qualtrics CoreXM vs Retool
- Qualtrics CoreXM vs Gravity Forms
- Qualtrics CoreXM vs Tally
- Qualtrics CoreXM vs Google Forms
- Qualtrics CoreXM vs Wufoo
- Qualtrics CoreXM vs Microsoft Forms
- Qualtrics CoreXM vs SurveyLegend
